[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 12 KB, 218x240, IMG_20180716_165153.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11472134 No.11472134 [Reply] [Original]

Since this can undergo changes in style due to time. Is DFW a good dialogue writer?

>> No.11472150
File: 73 KB, 529x529, 358EF293-1526-4B77-A0FE-9C01AC6ECF2B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11472150

>”Your wife’s hair is a living wonder”
>”Yes it is”
>”She has important hair”

>> No.11472487

>>11472150
Am I a pleb for being driven crazy by how much DeLillo truly did not give a fuck about authentic dialogue in that book

>> No.11472503

>>11472487
No. I have never hated a book more than I hate White Noise

>> No.11472515
File: 134 KB, 930x525, manolo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11472515

>> No.11472559

>>11472134
He and his sort write dialogue that wouldn't be out of place in a sitcom or a movie. It's not bad, but it's not literary either. When I think of literary dialogue I think of that which is mostly divorced reality, highly theatrical, and only really makes sense on the page and within the mood and narrative that the author's arranged for it. So DeLillo is, IMO, a very literary writer of dialogue. Hemingway too. Salinger is a very readable and natural writer of dialogue, but not that literary, whereas Dostoevsky is.

>> No.11472565

>>11472134
McCarthy's dialogue is great. All the Pretty Horses' seemed nearly effortless.

>> No.11472586
File: 1012 KB, 350x272, maybenotwhatyouexpected.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11472586

>>11472559
>highly theatrical
Theatricized dialogue in what I consider to be literary is crazytalk. Subtlety is everything to me. Alice Munro, Raymond Carever, Eudora Welty, Chekhov, even Corncob YeCarthy, are all masters of contemporary dialogue. It's another example of show over tell, in which you get the full organic experience in which these characters behave and react to one another. I prefer the subdued over the ridiculous bombast.

>> No.11473210

>>11472134
William Gaddis is GOAT

>> No.11473237

>>11472134
>Is DFW a good dialogue writer?
sometimes, but he's better at portraying inner monologue

>> No.11473248

>>11472503
>>11473210
shut the fuck up

>> No.11473255

>>11473248
White Noise is pleb tier garbage

>> No.11473359

I know this is /lit/, but Richard Linklater and Aaron Sorkin

>> No.11473370

>>11473255
what's wrong with White Noise/DeLillo? I was planning on reading it soon

>> No.11473375

>>11473359
+ David Mamet

>> No.11473429

>>11473248
Gaddis IS goat

>> No.11473756

>>11473359
I'm still convinced Linklater is /the/ man to do an Infinite Jest movie/tv series adaptation