/lit/ writes a serious critique of Jordan Peterson

[Anonymous No.11471592]

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p764TYnG32UuV8yluGPnjYkXeyGq5CHwxMkZM8ne8Ug/edit?usp=sharing

[Anonymous No.11471605]

why does this totally banal jungian psych dude and mainstream conservative trigger leftists so much?

[Anonymous No.11471650]

>>11471605

>mainstream conservative

He's a Neocon

[Anonymous No.11471893]

Lit endorses him

[Anonymous No.11471916]

>>11471592
It was better last night as a bunch of goofs.

[Anonymous No.11472004]

>>11471916
its still a place for goofs. But it needs to be more structured. following the academic formula.

[Anonymous No.11472599]

>>11471605
Is that a Pepe?

[Anonymous No.11472603]

>>11472599
A constructionist version

[Anonymous No.11472617]

>>11471605
he's a liberacon
he distorts jung to suit

[Anonymous No.11472638]

Why does anyone take Jung's pseudoscience seriously other than for introducing a few terms and providing the basis for a decent Japanese vidya game?

[Anonymous No.11472657]

>>11471605
Its fun to laugh at pseuds

[Anonymous No.11472665]

>>11472638
Not to mention the greatest anime ever

[Anonymous No.11472672]

>>11472657
Then write a good long critique on Peterson. a REAL GOOD ONE, so good that he can't recover from it.

[Anonymous No.11472683]

>>11472672
Plenty have been published on the net already

https://medium.com/@jamesmuldoon_24382/jordan-petersons-twitter-explosion-reveals-the-fragile-foundations-of-his-brand-of-masculinity-c4c43b0d962e

https://www.thestar.com/opinion/2018/05/25/i-was-jordan-petersons-strongest-supporter-now-i-think-hes-dangerous.html

[Anonymous No.11472704]

>>11471605
He's a straight white male, which puts him on the far-right.

[Anonymous No.11472715]

>>11472683
he said a good critique, not fucking opinion pieces written by morons

[Anonymous No.11472718]

>>11472704
but I thought oppression narratives didn't exist?

[Anonymous No.11472726]

>>11472715
lol who's being the reductive postmodernist now lmao.

The dude is good at what he does, which is clinical psychiatry, and the application of clinical processes is different from straight up philosophizing. He's a charlatan, sorry.

[Anonymous No.11472739]

>>11472718
They do on the mental level tho.

[Anonymous No.11472742]

>>11472739
but I thought it was the SJW oppression narrative that had to be dismantled because it doesn't actually exist? But it's okay for you to act like you're being oppressed, because...?

[Anonymous No.11472752]

>>11472742
It doesn't exist on my mind.

[Anonymous No.11472762]

>>11472752
so then what are you crying about?

[Anonymous No.11472768]

>>11472762
I'm not though?
I just said his straight white malehood positioned him on the far-right.

[Anonymous No.11472856]

>>11472726
It seems more likely that your just scrambling for a reason to discredit him, since he's starting to become mainstream and in your teenage brain, its now cooler to "not" acknowledge his arguments, the same way you think its cool to bash GoT and white family tourists.
The fact that you sourced articles that are directly targeted for the demographic i described is pretty damning in and of itself.

The only way for you to save yourself at this point is to clearly and logically explain your point of view and how it directly refutes Petersons points.

That was a pretty good pic related though, i chuckled.

[Anonymous No.11472862]

>>11471592
which manloving bucko took out my penishwashing and dragonslaying/fapping memery

[Anonymous No.11472870]

>>11472862
peniswashing is there.

[Anonymous No.11472881]

>american't politics

[Anonymous No.11472954]

>>11472768
will this post modernist war on cisnormaty never end?

[Anonymous No.11472957]

>>11471592
NO WAY MORTY!

[Anonymous No.11472961]

>>11472856
okay, this is epic

[Anonymous No.11473262]

>>11472961
Stop pretending to be me to make me look bad.

[Anonymous No.11473324]

>>11472954
i think it's time to openly start talking openly about the need to defeat ZOG and destroy cultural marxism. when you see one of those blue haired lgbt freaks on the street, challenge them to a round of one on one physical combat. thats just how it goes. fuck ZOG btw.

[Anonymous No.11473343]

>>11472638
what game?

[Anonymous No.11473438]

>>11473324
based

[Anonymous No.11473447]

>>11471592
Dear cuck,

Please take the alt-right cock off your mouth and dedicate to self-help books.

Thanks.

[Anonymous No.11473449]

>>11471605
because conservatives worship this totally banal jungian psych dude

[Anonymous No.11473484]

>>11471592
paraphrased from nick mullen: jp fans are all "facts and logic guys" who got boners when he started talking about dragons and shit

[Anonymous No.11473864]

>>11472704
>being this much of a basedboy leftist
Hello Dyson's cock worshipper.

Also ITT: people that have only heard of JBP from /lit/posts or opinion pieces. Go watch his latest videos instead of just trying to jump into conclusions from 3rd-rate opinions. This thread itself is a definite proof of how fucking 'edgy' and trash /lit/ has become in recent years. Old /lit/ would've at least made good bants while still posting substantial material.

Also your critique is shit. No proper citations 6 pages in and your arguments has more holes than a nigger that's been through a KKK firing range.

[Anonymous No.11473946]

>>11473864
What do you want us to cite? Our hearts?

[Anonymous No.11473953]

assuming this project doesn’t die I’ll expand on my “Third Critique” later, fyi

[Anonymous No.11474248]

>>11473343
Silent Hill

[Anonymous No.11474254]

>>11473953
Cool. Thanks!

[Anonymous No.11474264]

>>11471650
He's a radical conservative a la Maistre, that is to say from the post-revolutionary days, with the same misanthropic views on people as naturally murderous, incapable of containing their animal nature with only human rational keeping them at bay.
He also has strong post-revolutionary Roman Catholic tendencies that could be seen in radical-conservatism of those days, with the idea of western societies in rapid decay unless a certain spirit is restored and upheld, and similar to the radical-conservatives he believes in a Christian metaphysical necessity.

Even Burke rejected these people by the way, and they were kicked out of every country until they ended up in Russia, in the hands of Jordan Peterson's favorite writers who adopted these views.

[Anonymous No.11474266]

>>11473864
Feel free to edit and improve on the critiques :-)

[Anonymous No.11474270]

>>11471605
He's a classical liberal. The guys at Jacobite dislike him because he's too liberal for them.

[Anonymous No.11474271]

>>11471605
What if I told everyone you were secretly trying to destroy civilization with your views, used all the theories you're inspired by only as a tool to instill this necessity of destruction in everyone around you, called everyone you read destroyers of western civilization, and only stuck to rejecting your views morally instead of methodically?

It would trigger me too, I'm not a leftist but is it so hard to engage one another how we should?

[Anonymous No.11474612]

>>11472957
???

[Anonymous No.11474618]

>>11471592
already done
http://www.theimaginativeconservative.org/2018/04/can-jordan-peterson-lead-us-god-john-horvat.html

[Anonymous No.11474622]

>>11474264
No, he is a neocohen.

[Anonymous No.11474810]

>>11473324
idiot!

[Anonymous No.11474834]

>>11471592
Threads like these is exactly why I voted for trump

[Anonymous No.11475728]

bump

[Anonymous No.11475744]

>>11475728
why?

[Anonymous No.11476588]

>Maps of Meaning; Fanged (((Noumena)))
>The Complete Dialogues
>Or, The Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Autism

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v2DSPTUfWH4i3CgKQPXFoEQDu6I8575k42F3QoUIEAI/edit?usp=sharing

[Anonymous No.11476599]

>>11476588
a million monkeys...

[Anonymous No.11476663]

>>11475744
because.