[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 13 KB, 480x360, hqdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11448059 No.11448059 [Reply] [Original]

Now that the dust has settled, who was in the right, /lit/?

>> No.11448063

lacan is daddy, daddy is always right

>> No.11448085

lacan is the master chessplayer of the 20th century philosophic greats
he is the riddler
he is always right

>> No.11448291

the guy in the right

>> No.11448295

>>11448059
the situationist pseud was a little more comprehensible than lacan, so i guess that means he loses

>> No.11448307

>>11448059
What was the kid's point? I don't get it

>> No.11448317

>>11448059
anatole was and is edgelord, but the situationists were in the right. lacan was still working on becoming right at that point in time.

>> No.11448450

>>11448307
Haven't seen the clip in a while, but from what I recall:

Basically that psychoanalysis was part of the problem that it was trying to solve, something that countless authors have said since Freud. Then situationist bonus is that psychoanalysis is allied in a way with the dominant system, the society of the spectacle, and functions within it by detaching problems from their political context, making them personal (unconscious) and promising spectacular results: you'll find out who you really really are deep down, just keep looking and keep paying up!

I may have embellished a bit, but I think that's the overall point.

>> No.11448455

>>11448450
not at all dip shit

>> No.11448479

>>11448455
Ok Lacan, let's hear your well thought out and clear response to such criticism.

>> No.11449367

>>11448455
good response

>> No.11449371

>>11448291
no Lacan is on the left

>> No.11449441

>>11449371
No, that's Zizek.