[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 69 KB, 1000x640, gass14.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11410677 No.11410677 [Reply] [Original]

Who was America's foremost prose stylist?

>> No.11410679

>>11410677
What era?

>> No.11410681

William H. Gass, author of The Tunnel.

>> No.11410821

>>11410681
Damn right'o senpai. Bam bam bamabam bam.

>> No.11410843

Your mom desu

>> No.11410849

Best non-Tunnel-dwelling prose stylist: Saul Bellow

>> No.11411408
File: 11 KB, 500x333, gass15.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11411408

Is there no-one else?

>> No.11411448

I've read some of Gass' essays and want to like him but Tunnel is too dark. Was this prose style ever on display in non-depressing work?

>>11410849
Bellow doesn't belong anywhere near this discussion, rabbi.

>> No.11411575

He Gassed his last :(

>> No.11412627

>>11411448
He got Style, it's just not sleek like a seal

>> No.11412691

>>11411408
Read Gertrud Stein. She's his main influence (maybe split with Rilke) and has some nice prose, my guy.

>> No.11412709

Cormac McCarthy

>> No.11413122

>>11410677
Lmao look at his face, his mouth literally looks like it belongs on a puppet. Fuck this boomer and his languorous academic career. Fuck universities and fuck professors. We've gone full circle boomers! You are not cool and your prose is shit.

>> No.11413135

nabokov

>> No.11413224

>>11410681

Post excerpts

>> No.11414001
File: 27 KB, 300x300, gass.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11414001

>>11413122

>> No.11414294

>>11410677
Gass was a little too keen on assonance and alliteration to be considered America's foremost prose stylist. His insistence that writing be musical was laudable but, alas, he had a poor ear.

>> No.11414326
File: 269 KB, 2000x1125, vroom.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11414326

>>11413224

>> No.11415434

>>11414294
This is such a pointless non-statement. Either critique an extract of his work or take your pseud quips and fuck off.

>> No.11416313

Bump

>> No.11416342
File: 4 KB, 269x188, updike.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

John Updike

>> No.11416362

>>11410677
Oy guys, what about that book History of English prose rhythm something? Did anyone actually read that? Recommend?

>> No.11416416

>>11415434
I'm sorry if you were offended but if you've read anything at all by Gass you'd know what I said was not a "pointless non-statement."

These are his own words: "I see alliteration, assonance, consonance, rhyme, etc., as devices for relating meanings, again independent of syntactical requirements. Word order is purely musical—the note, the tone, arrives, and it is immediately assimilated to everything that has gone before, and to everything that is yet to come. Prose that does not sing is not alive."

But I'm not going to look through his books just to provide excerpts that prove my point, which should be apparent to anyone familiar with his writing.

>> No.11417490

>>11410677
>ctrl f
>no melville
into the trash it goes

>> No.11417652

>>11410677
Though it's a tough battle between Gass, Gaddis, and Nabokov, for my money, I'd say he who cannot be passed: all three are incredibly, incredibly talented, with unique styles with unique strengths, but his mastery of metaphors and language's musicality, I feel, make him the most successful at overcoming some of the problems inherent to his medium.
>>11416416
Not him, but I think he's right. No disrespect, though.

>> No.11417693

>>11417652
>Gass, Gaddis, and Nabokov
Gass is the worst novelist (and artist) out of the three, though.

Also, re another post : What’s Gertrude Stein’s best work ?

>> No.11417737

I would say Faulkner. He’s at least a magnitude beyond everyone else posted in this thread sans Melville

>> No.11417905
File: 261 KB, 950x758, gass5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>11417693
>Gass is the worst novelist (and artist) out of the three, though.
That is incorrect.

>> No.11418618

>>11417693
Eh, as far as writing a full-blown novel goes, Gaddis is, by far, better than either, but I definitely wouldn't call Gass the worst artist out of the three.

>> No.11418652

>>11417693
tender buttons is probably the best but you can pick up an anthology of all of gertrude stein’s works and leaf through it. reading some of her poems and stuff can give you a good idea of what she’s about before diving into a novel.

>> No.11419001

>>11415434
you are an idiot and the other person is correct

>> No.11419009

i pity anyone who truly thinks Gass is an answer to this question

>> No.11419118

>>11418652
Thanks, i’ll look into it. What about Making of Americans ? Heard great things about this one but it seems a little long (english not being my first language and all…).

>> No.11419132

He looks like a fat cat who's about to lose its seventh life.

>> No.11419135

>>11412709
cttl+f
thought no one would be right

>> No.11419156

>>11410677
Oh, you're back.

Please kill yourself already.

>> No.11419180

HERMAN MELVILLE

>> No.11419191

>>11412691
What about Joyce and Beckett my guy

>> No.11419195

David Foster Wallace

>> No.11419391

>>11410677
Herman Melville.

>> No.11419471

>>11416416
Doesn't he say somewhere in The Tunnel that alliteration is a hack tactic on his end? I vaguely remember something like that.

>> No.11419482

>>11416342
This. His books are basically diaries about all the times he cheated on his wife, but, that prose, just damn. It makes reading his shit not only worth it but feel absolutely essential. And The Rabbit quartet is about as American as it gets

>> No.11419698

>>11410681
based

>> No.11419948

>>11416416
By ‘non-statement’ I meant this part of your reply:
>alas, he had a poor ear
This is just a quip to disregard an entire lifetime’s worth of writing, yet its based really on nothing. I have no doubt Gass enjoyed alliteration, that wasn’t what I was disagreeing with.

>> No.11419958
File: 96 KB, 1024x1024, 1508192568327.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>11410677
>ctrl-f
>no pynchon

>> No.11420018

>>11419482
I'm pretty familiar with Updike, but where is his best prose considered to be found specifically?

>> No.11420040

>>11419191
America's foremost prose stylists, everybody!

>> No.11420044

>>11417693
Gaddis>Gass>>>>>Nabokov

>> No.11420255

>>11420044
I’m not american, my dude : I can’t get down with this bs. Gass is second-rate as hell.

>> No.11420280
File: 7 KB, 195x259, 1527160007511.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>> No.11420283

>>11420255
shut it plonker

>> No.11420284

>>11417737
>Faulkner
bwah what a brainlet
Faulkner was worse than fucking Steinbeck and Salinger and you think he's deserving of the same pedestal as Melville?

>> No.11420285

>>11420044
Nabokov is fucking Russian you Herp, how can he be American? He lived there, but he ISN'T AMERICAN

>> No.11420289

David Foster Wallace.

>> No.11420341

>>11420283
You’re a poor aesthete, what can I say ? Gass’ work is barely tolerable, even when working full at his best. There’s something deeply repulsive about such hollow books.

>> No.11420360

>>11420341
>You're a fucking aesthete
>OP: who was America's foremost prose stylist?
even as a "novelist" Gass outwrecks Babakov by a long shot

>> No.11420376

Mary McCarthy was a better stylist simply due to not abusing alliteration at every opportunity, but most of you virgins have not even read her.

>> No.11420389

>>11420360
Again, nobody would actually believe that outside your country. Downright ridiculous, especially when taking a historical perspective. "Novelist"… Learned all I need to know about you from your use of quotation marks.

>> No.11420415

>>11420389
>your use of quotation marks
I was quoting this faggot >>11417693 from which the derail began but ok
>Downright ridiculous
You'll understand I'm right when you'll grow up

>> No.11420428

>>11420415
>You'll understand I'm right when you'll grow up
Except Gass is for college students. One only grows out of such onanism, which is nothing but stylistic posturing anyway. But Proust will clean you, don’t worry.

>> No.11420435

>>11410677
L Frank Baum.

>> No.11420448
File: 32 KB, 512x512, 31df9af6a92a72791cbd9e04aceb0d22ec9043a739bc96da32be84e3be8c6cd2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>11420428
>which is nothing but everything
found your problem, pleb

>> No.11420508

>>11420448
If you think Gaddis, for instance, is nothing but posturing (despite him also being a superior stylist than Gass ofc), you’ve got a problem. Gass is a dead-end at best. Nabokov, while preceding him, also had the decency to be facetious about it, which isn’t something Gass could afford, or even manage. A great stylist wouldn’t need to pose anyway (see Beckett).