/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.11367843]

Can anyone please explain the proper Hegelian Triad to me (the thing-in-itself, thing-for-itself, both one, not the Fichtian), specifically the second term? I am planning to read him in the next few months but would like to have a rough understanding before hand. Thank you for your responses !

[Anonymous No.11367844]

This isn't a fucking philosophy board

>>>/his/

[Anonymous No.11367854]

>>11367844
I think its hardly out of place, seeing the rest of the content on the board (pic).
More conducive to discussion than a bedside table thread, too.

[Anonymous No.11367857]

>>11367854
My cock in your ass is more conducive to discussion faggot, fuck off

[Anonymous No.11367863]

>>11367857
Well that's just not very nice of you.
You beat me! Yay! Feels good, doesn't it?

[Anonymous No.11368022]

>>11367843
Hegel has triads within triads friend.

Like the think you want explained(thing-in-itself, thing-for-itself and the resolve) are the triadic processes the world concept goes through before passing over to the next.

The triadic historical resolve since the Greeks has been Art > Religion > Philosophy

East concept first(as the Absolute itself has before them) gives birth to knowledge of itself(due to dialectical struggle withing itself) which accumulates into thing-in-itself, but just knowledge. Then the concept begins recognition and negation of it;s own thoughts about itself, which eventually through the master-slave struggle reaches full knowledge of itself(thing-for-itself). Don't remember the last part of the triadic process.

[Anonymous No.11368028]

>>11367843
1. don't read anything written here by pseuds
2. don't read hegel directly
3. get yourself logic of desire

[Anonymous No.11368041]

>>11367844
>history board
>philosophy
lmao

[Anonymous No.11368051]

>>11368041
It's the non-literary humanities containment board

[Anonymous No.11368126]

>>11368051
are bible discussions /lit/?