[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 28 KB, 640x449, Jacques Derrida says Viola.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11257651 No.11257651 [Reply] [Original]

Refute him.

Protip: you can't

>> No.11257687

>>11257651
A fucking jew

>> No.11257696

>can - can't binary false dichotomy
Stay pleb

>> No.11257702
File: 84 KB, 439x249, cancer-cells-growing-through-normal-tissue.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11257702

you can't refute cancer either

>> No.11257716

>>11257702
the virgin normal tissue vs the chad cancer

>> No.11257718

>>11257687
>>11257696
>>11257702
not an argument

>> No.11257820

jacques derrida
more like
schlock hairybutt

>> No.11257967
File: 656 KB, 3340x3176, the synthesis.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11257967

>>11257651
unscientific

>> No.11257980

>>11257716
lol

>> No.11258042

Define “refuting”

>> No.11258574

>complex, impenetrable and esoteric literature
Avant-garde at its most genius!
>complex, impenetrable and esoteric philosophy
Obscurantist charlatan hack!

>> No.11258587

>>11258574
>>11258042
>>11257980
>>11257967
>>11257820
not an argument

>> No.11258833

Can I not refute him? I like Derrida, thank you very much.

>> No.11259367

>>11258833
not an argument

>> No.11259376

He was right about everything

>> No.11259395

Derrida didn't exist or write anything. He's a meme, invented in the 90s to discredit postmodernism.
Try to find any contemporary references to him before 1990. You can't, because there are none. Some references were inserted retrospectively to make the hoax more convincing.
The photographs and footage of 'Derrida' were made in the 90s amd are of an out of work actor called Jacques Derrida who never wrote anything. The works attributed to Derrida were written by a text generator.

>> No.11260170

>>11258574
So literature and philosophy are the same thing then?

>> No.11260186

The basis of his work is in Saussurean linguistics, so he can never exactly be right about anything.

>> No.11260286

>>11257651
You don't refute absurdism; you dismiss it straight. That is all that can be done. If the man can't have coherence to facts logical opperants he also doesn't get their benefits of debate, proof, and integration.
You just indentify that the man is a disintegrated thinker and promptly forget him. The only thing one has to worry about is extrocatimg others you buy into his bullshit.

>> No.11260297

>>11259395
>discredit
Postmodernism is an embarrassment on it's own merits. Derida a logical progression from the original fallacies.
Modernism>Postmodernism

>> No.11260351
File: 118 KB, 1129x1200, 1527493918961.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11260351

>>11257651

>refuting someone who asserts nothing

>> No.11260358

>>11258574
Because philosophy tangents politics and self-development and explicitly tries to influence and the world. Literature does so as a side effect.