Teoría de la Literatura

[Bueno No.11234189]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fds-76EkIcc

Aprended español, betillas.

[Anonymous No.11234195]

>>11234189
This is a white board, for white culture. Take this shit elswhere or speak American

[Anonymous No.11234254]

>>11234189
>BTFO ANGLOPOStMODERNKEKS
i actually like his content, but he's so erudite and uses such a complex terminology i can't understand a single fuck of what he says

[Anonymous No.11234656]

>>11234189
Agree. Anglo culture invasion is terrible for every non anglo nation. Even anglos agree, look at Coetzee:

https://elpais.com/cultura/2018/05/26/actualidad/1527353070_758712.html

[Anonymous No.11234797]

>>11234195
>white culture
>American

[Anonymous No.11235503]

Fuck Spain and fuck Mexico, nigga

[Anonymous No.11235611]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80ogZzp_ihc

[Anonymous No.11235635]

Holy shit he actually did BTFO anglos. But still, m-maybe Eagleton is shit and that book is an introduction anyway, so m-maybe it isn't representative of Anglo criticism in a whole?(i don't read much criticism and i don't see any point in reading it except if you're a critic yourself) His concept of "Parabolic criticism" is funny. You see that everywhere, be it in Goodreads or academic stuff (at least from what i read). I think it's just the way that humans relate to literature. Also, there has to be a pdf of his book somewhere. He's interesting, but i'm not buying that shit, hombre.

[Anonymous No.11237175]

The way postmoderns are getting lambasted left right and centre is like beating on a dead horse

[Anonymous No.11237195]

>>11237175
This
Show me one public figure that claims to represent and defends postmodernism

[Anonymous No.11237207]

Right off the bat, you'll never see and American or a Brit academic speak with such asstertiveness, or construct argunments in such a crystal clear manner, straight to the point, no bullshit, strong stances

[Anonymous No.11237214]

>>11237195
>Show me one public figure that claims to represent and defends postmodernism

[Anonymous No.11237217]

>>11237214
Nope

>>11237207
what is his argument?

[Anonymous No.11237242]

>>11237217
>Nope

>poststructuralist gender theory that is a priori based on complete social constructivism
>not postmodern

lmao @ u

[Anonymous No.11237327]

Some of the points he lays out in the beginning, implicitely all refering to american, british anglo saxon postmoderns, or anglo saxons in the past 30, 40, 50 years

>the english speaking post moderns have not yet given a definition of "literature", they can't answer "what is literature" in a clear and concise way, they're always evasive as if everything is literature

>no publication in english has given an answer to the question of "what's the origin of literature"

>no publication in english has talked about the ontolgy of literature

>anglo saxons have not constructed a theory of literary knowledge, or a critique of literary rationalism, they have only restructured and rewritten what others wrote to debunk it, without contributing anything themselves

>there is no theory of literary genres published in english

>there is no theory of fiction published in english

>anglo saxons have written a lot of comparative literature, contradicting post modernism itself since it stipulates that all cultures and literatures are equal, a post modern comparatist is a square circle, a professional sophist, a scammer

About what he himself has contributed, as opposed to just debunking what others have done:
>He has published along with Gustavo Bueno a work titled "Critique of literary reason", going over the fundaments of what all interpretation of literature should be
>the interpretation should be above all critical, rational, scientific, dialectic (not dialogical)
>it should be articulated in the context of the symploke (rooted in plato's sophist), stipulating that things are related to each other, rejecting the domination of one above the rest (metaphysical monism), or the absulte isolation of one against the rest (radical atomism). The criteria laid out in the work reject cognitive absolutism (monism) and absolute relativism
>they give an explicit definition of literature: it's a human construction, that opens the path to freedom, and exercises freedom through dialectical confrontation. It uses signs of the linguistic system, giving them a character of beauty, poetry that German idealists called aesthetics.

[Anonymous No.11237341]

>>11237327
this is the first 14 minutes of the video
I left out an interesting bit about comparative literature emerging from napoleon's France as a colonisation tool, inherited by the british and especially the americans after WW2, in which Europe maimed itself and gave the americans the world on a silver platter

[Anonymous No.11237361]

>>11234189
giving angloamericans the access to continental philosophy was a mistake

[Anonymous No.11237491]

https://youtu.be/UlW5Vu9GJyA?t=1h2m35s

Tomad nota, hegelianos.

[Anonymous No.11237621]

>intelectuales mexicanos

[Anonymous No.11237623]

>>11237621
He actually fucking rekts anglo critique culture

[Anonymous No.11237711]

>>11237621
he's Spanish, btw

[Anonymous No.11237733]

Anglos BTFO

ARRIBA ESPAÑA

[Anonymous No.11237746]

>>11234189
BASED meds

[Anonymous No.11237855]

>>11234189
>Pozzmodernidath aglosaghhhhona

Hell nah, this nigga eating Frijoles!

[Anonymous No.11237880]

>>11237491
Holy shit Hegel BTFO.

Me encanta lo cabreado que esta este tío.

[Anonymous No.11237916]

Por cierto esto que voy a preguntar es un tema fuera del hilo: ¿Alguien sabe el nombre de un autor español que se llama Julián noseque y que escribe cosas rollo James Joyce?

Salía en una imagen de un Iceberg de escritores, no se si alguien lo tendrá por ahí.

[Anonymous No.11238170]

lmaoing at all these anglo postmoderncucks mocking him for his way of speaking instead of his content

[Anonymous No.11238209]

>>11238170
>demands an answer to the "birth of literature"
>why cant whitey answer this!?? REEEEE

We're mocking his autism.

[Anonymous No.11238237]

>>11234189
quien carajo es este tipo? ayer busque una critica a derrida y salió este... Tiene pinta de ser buen tipo jaja

[Anonymous No.11238239]

>>11238209
no contribution, only attacks, perfectly in line with what he says in the video

[Anonymous No.11238242]

>>11237621
>white
>mexican
pick one

[Anonymous No.11238250]

>>11238239
he makes it easy.

[Anonymous No.11238257]

>>11234189
Ma mio amico, Io parlo español.

[Anonymous No.11238264]

>>11238250
he makes what easy?

[Anonymous No.11238267]

>>11238170
They can't comment on his content because they're all monolingual plebs.

[Anonymous No.11238282]

>>11238267
They see someone arguing against post modernism, they feel threatened but know they don't have the level of sophistry required to defend a post modern argument, so they reply with attacks in the shape of autistic 4chan lingo

[Anonymous No.11238583]

>>11238282
wow u relly smart. Except Yo entiendo el lenguaje español de mierda perfectamente, y se que un español no tiene ni un comino de gerencia para hablar del posmodernismo ni el origen de literatura, ni tampoco puede exigir que nadie se le pase por el forro explicar que es o de donde salio la literatura, cuando el mismo critica a los críticos. Qué se cree este man? No e leido su trabajo, acaso el a explicado el siginificado de la literatura? entonces me callo pero si no, que se coma un cerro de pijas.

>el posmodernismo dice que toda cultura es igual

De donde saco esa mierda?

[Anonymous No.11238598]

>>11238583
Vuelva usted a la escuela.

[Anonymous No.11238612]

>>11238583
>acaso el a explicado el siginificado de la literatura?

see >>11237327

[Anonymous No.11238633]

>>11237327
>post modernism itself since it stipulates that all cultures and literatures are equal
literally who has ever said that

[Anonymous No.11238657]

>>11238633
Eagleton says that literature is subjective

[Anonymous No.11238679]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ATmRUDk828

ESPAÑA NO ES UN MITO

[Anonymous No.11238683]

>>11234189
>traduccion
jejejeje

[Anonymous No.11238779]

>>11238633
>>11238583
>el posmodernismo dice que toda cultura es igual

It's a statement deducted from post modernism's relativist component, juxtaposed with comparative literature's colonist nature

[Anonymous No.11239138]

>>11238779
how good of him to deduct that. Too bad it's wrong.

[Anonymous No.11239190]

>>11238779
Ahí no me convenció su argumento porque lo toma en un sentido cualitativo literal. Para los poscolonialistas todas las literaturas son "iguales" porque no hay una jerárquicamente arriba de otra en un sentido hegemónico, y por ello es que abogan por una lectura de cada literatura en los términos propios de esa literatura y no de otra.

[Anonymous No.11239218]

>>11234189
>jejejeje
>Escuela de Oviedo
I didn't know lads on /lit/ knew about this.

[Anonymous No.11239236]

>>11239190
>Para los poscolonialistas todas las literaturas son "iguales" porque no hay una jerárquicamente arriba de otra en un sentido hegemónico
lo que el rechaza el del video es que se use una herramienta de imperalismo cultural desde un punto de vista post moderno que postula que todas las culturas son "isovalentes"
Lo que es mas o menos discutible es el caracter imperialista de la literatura comparativa

>>11239138
lmfao