[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 129 KB, 640x1136, IMG_3130.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11194914 No.11194914[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

It's okay guys his fans are still Reddit manchildren so we don't have to worry about our secret bookz getting ruined by the normies!!!1

>> No.11194920

He's the Elon Musk of /lit/, I can't wait until he starts on Joseph McElroy and this board abandons him.

>> No.11194926

when is he gonna read gravity's rainbow already

>> No.11194929

Stoner is just one of those overrated New Yorker book club novels /lit/ pretends to like but in reality no one reads it with any passion

>> No.11194934

>>11194929
I liked it

>> No.11194966

He browses /pol/ One time he rearranged the background objects as a nod to us.

>> No.11194971
File: 106 KB, 339x329, 2018-05-18 22.08.02.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11194971

>>11194929
>i don't like it so no one does
Retard

>> No.11194980

>>11194971
>>11194966
If you liked it please describe to me why. I'm willing to give it a second look

>> No.11194988

>>11194980
Once you realize Stoner was wrong with his attitudes toward other people then its easier to "get"

>> No.11194996

>>11194914
Why does he have to review 1984?
He is not some highly reputable book reviewer.

God fucking damn I started reading classics and non fiction because I wanted to escape the plebhood.
Should have better started reading fantasy shit just like any idiot.
Fuck you Felix, you just couldnt do it, first meme and now books
FUCK YOU

>> No.11195005

>>11194988
Thats very interesting but the question is why you believe the novel is worth reading

>> No.11195013

>>11194996
*clap clap* Yukio Mishima *clap clap*

>> No.11195023

>>11195013
stop it, my heart.

>> No.11195024

>>11194996
>God fucking damn I started reading classics and non fiction because I wanted to escape the plebhood.

What an absolutely moronic motivation. You're a designated pleb for this alone

>> No.11195030

BOOK!

REVIEW!

>> No.11195046

What books have you read in this month, guys?

>> No.11195047

>>11195024
I'm sorry that my motivation was not the same as yours. Ohh damn you are such a honorable girl.

>> No.11195052

>>11194914

He read Stoner. He's definitely in here. How else would he have got to stoner? He's literally following the japanese literature charts, the /lit/ 100 chart and the /lit/ core chart.

>> No.11195064

>>11195052
Stoner was part of Oprahs book club

>> No.11195065

>>11195047
Pleb, be quiet

>> No.11195071

>>11195052
Stoner is a very popular book. If you've ever been to a book store they usually have it presented

>> No.11195077

>>11195052
it's not like stoner is a huge fucking obscure book or something
if he reads something like DFW or pinecone then for sure he goes on /lit/

>> No.11195080
File: 23 KB, 600x450, 1527014704734[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11195080

>4chun manchildren calling out reddit manchildren in a thread about a vidya/kids tv presenter

>> No.11195090

>>11195080
>projecting this hard

>> No.11195091

>>11195080
clean that up, janny. it's your JOB.

>> No.11195097

>>11195080
Why do people cling to the idea that Pewdiepie is for kids? It's not fucking 2012 anymore, most of this fans are in his 20s.

>> No.11195100
File: 1.98 MB, 540x359, 1526990792370[1].gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11195100

>>11195090
projecting what?

>this board

>> No.11195101

>>11195097
becuase 80% of people who use youtube are kids.
solid statistics.

>> No.11195104

>>11195100
why are you eager to show moral superiority on a rice forum.
fucking mongus.

>> No.11195121
File: 22 KB, 381x380, 1527007200027[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11195121

>>11195097
he presents himself like a kids tv presenter. He may not be the hyperactive, screeching clusterfuck that he was a couple of years ago, but he definitely wouldn't look out of place on a kids show....albeit for 9-12yr olds instead of 5 yr olds.

>fans are in their twenties.
they need to grow up.

vidya is for kids
memes are for kids
chan culture is for kids
reddit is generally childish
etc
etc

>> No.11195131

>>11195104
To rustle some jimmies. To pop this stifling echochamber. To break-up the disgusting circle-jerk. To, maybe, provoke some emotionally stunted man-boy to look in the mirror and reassess his life (this won't happen)

>> No.11195149

>>11195097
t. manchild trying to justify to himself that it's okay that he watches PewDiePie in his 20's

>> No.11195151

>>11195101
You don't have Felix's analytics, you turkey.

>>11195121
nofunallowed.iso

>> No.11195157

>>11195149
Of course it's ok. He's funny and entertaining and give you 10 minutes of sillyness every day.

Sounds like you're just jealous your chair can't do this ____

>> No.11195162

>>11195151
>You don't have Felix's analytics, you turkey.
I dont fucking need to. Do you honestly think that most of his viewership is grown up? cmon you cant be serious.

>> No.11195164
File: 121 KB, 500x395, 1526316024178[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11195164

Why don't we have a /self-help/ and a /youtuber/ board?

>> No.11195168

>>11195157
>He's funny
how is he funny or entertaining. I would totally understand if you though Kevin Hard is funny but this fag?

>> No.11195187

>>11195162
Yes, I do.

>>11195168
Because he's silly and irreverent and makes fun of almost everything and everyone.

>> No.11195221

>>11195121
anime is not childish r-right?

>> No.11195226
File: 45 KB, 280x361, animation10[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11195226

>>11195187
kids tv presenter

>> No.11195243

>>11195221
Anime, comic books and superheroes. "Nerd culture" in its entirety is chronically infantilizing

>> No.11195247

>>11195187
how old are you?

>> No.11195252

>>11195247
I'm 29. I watch his videos every day. Really funny stuff.

>> No.11195259
File: 207 KB, 687x613, 1525942845870.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11195259

>>11195243
b-but I don't like the one for kids

>> No.11195268

Holy shit its not a crime to like entertainment like Felix or going on 4chan.

>> No.11195270

>>11194914
he needs to do anime reviews

>> No.11195271

>>11195252
oh so you have a mental problem, I'm sorry than.

>> No.11195272

>>11195259
shut it, weeb

>> No.11195274

>>11194988
No one's wrong with any attitudd, so how's that possible?

>> No.11195277

>>11195271
How do you spend your free time?

>> No.11195286

>>11195277
Masturbation and doing Math.

>> No.11195287
File: 37 KB, 327x499, 25.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11195287

He needs to drop Hegel onto his audience and bring society to the next era of zeigeist

>> No.11195294

>>11195271
No, I just like silliness. I'm sick of all comedy being "here's why Drumpf is finished!!" and Felix just posts nonsense and memes every day.

>> No.11195295

>>11194914
Review Mein Kampf

>> No.11195296

>>11194966
He's a chantard?
But he's a grown fucking man. He can grow a beard for fucks sake.

>> No.11195303

>>11195296
I'm as old as Felix and I'm engaged
Stop projecting your insecurities

>> No.11195304

>>11195294
>Felix just posts nonsense and memes every day
That he gets from his reddit, he doesnt even create any. He just recycles them.

>> No.11195307

>>11195294
Are you a girl?

>> No.11195309

>>11194914
>unironic pewdiepie threads on /lit/
thats it. i denied it for so long but this site is done.

>> No.11195317

>>11195309
Its a step up from John Green and that Mexican book scammer tai lopez

>> No.11195328 [DELETED] 
File: 118 KB, 1080x1080, 1526856634494[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11195328

>>11195303
>projection
nice strawman, peter-pan

>> No.11195337
File: 185 KB, 1083x720, 1522126891957.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11195337

>>11195272
Meanie

>> No.11195340

>>11195317
Funnily enough there's a significant overlap of people who complain about Pewdiepie and people that spam /lit/ about their toilet humour tier socialist podcasts.

>> No.11195347

>>11195328
>photoshopped
why are BLACKED enthusiasts so obsessed?

>> No.11195361

>>11195340
why are people even posting about yootoobers and podcasts on /lit/?
Its like they want to destroy the Gutenberg mind

>> No.11195372

>>11195361
They want /lit/ to become a ideological battleground after they murdered /co/ and have nowhere left to argue with one another.

>> No.11195378

>>11195328

holy shit! /lit/ has mods?

>> No.11195393

Pewdiepie has read more books this year than most most of these brain/lit/s read in two years

>> No.11195403

>>11195296
I've been growing a beard for 8 years. I've been browsing for longer.

>> No.11195577

>>11195340
>>11195372
t. underage poltard
Those people are literally too dumb to infest /lit/. That’s why they “took over” /co/, they can only consume and discuss kids entertainment.

>> No.11195595

>>11195337
grow up manlet

>> No.11195607

>>11195577
>Those people are literally too dumb to infest /lit/. That’s why they “took over” /co/, they can only consume and discuss kids entertainment.
Are you still talking about poltards or "le Trump is Voldemort" posters?

>> No.11195612

>>11194929
wrong

as an adult (someone who works and has children) the book will have more impact. all i have to do is think about Stoner's daughter and it chokes me up every time

>> No.11195756

I'm convinced he's a closet alt-righter.

>> No.11195788

>>11195268
it honestly should be. 4chan is far more dangerous than any drug

>> No.11195802

>>11195756
wow no way

>> No.11195812

>>11194996
>classics
>1984
>thinking reading fantasy isn't exclusively pleb

>> No.11195819

>>11195052
>>11195064
>>11195071
You're probably all right.

>> No.11195825

>>11195756
Fucking hope not.
He's reading Mishima, he should be a fascist. Not a faggy alt-kiker.

>> No.11195826

>>11195361
Because some guys on a podcast who made some /pol/ posters angry are releasing a book or something.

>> No.11196074

>>11195296
Nigger I’m in my 20’s.

I just like being able to drop in and out of threads and not be commited to it. 4chan is unironically a good way to not overcommit to the internet.

>> No.11196185

>>11194988
this dude's a retard. But I don't want to help anon to understanding, figure it out on your own. I don't care if you don't like the book I love.

>> No.11196189

>>11195819
*alt-right

>> No.11196201

>>11196074
we probably spend more time here than most other users spend on their favorite sites, this is hardly non-committal and you're encouraging anti-social behavior

>> No.11196398

>>11195309
I would take yahtzee crosshaw threads over this

>> No.11196427

>>11194980
Tbh if you don't cry at the end of this book, as you see the whole picture of this everyman's life holistically captured in all its glory and failure, then you have no heart.

>> No.11196453

>>11195077
DFW is still huge among the college liberal crowd
The real tell will be when he starts reading sub-meme maximalism like 2666 or JR

>> No.11196626
File: 1006 KB, 1105x1080, sketch-1525144864671.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11196626

The absolute state of a board that does nothing but vacillate from lamentations on the fact that good literature isn't more appreciated to histrionic wailing the second someone in the mainstream comes along that might propagate its appeal.

>> No.11196646

>>11196626
sorry, couldn't understand the words in your post but I bet it was shit anyway

>> No.11196652

>>11196626
The problem isn't that nobody appreciates literature anymore, the problem is that people are becoming more and more unable to appreciate it. No matter how hard they may try (and most won't even do this). The average person's ability to focus on a long piece of text yas become abysmal, so even if some faggot tells them to read they won't be properly equipped to do so.

>> No.11196680

How the fuck am I supposed to pretend to be superior and literary with the memes I've picked up from /lit/ if this fucking youtube cunt is spreading them about for everyone to devour? I've only read about two or three of them, and if everyone else reads them too, it's meaningless. Fuck you, Pewpewfaggot.

>> No.11196691

>>11196680
You are not superior and so you should not feel superior. He's doing you a favour. Join the masses or get to work.

>> No.11196706

>>11195252
Honestly, that's pathetic.
Don't even mean it as an insult

>> No.11196715

>>11196691
>so you should not
What else have you got on those tablets, Moses?

>> No.11196731

>>11195756
>closet
He is as subtle as a hammer to the face. The faggot got his brain melted by /pol/shit

>> No.11196742

>>11196715
Yeah, keep your dirty mitts off my missus.

>> No.11196777

>>11195164
/adv/

>> No.11197300

>>11196626
I think the issue is the type of people who will be getting involved. No one wants to become associated with those they despise.

If it was a prestigious institution starting some sort of literature program that meets in person and then posts the book reviews/discussions on youtube or any other streaming site accessible to /lit, /lit would jizz itself not only with validation, but with the quality of discussion being introduced.

People who were drawn towards and watch pewdiepie are the people who are from a culture and mindset that 4chan despises. To introduce /lit's most prized and uniting factors to these people is to threaten the identity that /lit or 4chan has constructed in response to rejecting the values and ways of the "plebs" or "normies".

/Lit must now only hope or trust that the books content will filter out those that were initially despised because to have them assimilate into their culture is to be infiltrated.

This is the reason for the adverse reaction. I think that it is a shame that Pewdiepie is the one introducing people, but I hope that there are good minds who become involved.

I also think that /lit has some sort of superiority complex with these books, where they feel by reading and understanding these books, they are superior to those who were not initially or naturally drawn to them.

"Anyway, that's what I think guys, don't forget to *points to side of video* click on the yellow subscribe button over there and drop me a comment down below with your thoughts. See you next time, when we review Heideggerian rejection of the spoooooky nothing!"

Lol. It's almost comical that they'll be reading the same texts no matter how basic or foundational they are, especially when these people are contrasted with /lit's casual use of "niggers" and holocaust skepticism strewn about.

>> No.11197334

>>11197300

Also, I forgot to add to my post that I watched his video reviewing crime and punishment, and I found his reviews to be quite shallow. He just discusses the plot and anything he likes or doesn't like about the book. It is unclear whether he takes away any message deeper than those presented most apparently.

>> No.11197357

>>11197300
based post