[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 148 KB, 751x396, Globe_of_language.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11164465 No.11164465 [Reply] [Original]

What's the most /lit/ language?

>> No.11164479

>>11164465
संस्कृतम्

>> No.11164497

English

/thread

go home

>> No.11164543

This, but youre still an idiot for /threading your own post.

>> No.11164546

German

>> No.11164548

Polski

>> No.11164552

esperanto

>> No.11164609

French, English or Russian, or all the above

>> No.11164610

I dont know any German but its probably Chinese.

>> No.11164613

kay(f) bop(t)

>> No.11164655

>>11164465
slav
>тфв мoй cлoвapь этo плoхи
Ж У C T

>> No.11164775

>>11164465
>MY language of course

If you rate the /lit/ness of a language based on amount/quality of works written in it, it's most likely English, but if what you care about is the amount of /lit/erary devices it provides than the question becomes much more interesting. I think in the end it all comes back to the culture surrounding language and it's use, not the language itself, and any sufficiently developed language would be equally /lit/. Athough it could be argued some sets of rules help the development of complex cultural phenomena better than others I don't think the differences between modern languages are big enough to imact it. Out of the two languages I know well enough to analyse Polish is the more complex one, and in my experience the use of literary devices it provides over English doesn't lead to greater complexity of the graph of associations evoked than could be achieved using English. Don't get me wrong, it's completely different, I'm not speaking about translatability, but the percievable complexity of meaning behind the symbols was for me comparable when reading my favourite authors in those two languages.

>> No.11164781
File: 88 KB, 350x350, the son.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11164781

What is the most /lit/ language and why is it Hebrew?

>> No.11164784

>>11164465
Love

>> No.11164951

>>11164465
Latin, German, and English.

Definitely not Spanish or Russian.

>> No.11164953

Epic Greek

>> No.11165108

>>11164465
English is the most useful literary language due to the volume of translated work. Russian has the best native literary heritage.

>> No.11165230
File: 162 KB, 2894x2300, Beautiful.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11165230

>>11164784

>> No.11165373

>>11164479
this

>> No.11165380

>>11164465
>English>German>>Russian>French>>>Spanish>Italian

>> No.11165382

>>11164951
This, spanish is cancer and very few works make it look good.

t. Argie

>> No.11165402

>>11164465
Latin

>> No.11165406
File: 38 KB, 600x511, 6e5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11165406

>>11164655

>> No.11165432

>>11165108
I like to hope or imagine that Germans and French have translated more literature than we have. They have had more time, too. English was sheep shag speak until centuries after the French moved in.

I think the question is too complex to answer; if you narrowed it down to a time period or type of work it would be easier to answer. Japan has the most insular culture with a well developed, occasionally symbolic language, and are proven adaptable to modern literary trends, so I shit out this thought in lieu of an answer.

>> No.11165686

Romance languages

Every barbaric germanigger language sounds like shit.

>> No.11166359

1. memegreek
2. memescrit
3. japanese :)

>> No.11166393

>>11166359
>japanese
>the most famous literary work is naruto
really makes you think

>> No.11166533

>>11165382
Mientes.

>> No.11166547

>>11164479
एतत् सत्यं अस्ति

>> No.11166571

שפת כושי המדבר הזאת

>> No.11166575

german, shameless plug

>> No.11166589

Old English. Especially the alliterative verse. If you disagree you're a plebeian.

>> No.11166611

>OFFICIAL LANGUAGE POWER RANKINGS
1. Yiddish

>POWER GAP
200. Arabic
201. English (old)
202. Hindi
203. Chinese (Mandarin)
204. Japanese
205. French

>POWER GAP
999. Latin
1000. Modern English
1001. German

>POWER GAP
8999. Latin (its dead lmao)
9000. "Romantic" """"Languages""""

> POOOOOOOOOOOWER GAP
99001: Cyrillic Anything

>> No.11166618

>>11166611
preciate ya
and your satanic dubs

>> No.11166627

>>11166611
>Yiddish
N o p e

>> No.11166631

>>11166611
Yiddish basically is autistic German, you fucking moron.

>> No.11166636

>>11164781
Biblical Hebrew is great but the revived everyday language is shit. The vocabulary is so scarce and limiting and I prefer writing or talking in English.

Also, does this retard Shapiro even speak Hebrew?

>> No.11166639

>>11164465
>What's the most /lit/ language?
synthetic languages are objectively more expressive.

>> No.11166721
File: 85 KB, 400x550, as he chambered another round.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11166721

>>11166611
>basing the value of a language off of it's alphabet
lel

>> No.11166811

>>11166611
based

>> No.11166818

Portuguese.

>> No.11166899

𐐀𐑍𐑊𐐮𐑇 𐐺𐐳𐐻 𐐬𐑌𐑊𐐨 𐐮𐑌 𐑋𐐨𐑋 𐐰𐑊𐑁𐐰𐐺𐐯𐐻𐑅.

>> No.11166937

>>11166818
although this is my native language and I love it, I love italian more.
There is something special in reading theology texts in italian, reading things like The catechism of the catholic church or the psalms in italian is a joy in itself, which I don't find reading those texts in portuguese, spanish or english

>> No.11166938

>>11164655
Чeгo, лoл?

>> No.11167002

Sanskrit

>> No.11167010

>>11166611
>Arabic
>Not mentioning Persian way above Arabic
kys

>> No.11167012

>>11166533
Puedo estar equivocado pero no miento. Las únicas piezas literarias que no puedo imaginarme en otro idioma que no sea en español son los cuentos de borges y los poemas de quevedo y góngora

>> No.11167060

French or Latin.

Spanish comes close.

>> No.11167098
File: 111 KB, 1000x1181, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11167098

>>11164465
The logographic post-language which is currently developing from emoji and picrel. Letter plebs btfo.

>> No.11167136

Ironically English (irony as a quality not irony as a volition), unironically.

>> No.11167159
File: 304 KB, 1440x2560, Screenshot_20180517-080353.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11167159

18th century greentext