[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

File: 178 KB, 894x894, IMG_3962.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

11119987

Anonymous Tue May 8 09:39:09 2018 No.11119987 [Reply] [Original]

>had had

>>	Anonymous Tue May 8 10:35:49 2018 No.11120116 >>11119987 Brainlet

>>	Anonymous Tue May 8 10:38:49 2018 No.11120128 File: 320 KB, 640x444, 121.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11119987 >if that that had had that hadn't had that

>>	Anonymous Tue May 8 11:02:02 2018 No.11120195 >Did did

>>	Anonymous Tue May 8 11:09:42 2018 No.11120230 >>11119987 >implying overuse of the word had isn’t comfy as shit

>>	Anonymous Tue May 8 12:07:18 2018 No.11120451 The English language, ladies and gentlemen.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 8 12:08:57 2018 No.11120458 File: 12 KB, 600x500, 600px-Politiker_haften_fuer_ihre_Fluechtlinge.svg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11120195 >Did did Did do

>>	Anonymous Tue May 8 12:09:43 2018 No.11120461 >>11120458 NAZI

>>	Anonymous Tue May 8 12:13:54 2018 No.11120484 >>11119987 Nothing wrong with it; a legitimate pluperfect. >>11120230 > overuse Protip: there is only one verb there.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 8 12:17:55 2018 No.11120508 File: 8 KB, 749x324, deutsch.alt.codes.kurz.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11120451 >The English language, ladies and gentlemen. Willst du "hat gehabt" ein Bißchen besser?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 8 12:19:46 2018 No.11120512 File: 45 KB, 850x400, angry.white.woman.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11120484 >Protip: there is only one verb there. True enough, but the visual redundancy (and the aural redundancy if read aloud) is still there.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 8 13:11:53 2018 No.11120746 >>11120512 It isn't 'redundan't; it signifies the pluperfect. And in native speech, it almost always unstressed-stressed, so something along the lines of > əd'ad

>>	Anonymous Tue May 8 13:20:15 2018 No.11120783 well, well, well

>>	Anonymous Tue May 8 13:34:01 2018 No.11120819 >>11119987 It makes me so sadistically amused that someone is so upset at such a small thing. I’m now going to endeavor to use “had had” in my writing more.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 8 13:39:47 2018 No.11120836 >Phil major >Can get away with writing like an awkward autist as long as the ideas are clear

>>	Anonymous Tue May 8 13:40:28 2018 No.11120841 File: 227 KB, 600x679, devilish.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >is is

>>	Anonymous Tue May 8 16:02:28 2018 No.11121450 >>11120458 Done did

>>	Anonymous Tue May 8 16:31:53 2018 No.11121575 I was writing a short story and one sentence had had had had, but I realized how bad it sounded and just changed it to had.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 8 17:42:30 2018 No.11121882 >>11120508 >Willst du "hat gehabt" ein Bißchen besser? Heiliger....

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 00:06:36 2018 No.11123326 >>11120451 Absolutely nothing wrong with that phrase, it conveys meaning nicely and economically unlike a declension-heavier language like german where you'd have to use a 10 syllable abo-tier sentence to say exactly the same

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 00:11:26 2018 No.11123348 >>11121575 If you wrote a story that had had had had had had you should probably give up

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 00:36:32 2018 No.11123437 >James, while John had had "had", had had "had had"; "had had" had had a better effect on the teacher.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 03:23:54 2018 No.11123883 >>11119987 Use this in a sentence please

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 03:26:53 2018 No.11123892 >>11123883 "He had had better pussy in his youth, but this pussy was new."

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 03:28:24 2018 No.11123896 >it it

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 03:29:53 2018 No.11123903 >the the

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 04:44:43 2018 No.11124161 >>11123326 OH NONONONO

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 04:53:27 2018 No.11124188 >>11119987 nothing wrong with it u poofta

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 05:03:26 2018 No.11124210 Guess I'll ask my question in this thread. Is "we describe here" correct ? Can I use this in a formal document ?

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 05:07:24 2018 No.11124217 >right right

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 06:05:04 2018 No.11124361 >>11120508 >Gehirnlein probiert Deutsch zu schreiben einfach laecherlich

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 06:08:33 2018 No.11124370 >>11124210 Yes, it's fine.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 06:24:20 2018 No.11124410 File: 15 KB, 400x400, 1513631789994.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11124370 Thanks my friend.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 06:26:50 2018 No.11124419 >>11119987 He had had "had you really?" posed to him as a question.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 06:27:53 2018 No.11124421 >>11123437 based

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 06:33:02 2018 No.11124443 had had = had that that = that

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 06:35:04 2018 No.11124448 File: 260 KB, 593x635, 1500093877696.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >what it was was that that had had a bad effect on him

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 06:47:11 2018 No.11124480 >>11124448 > What is punctuation?

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 06:56:14 2018 No.11124509 >>11124210 god I hope you're not a technical writer.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 07:05:10 2018 No.11124539 >>11124509 What's wrong with that ?

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 07:05:16 2018 No.11124540 >>11124480 Sorry, fixed >what it was was that that had had a bad effect on him.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 07:28:08 2018 No.11124587 >>11124540 >work in trades store >customers come in to order stuff >give list of stuff they need >product a, 3 off >product b, 5 off >off, not of? Why?

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 07:53:42 2018 No.11124658 >>11124448 saving this one for future use, thanks

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 08:08:55 2018 No.11124695 >>11124540 > That ‘had had’ had had a bad effect on him.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 08:35:18 2018 No.11124766 File: 124 KB, 321x262, 2+2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] off of

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 09:57:50 2018 No.11125011 File: 14 KB, 400x400, tfYXvUxC_400x400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11119987 >"Oh," he said,

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 11:10:44 2018 No.11125273 >>11123892 "OP had had dreams about fucking Stacey, but this was a fleshlight. As Usual."

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 11:13:54 2018 No.11125285 >>11124587 They did not want the product to be ON

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 15:14:22 2018 No.11126307 >that that

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 15:29:50 2018 No.11126370 >>11124448 Kino.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 9 16:18:49 2018 No.11126573 >do do lmao >I do do that that I had had done