[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 31 KB, 347x500, 41D3+dvRL4L.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11103432 No.11103432 [Reply] [Original]

Has anyone read this?

>Writing at the time of the collapse of the Roman Empire, St. Augustine both revolutionized and brought to a close antiquity's idea of freedom. A man was not a slave by nature or by law, as Aristotle claimed. His freedom was a function of his moral state. A man had as many masters as he had vices. This insight would provide the basis for the most sophisticated form of social control known to man.
Fourteen hundred years later, in a world eager to reject the intellectual patrimony of the West, a decadent French aristocrat turned that tradition on its head when he wrote that "the freest of people are they who are most friendly to murder". Like St. Augustine, the Marquis de Sade would agree that freedom was a function of morals. Freedom for the Marquis de Sade, however, meant willingness to reject the moral law. Unlike St. Augustine, the Marquis de Sade proposed a revolution in sexual morals to accompany the political revolution then taking place in France. Libido Dominandi -- the term is taken from Book I of Augustine's City of God -- is the definitive history of that sexual revolution, from 1773 to the present.

>Unlike the standard version of sexual revolution, Libido Dominandi shows how sexual liberation was from its inception a form of control. The logic is clear enough: Those who wished to liberate man from the moral order needed to impose social controls as soon as they succeeded because liberated libido led inevitably to anarchy. Over the course of two hundred years, those techniques became more and more refined, eventuating in a world where people were controlled, not by military force, but by the skillful management of their passions. It was Aldous Huxley who wrote in his prefaceto the 1946 edition of Brave New World that "as political and economic freedom diminishes, sexual freedom tends compensatingly to increase". This book is about the converse of that statement. It explains how the rhetoric of sexual freedom was used to engineer a system of covert political and social control. Over the course of the two-hundred-year span covered by this book, the development of technologies of communication, reproduction, and psychic control -- including psychotherapy, behaviorism, advertising, sensitivity training, pornography, and, when push came to shove, plain old blackmail -- allowed the Enlightenment and its heirs to turn Augustine's insight on its head and create masters out of men's vices. Libido Dominandi is the story of how that happened.

>> No.11103600

>>11103432
I haven't but E Michael Jones is total bro teir, definantly will be worth your time

>> No.11103629

>>11103432
Only E Micheal Jones book ive read but its excellent. He has a pathology that compels him to consider problems that affect society broadly as a specific attack on catholicism but its easy to look past if not a little charming

>> No.11103634

>>11103629
>>11103600
he seems borderline conspiracy theorist tho? is he not just a pol nutjob?

>> No.11103646

>Libido Dominandi is the first draft of a great work. As it is, it is a failure, suffering from shoddy writing, poor research, and a wandering and inconsistent thesis. What should be an erudite and compelling polemic against the the sexual revolution—Western culture’s death knell—is an inconsistent and often unreadable mess.

https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/1906990944

>> No.11103651

>>11103646
I expected nothing less from a declinist genre book. All too good to be true.

>> No.11103652

>>11103634
You seem like a retarded faggot that's for sure

>> No.11103666

>>11103634
hes not conspiracy theory tier hes more in that area of underground history/analysis

>> No.11103677

>>11103666
>underground history/analysis
You know he sounds like he's a rejected historian when you frame it like that.

>> No.11103728

imagine looking around modern world and saying
>this needs more logos

there was an undermination of eros. it must be restored to its previous rich meaning which involved more than just sexual desire. freud didnt attack logos, he reduced renaissance eros of ficino or bruno to perverted shtetl version.

>> No.11103741

>>11103677
its like the napoleon quote, history is a set of lies that people have agreed upon. the fact that the mainstream narratives come out of universities which are so influenced by money and ideology makes the dissidents equally or arguably more important. if you want to see an example of history being written by the victors go to any bookstore and pickup a history book by a contemporary historian and youll find them retroactively making the nation/area theyre dealing with PC. Andalusia/central asia/poland or whatever 'were the most tolerant an humanistic societies of their age'. Jones is definitely crude but I don't agree with that review, the book has a fairly straightforward narrative in that its a series of biographies jones considers important in a chronological fashion. maybe its guilty of digressions in that he focuses so much time writing the biographies to the disadvantage of his arguments but the biographies are so interesting in their own right that the book remains compelling. I don't imagine there was much money put into editing his books though

>> No.11103948

>>11103634
No he is not you retard

>> No.11104416

>>11103651
Stop posting in every "declinist" thread you fucking twat.