[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 164 KB, 1200x1483, Strindberg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11088432 No.11088432 [Reply] [Original]

>Characteristically, visiting Germany in 1884, he was delighted to note that the country refused to permit women to register as students at universities. And he coarsely urged legislators not to fall into the trap of “granting civic rights to semi-apes, inferior creatures, sick children, sick and insane thirteen times a year at the time of menstruation, completely out of their minds during pregnancy, and irresponsible during the rest of their life, unconscious criminals, criminal, instinctively malicious animals who do not even know that that is what they are.”

What did he mean by this?

>> No.11088841

>>11088432
He wants the Boy Scouts to be for boys - is that s wrong?

>> No.11088878

Based

>> No.11088963

>>11088432
He meant that his mommy was VERY mean to him when he was little.

>> No.11088976

>sick and insane thirteen times a year at the time of menstruation
>mfw women will openly admit to this yet still think they could keep things together better than men

>> No.11089047

>>11088976
Connecting the dots hasn't been any of their assets.

>> No.11089052

>>11088976
>men kill themselves more than women by a large margin
>despite this fact they feel they are less neurotic and more stable than women

>> No.11089056

>>11089052
Notice how many of those men are married?

>> No.11089059
File: 123 KB, 1024x789, best.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11089059

>>11089052
You know, most suicidal men are burdens to society. It's literally an asset of ours.
't was my privilege.

>> No.11089061

>>11088432
Let me start a thread to hate women hehe i am so funny!

Piss off

>> No.11089069

>>11089056
So youre saying marriage is an untenable institution that kills men?

>> No.11089074

>>11089059
>burdens to society
By what metric?

>> No.11089079
File: 375 KB, 2000x979, mon_005.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11089079

>>11089074
Any.

>> No.11089086
File: 23 KB, 627x672, 1519375580629.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11089086

>>11088432
Wish we could turn back time.

>>11089052
>>11089061
You'll have to go back.

>> No.11089173

>>11089069
>So youre saying
Why are women like this?

>> No.11089224

>>11089052
>women commit suicide more often than men
>less successful at that too

>> No.11089253

If anything is a testament to the short-sightedness of women, it's the fact that there used to be a plant which grew around the mediterrannean that prevented pregnancy and induced abortions when consumed. That plant is extinct now.

>> No.11089313

play me on fortnite br klas

i smell your furry paws and we awooo

>> No.11089315

>>11089173
>the Socratic dialogue is a feminine thing
Just because you are a man doesn't make you smart.

>> No.11089349

>>11089052
>men kill themselves more than women
This is because women are unbearable to be around, hence men kill themselves. Whereas men are great to be around so women don't want to commit suicide.

>> No.11089350

>>11089315
Just because you are a woman doesn't make you an adult.

>> No.11089361

>>11089315
>the Socratic dialogue is a feminine thing
You presupposed knowledge, not ignorance.

>> No.11089376

>>11089350
>defending the Socratic method makes you a women
Truly lit is the land of the enlightened.

>>11089361
The Socratic dialogue is a method and you just called it womanish. Whatever I believe is irrelevant to that observation. Also you are the one presupposing knowledge, that was my first post in this thread.

>> No.11089429

>>11089349
Congrats, you won the 4chan.

>> No.11089445

>>11089376
>and you just called it womanish
>you just called it x
I did not.

>> No.11089467

>>11089445
>So youre saying
>Why are women like this?
You are literally saying why do women use the Socratic method.

>> No.11089471

>>11089467
>So you're saying
What I'm saying is that's not the Socratic method. That's passive-aggressive nonsense and poisoning the well.

>> No.11089507

>>11089471
I don't see how it's passive aggressive. Considering the strength of your condemnation of women it seems like a fair question to ask to clarify your position. You're the one being passive aggressive by attacking that person as a women instead of answering the question.

>> No.11089514

>>11089507
>Considering the strength of your condemnation of women
"Why are women like this"?

>> No.11089532

>>11089514
Why are women like this? I mean why do they have to resort to passive aggressiveness instead of an argument. Is it because they don't understand logic?

>> No.11089544

>>11089052
we know this is the case from cog psyche studies, men are less neurotic than women. suicide stems from depression and low incentive to persist after social defeat. women are perpetually offered resources for being women so they remain in the world. men are told to accept slaver/abject povetty and inceldom or die, so they choose the latter as its significantly less suffering

>> No.11089678

>>11089532
I don't know, hence why I'm asking.

>> No.11089712

>>11089052
women try to kill themselves more, they just suck at it