[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 493 KB, 1464x1986, NEETche.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11060728 No.11060728 [Reply] [Original]

>Make up stuff
>Call it history to gain a high group
>Make a retarded argument based on his made up facts
>Gets called for his bullshit
>DUDE THE IDEAS IS WHAT MATTER LMAO FACTS ARE WORTHLESS
Why is this hack taken seriously?
Pick unrelated I was talking about Faulcault

>> No.11060746

>>11060728
Wow Foucault absolutely BTFO by a random 4chan poster

>> No.11060777

>>11060746
>Based his entire philosophy on history
>The veracity of it is not important
It is a logical falicy. It is basically building an strawman to justify your fucked up ideas

>> No.11060787

>>11060728
You make up stuff here, fucking nonce.

>> No.11060793

>>11060728
I challenge you to refute one single thing of his work

>> No.11060799

That applies to Nietzsche just as well. Foucault was a worthy successor.

>> No.11060801

>>11060787
Have you even read his book? Half of it is he doing halfassed history and openly making stuff up when needed and the rest is just justifying his fagottry and his dementia.

>> No.11060808

>>11060777
You clearly haven't read a single thing by him, you dumb fuck

>> No.11060810

>>11060793
Anything is refutable in his work as it is openly falsible. He just used
> muh power is the only thing that matters lmao
and
> muh ideas>facts madafacca
When anyone tried to refute him. He should not be taken seriously

>> No.11060814

>>11060810
>reductionism

haha

>> No.11060817

>>11060808
>>11060801
Unfortunatly I have. He is a lier,a lunatic and a sick individual that refused to get his HIV treated because he thought it was an invention to oppress faggots

>> No.11060818

Niggas dont read Nietzsche on this board. This is bait at best.

>> No.11060826

>>11060814
He just built 2 strawmans based on his work which is based on a massive strawman to justify everything he said. When people like Derrida make a substantial criticism of his work he just reduced his argument to
>Muh powah madafacca
To not engage in a real intelectual debate

>> No.11060864

>>11060728
Lmao.

>> No.11060873

>>11060728
That last line was a stroke of genius. The funniest thing I've read on here. Thanks, OP.