[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 464 KB, 3264x1852, BooksListOrder.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11024550 No.11024550 [Reply] [Original]

Fuck you I made the best list of books ever, suck my dick.
Debate me.

>> No.11024747

>>11024550
>no Anscombe nor MacIntyre in Philosophy
>no theology section
>no bible
Could be incorrect, because this is a list for ants.
But bugger off, redo it

>> No.11024764
File: 273 KB, 900x600, readingroom.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11024764

no fuck you this is actually an excellent list

so go fuck yourself instead you well-read patrician gentleman

>> No.11024777

Those aren't the best books ever

>> No.11024854

Please add "Genealogy of Morals" by Nietzsche or put it insteas of BYGAE

>> No.11024857

>>11024777
Prove it pussy
>>11024747
Sorry I don't read Jewish books

>> No.11024861

>>11024857
>Prove it pussy
burden of proof
>>11024857
>Sorry I don't read Jewish books
you degraded you bait with that

>> No.11024864
File: 31 KB, 349x500, f2b672b3416bdcddf50e23a33eb32c9a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11024864

>>11024550
>No Godel's Proof

>> No.11024867

>>11024550
LOL at the last 10+ entries in the "core" section

>> No.11024871

>>11024857
Don't diss trips, fucko.

>> No.11024883

>>11024871
no one on /lit/ checks them, we aren't 14 year olds anymore nor are we on /b/ anymore

diff anon btw

>> No.11024905
File: 906 KB, 2953x1969, (((Schulz))).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11024905

>>11024867
Knowing why democracy is garbage and knowing why you with a list of other people are garbage and unqualified to vote, but do so inspite of the fact, is why those 10+ books are there.

>> No.11024950

>>11024905
nigga then why didn't you put Hoppe, Mises, or Kuehnelt-Leddihn on there???

those austrian megaminds are the kingpins of taking gigantic craps on democracy

>> No.11024957
File: 459 KB, 700x394, Abo5.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11024957

>>11024950
Those are there you DUMB FUCK look
Look before you speak RETARD

>> No.11024959

>>11024764
mmm sounds a lot like samefagging

>> No.11024962

>>11024550
>atlas fugged

and you made me look at all that

>> No.11024963

>>11024550
>military
>no Ernst Junger

>> No.11025002
File: 45 KB, 50x28, ANTS.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11025002

>>11024957
Don't act like that this shit wasn't made for ANTS

>> No.11025006

>>11025002
>464 KB, 3264x1852
>ants
Okay faggot, open in a new window.
Glad to see there's redditors here.

>> No.11025021

>>11024550

"hey why isn't Guerilla Warfare in the Military section I think you're just a right-wing guy who-

>eye naturally drifts toward the top center of the "supplemental" section

o-okay

I also literally thought of Mao's little red book immediately after this without having seen it and yep.

(the next task is to see whether a single female author is present anywhere whatsoever in the list. If not, then this augers well for the OP's credibility on what is already on its face a very substantive list, though the fascinations with Evola and Houellebecq are a bit odd and out of place for this type of thing.)

>> No.11025037

>>11024963
>junger
this list is pretty shit but adding junger will just make it worse lol

>> No.11025043
File: 78 KB, 1280x510, 1521974988437.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11025043

>5 evola books
this image is forever relevant

>> No.11025045

>>11025037
OH really, what's shit about the list?
Where's your stack or list?

>> No.11025069

>>11025045
i dont have the effort to elaborate super hard but the core and philosophy sections stand out as missing a lot of important texts and having a lot of awful useless reads desu

>> No.11025082
File: 285 KB, 1000x800, Pepe283.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11025082

>>11025069
Then go ahead
I spent the time to make the list, go ahead and point out the "important texts" I'm missing.
Go ahead faggot.
I hope to god you're not looking at the supplemental sections and thinking those are the only philosophical books.

>> No.11025091

>>11025082
>being this fragile
have fun with your list bud

>> No.11025093

Clearly written by an edgy teenager for other edgy teenagers.

>>11025043
When people first started shilling Evola on the internet I went on and read all his books available for download. I will never get that time back as it was some of the most retarded shit I have ever read.

>> No.11025095

no Christian history?
I suggest to you A History of Christian Thought by Justo Gonzales

>> No.11025105

>>11025091
That's what I thought faggot.
Bye bitch, thanks for playing.
>>11025095
Not worth in my opinion, I just pick the figures of Christianity I like.
Such as Charlemagne or Vlad the Impaler.

>> No.11025107

>>11025093
being really into evola is truly the most brainlet thing you can do

>> No.11025108

>>11025105
a survey of Christianity would help someone establish which figures they want to look into though

>> No.11025117

>>11025105
Man, your opinion just keeps getting worse and worse

>> No.11025135
File: 26 KB, 400x300, ed_is_here.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11025135

>>11024550
>suck my dick.
Sure

>Debate me.
Absolutely not.

>> No.11025150

>>11024857
>I don't read jewish books
You have a drug section, goy.

>> No.11025165
File: 3.72 MB, 347x244, 00.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11025165

>>11025117
Still yet to provide an opinion.
Someone has been reading too much from the frankfurt school of thought.
>This much whiny critiquing
>nothing else offered up
Jewish, calling it now.
>>11025150
Goyim goyim goyim, the drug section is to educate people on the effects of drugs without doing them, taking away their curiosity.

>> No.11025179

>>11025165
well the frankfurt school did provide the most important foundational philosophy of the 20th century, so yes, like most people who aren't retarded I am a fan

>> No.11025184

>>11024550
What the actual fuck is the History section?

Macaulay's Lays of Ancient Rome are narrative poems. Why not put Macaulay's History of England, arguably the best work of history written in the English language aside from Gibbon's Decline and Fall.

Speaking of Gibbon, how the fuck can you defend putting DOUGLAS MURRAY'S STRANGE DEATH OF EUROPE on there and NOT Gibbon? Neck yourself.

Glad you mentioned Burke, but why the fuck did you mention him here?

The rest is garbage contemporary pop history

>> No.11025191

>>11024861
You realise burden of proof is a legal term, and only applies to courtrooms, it means nothing in simple discussion or argument.

>> No.11025197

>>11025191
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(law)

>> No.11025200
File: 73 KB, 600x512, Billy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11025200

>>11025184
>Glad you mentioned Burke, but why the fuck did you mention him here?
Why? What's the deal with Burke?

>> No.11025205

>>11025184
Gibbon is full of shit and only interesting if you want to learn about 18th century Britain.

>> No.11025212

>>11025082
You're missing CLRS under ai. And analysis under math. I'm sure there are plenty of other oversights

>> No.11025237
File: 21 KB, 272x347, Varg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11025237

>has a 'drugs' section
>has an 'AI' section

>> No.11025265

>>11024550
>middle east/india
D R O P P E D D R O P P E D
R O P P E D R O P P E D
O P P E D O P P E D
P P E D P P E D
P E D P E D
E D E D
D D
D D
E D E D
P E D P E D
P P E D P P E D
O P P E D O P P E D
R O P P E D R O P P E D
D R O P P E D D R O P P E D

>> No.11025283

>>11024550
>popper
>>>/trash/

>> No.11025290

>>11025205
>the greatest work of history ever written is full of shit

Imagine being this retarded

>> No.11025364

>>11025283
unironically underated reply

>> No.11025371

>>11025265
Why

>> No.11025502

>>11025371
India and the middle east are quite different and I don't think they should be classified in the same sub-category. India has it's own very distinct literature/historical mythology and culture that doesn't really relate to the middle east. Pakistani literature is probably the only type of literature that would be infused with both indian and middle-eastern elements.

>> No.11025791

>"kids"
>no Holes.

>> No.11026099

epic.... simply epic...

>> No.11026533

>>11024550
May want to include USMC's Warfighting.

>> No.11026621

>>11024550
I have obscure interests not related to common literature.
Fight me.

>> No.11026749

>>11024550
>>11024857
>kierkegaard
>dosto
>"Sorry I don't read Jewish books"
banable

>> No.11026804

>>11025791
Holes are for adults only

>> No.11026863

>>11026533
Yeah and/or replace the army instruction with the USMC 3-11.2 .
Also maybe add On War by Van Clausewitz under military and Zen and Japanese Culture by D.T. Suzuki under Eastern

>> No.11026869

>>11024550
It's not even a quarter of the western canon, try again brainlet.
Also
>Spending time on making lists instead of reading

>> No.11026876

>military
>Like 20 books
Jesus are all of you NEET? who the fuck would waste that much of their time? Who?

>> No.11026893

>>11025006
Clearly the criticism was aimed at the list, the text itself, over the dimensions of the image.

>> No.11026926

>Kipling

>> No.11026957

>>11024550
No Ovid??

>> No.11026990

>>11024550
This might come to be very useful OP.

>> No.11026994
File: 90 KB, 605x605, 8E508A54-0BEC-461D-B722-A7DDE856AE30.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11026994

All these faggots bringing up obscure shitty authors, but notice not one of them has brought up a major author.
Lmao
How does it feel to be defeated by a list?

>> No.11027003
File: 1.88 MB, 250x277, 2EDE9303-EA33-4A68-8AD6-02FE1602870F.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11027003

People are still making books anon
Unless you’re willing to update this list after reading recently released books then it’s clearly not that good

>> No.11027012

>>11026994
I am quite mad about the omission of Ovid.

>> No.11027015
File: 3.23 MB, 4032x3024, 4B9C406B-01DC-4D97-A097-2575236B4FC3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11027015

>>11027003
You basically just admitted I made the end all be all list for all books out atm. You realize that right?

>> No.11027032

>>11027015
At the moment is still not forever
I haven’t read all the books on your list yet so I can’t refute your taste but you sure as fuck haven’t read every book to exist so I can refute your bravado

>> No.11027052
File: 660 KB, 2100x1575, 4650C425-97EC-489B-A6EF-62AA6AF4C09A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11027052

>>11027032
You just gave me the book equivalent of the god of the gaps argument, lmao.

>> No.11027053

>>11024550
>philosophy
t. pleb

>> No.11027056
File: 329 KB, 1600x1581, bloom_genius_acurat_large4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11027056

>ripping off based bloom
the state of OP

>> No.11027059

>>11027053
>yfw /lit/ is filled with efette unthinking parasites who feel blithe cognoscenti resignation and glib irony is the pinnacle of affective states

>> No.11027063

No Nibelungenlied?

>> No.11027074

>>11027063
Read again, bottom left under “assorted works” of the author

>> No.11027466
File: 513 KB, 800x600, now with self-critique of Forms!.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11027466

>ctrl+f "Plato"
>0 results
Really? You only put the "Republic" on there? Not, say, the "Meno" — which introduced still-unsolved problems of epistemology — or the "Symposium" — the foundational text on the philosophy of love — or the "Phaedo" — which anticipated Kant's 'synthetic a priori' issue by MILLENNIA — or etc., etc.

I can't even look at a chart that begins with such plebeianism. Get a fucking grip, man.

>> No.11027495

Philosophyfags need to fucking purged

>> No.11027819

>>11027495
if you read actual literature, 97% of the authors and their books are heavy on philosophy, wether you like it/recognize it or not, so purge yourself

>> No.11027833

>>11027466
Gay just go straight to kant fuck the rest

>> No.11027892
File: 59 KB, 853x619, 1505219923775.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11027892

>>11024550
>psychology
>no Jaan Valsiner

Get with the times, the revolution is now!

>> No.11029112

>>11027892
Looks like a load of memes.
I declare myself better than /lit/
As in 78 posts in not ONE could tell me the list was shit.

>> No.11029142

>>11029112
The list is shit; it's made by a faggot that didn't read half of them and should kill himself for redemption.

>> No.11029152

>>11029112
>>11029142
And you include a section on "AI" but nothing resembling Computer Science.

>> No.11029211

>>11029152
Because it says AI and not computer science you daft cunt
>>11029142
Not an argument, kys.
Show me where I went wrong or one better list.

>> No.11029354

>>11029211
I'll be fair and say that it's a nice list, and someone obviously put some effort in it.

However, there is no point in listing off 40 science textbooks that you haven't worked through: science is meant to be done not read about. So, you can't say one textbook is better than another (since it's a pedagogic tool, and there will not be a single best answer for everyone).

The AI section is just books that no one will remember in 40 years, so just delete it. We do not know how to create an *intelligent* program (machine), and we don't know what it will look like. It's _not_ deep learning, not even close.

It's a better aim to understand the theory of computation, and computational processes. A person could read every single book on your list and not understand how computer programs work, or how to the behavior of computational processes. Without that, the "AI" section is just empty hype, really. Maybe there is some substance there, but I'm betting against it.

I'll save the list, anon, it's nice.

How do you define _the best list of books_. Can I beat yours by adding 50 more?

>> No.11029380
File: 2.54 MB, 3024x4032, 54101140575__69AD86D6-D65B-4E99-91FE-A4F3A061FC5E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11029380

>>11024550
Bad post, dumb superficial list
>>11024857
Beyond awful post

Mental child, here have the attention you so desperately crave.

>> No.11029397

>>11029354
>*how to understand the behavior

>> No.11029440

>>11024550
why not 'calculus lipmen bers' under math?

>> No.11029455

>>11029380
R E T A R D
E
T
A
R
D