卐 卍 卐 卍 卐 卍 卐 卍

[Anonymous No.11017230]

Can anyone recommend me some works of Natsoc/Aryan philosophy? Esoterism not so much, but if you can recommend some too, go ahead.

[Anonymous No.11017233]

yeah reddit.com

[Anonymous No.11017238]

nietzsche

[Anonymous No.11017285]

is that the mundus autistialis fag

[Anonymous No.11017288]

anything on this page or on the site in general
aryanism.net/archive/books
I assume you've read Mundus Millennialis based on your post, but I'll link it for others
mundusmillennialis.com
Some other works that I've been reading recently include "Race Life of the Aryan Peoples" and "Aryan Idols."

Listen to Wagner

[Anonymous No.11017310]

>>11017230
The buddha was light skinned with blue eyes. Literally a descendant of the indoaryans.

>>11017238
This. Nietzsche was actually the one to found the naziparty. Of course back then it was still a monastic order because Nietzsche was DEVOUT to traditionalism. But since he put the state over the individual and preached people to follow the herd as long as it benefits the state it's all good.
Always remember his teachings about denying your own life to live through your children.

[Anonymous No.11017388]

>>11017310
You've got no clue of what you're posting about.

[Anonymous No.11017413]

>>11017388
He was though. Do you know WHY they are called indoaryans? That he had blue eyes is confirmed too.
Inwas pretending that op asking for aryan philosophy is not retarded hence that answer.

If you mean the nietzsche stuff it is obviously pointing out the retardation necessary to call nietzsche a naziphilosopher

[Anonymous No.11017461]

>>11017230
Primary/Contemporary Sources-
The Myth of the Twentieth Century by Alfred Rosenberg
Hitler's Table Talks by Adolf Hitler
Wotan by CG Jung
The Goebbels Diaries by Joseph Goebbels

Origins of Aryanist Thought-
Judaism in Music and Other Essays by Richard Wagner
The World as Will and Representation by Arthur Schopenhauer
The Antichrist by Friedrich Nietzsche
The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century by Houston Stewart Chamberlain
An Essay on the Inequality of the Human Races by Arthur de Gobineau
Preussentum und Sozialismus by Oswald Spengler
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion by Anonymous

Esoteric Sources-
Nos, Book of Resurrection by Miguel Serrano
The Lightning and the Sun by Satrivi Devi

Other Writings (Mostly Postwar)-
Man and His Symbols by CG Jung
The Red Book by CG Jung
The Decline of the West by Oswald Spengler
Imperium by Francis Yockey
Gold in the Furnace by Satrivi Devi
The Hero with A Thousand Faces of Joseph Campbell

Mostly listed within order of importance, obviously not a complete list. A lot of these are not things that should be read on their own if you want to get the most out of them.

[Anonymous No.11017475]

>>11017461
tl;dr

crystal reading bullshit for recluse white teens

[Anonymous No.11017493]

>>11017475
>Coming to a literature board to make fun of people who read books

[Anonymous No.11017506]

>>11017461
((((ROSENBERG))))

[Anonymous No.11017510]

>>11017493
ah yes I forgot that the group of people-who-read are the most virtuous lot

[Anonymous No.11017526]

Somewhere there are still peoples and herds, but not with us, my brethren: here there are states.

A state? What is that? Well! open now your ears unto me, for now will I say unto you my word concerning the death of peoples.

A state, is called the coldest of all cold monsters. Coldly lieth it also; and this lie creepeth from its mouth: "I, the state, am the people."

It is a lie! Creators were they who created peoples, and hung a faith and a love over them: thus they served life.

Destroyers, are they who lay snares for many, and call it the state: they hang a sword and a hundred cravings over them.

Where there is still a people, there the state is not understood, but hated as the evil eye, and as sin against laws and customs.

This sign I give unto you: every people speaketh its language of good and evil: this its neighbour understandeth not. Its language hath it devised for itself in laws and customs.

But the state lieth in all languages of good and evil; and whatever it saith it lieth; and whatever it hath it hath stolen.

False is everything in it; with stolen teeth it biteth, the biting one. False are even its bowels.

Confusion of language of good and evil; this sign I give unto you as the sign of the state. Verily, the will to death, indicateth this sign! Verily, it beckoneth unto the preachers of death!

Many too many are born: for the superfluous ones was the state devised!

See just how it enticeth them to it, the many-too-many! How it swalloweth and cheweth and recheweth them!

"On earth there is nothing greater than I: it is I who am the regulating finger of God"--thus roareth the monster. And not only the long-eared and short-sighted fall upon their knees!

Ah! even in your ears, ye great souls, it whispereth its gloomy lies! Ah! it findeth out the rich hearts which willingly lavish themselves!

Yea, it findeth you out too, ye conquerors of the old God! Weary ye became of the conflict, and now your weariness serveth the new idol!

Heroes and honourable ones, it would fain set up around it, the new idol! Gladly it basketh in the sunshine of good consciences,--the cold monster!

Everything will it give YOU, if YE worship it, the new idol: thus it purchaseth the lustre of your virtue, and the glance of your proud eyes.

It seeketh to allure by means of you, the many-too-many! Yea, a hellish artifice hath here been devised, a death-horse jingling with the trappings of divine honours!

Yea, a dying for many hath here been devised, which glorifieth itself as life: verily, a hearty service unto all preachers of death!

The state, I call it, where all are poison-drinkers, the good and the bad: the state, where all lose themselves, the good and the bad: the state, where the slow suicide of all--is called "life."

[Anonymous No.11017530]

Just see these superfluous ones! They steal the works of the inventors and the treasures of the wise. Culture, they call their theft--and everything becometh sickness and trouble unto them!

Just see these superfluous ones! Sick are they always; they vomit their bile and call it a newspaper. They devour one another, and cannot even digest themselves.

Just see these superfluous ones! Wealth they acquire and become poorer thereby. Power they seek for, and above all, the lever of power, much money--these impotent ones!

See them clamber, these nimble apes! They clamber over one another, and thus scuffle into the mud and the abyss.

Towards the throne they all strive: it is their madness--as if happiness sat on the throne! Ofttimes sitteth filth on the throne.--and ofttimes also the throne on filth.

Madmen they all seem to me, and clambering apes, and too eager. Badly smelleth their idol to me, the cold monster: badly they all smell to me, these idolaters.

My brethren, will ye suffocate in the fumes of their maws and appetites! Better break the windows and jump into the open air!

Do go out of the way of the bad odour! Withdraw from the idolatry of the superfluous!

Do go out of the way of the bad odour! Withdraw from the steam of these human sacrifices!

Open still remaineth the earth for great souls. Empty are still many sites for lone ones and twain ones, around which floateth the odour of tranquil seas.

Open still remaineth a free life for great souls. Verily, he who possesseth little is so much the less possessed: blessed be moderate poverty!

There, where the state ceaseth--there only commenceth the man who is not superfluous: there commenceth the song of the necessary ones, the single and irreplaceable melody.

There, where the state CEASETH--pray look thither, my brethren! Do ye not see it, the rainbow and the bridges of the Superman?--

Thus spake Zarathustra.

[Anonymous No.11017532]

>>11017506
>He doesn't know who Alfred Rosenberg is

>>11017510
Where did I say that? I pointed out how stupid your are for trying to shame reading books on a board who's sole purpose is to...wait for it...talk about books. Figures the guy who doesn't like reading had no reading comprehension, it's pottery.

[Anonymous No.11017560]

>>11017532
>he doesn't understand the Jew

[Anonymous No.11017580]

>>11017560
I don't know what you're trying to say here. If you don't know who Alfred Rosenberg was, I suggest you read up on him. He was executed at Nuremberg for his book, which should tell you all you need to know about that (((postwar order's))) opinion on its contents.

[Anonymous No.11017624]

>>11017580
>He was executed at Nuremberg for his book, which should tell you all you need to know about that (((postwar order's))) opinion on its contents.
Yeah either that or his mass murder as Reichsminister for conquered eastern territories.

I'm starting to think everybody who uses these ((())) is just trolling but then again we have enough /pol/crossposters to know they actually are that retarded.

[Anonymous No.11017645]

Reminder that America was a mistake and there should have been a red-brown alliance

[Anonymous No.11017681]

Mein Kampf

[Anonymous No.11017685]

>>11017624
>Yeah either that or his mass murder as Reichsminister for conquered eastern territories.
Mass-murdering commanding who? The SS? The Wehrmacht? The SA? None of those forces reported to him, he was a civil administrator who had no part in commander any of the military or paramilitary forces that committed crimes. His charges were almost entirely ideological in nature.

[Anonymous No.11017708]

>>11017685
In his function in the Außenpolitischen Amt. He also organized forced labour.
The myth was actually disavowed by Hitler. Rosenberg was laughably unimportant in the third reich.

[Anonymous No.11017719]

no.
they're all shit

[Anonymous No.11017723]

>>11017681
>tfw you will never get to read the works by Adolf Hitler, the philosopher.

[Anonymous No.11017761]

>>11017708
I would argue that his role in the APA really only strengthens what I've said. He was an ideologue more than anything else with no real role in "mass-murder". And I'm aware that Hitler dismissed Rosenberg's book. Hitler was a staunch materialist and Rosenberg was a part of the whole esoteric side of the party with Himmler. That doesn't mean he was uninfluential.

[Anonymous No.11017768]

>>11017230
>Natsoc/Aryan
Just read some classics you fag. Maybe Meditations or something.

Just imagine Leocoon and his sons while reading it and you're good.

[Anonymous No.11017790]

There's more /pol/ shit than usual on here today.

[Anonymous No.11017809]

>>11017790
tbf I think you'd get better book recommendations here than on nu/pol/ for almost any subject

[Anonymous No.11018045]

>>11017530

While I can see how a severe misreading might inspire natsocs, this whole book is ardently against the vast majority of natsoc ideals. Nietzsche, if you read the book, fucking hates the vainglorious, the shepherded, the self-righteous, and is no fan of the state. It’s a work about the individual destroying all bonds, all bounds to tradition and ideas of the future, it’s about rejection of imposition and self-creation thereby.

Nazism is a bad sham. Nietzsche is a genius. Go actually read Nietzsche, and don’t fucking swallow every thought of anyone’s because it supports a conclusion you’re trying to make.

I love this book.

[Anonymous No.11018113]

>>11018045
Hitler has been portrayed to me my entire life as the antichrist of liberal society, I don't understand how you could not see him as the ultimate individual fighting against victim-elevating masses

[Anonymous No.11018706]

>>11017461
HAHAHAHAHAH he fucking puts down Schopenhauer the absolute madman, do you intend on ruining nationalism for these people?

[Anonymous No.11018728]

>>11018706
Schopenhauer is arguably Hitler's largest influence, please refrain from talking about topics on which you are ignorant.

[Anonymous No.11018734]

>>11017461
>The Protocols of the Elders of Zion by Anonymous
This was proven a forgery over a century ago. At least recommend genuine antisemite literature like On the Jews and Their Lies by Martin Luther and other antisemite works of early protestants.

[Anonymous No.11018738]

>>11017233
this, but unironically

[Anonymous No.11018743]

>>11018728
Haha! this is absolutely hilarious, what a complete confirmation of how much of a brainlet Hitler actually was. I am very very well acquainted with both Schopenhauers primary philosophy and his aphorisms, both contradict Hitlers pathetic dogmatism.

[Anonymous No.11018825]

>>11018113
Germans victim-elevated themselves to and displaced their unhappiness into a successful subset of the population to cohere around a man who sublimated his desires which were so erroneous that they fucked over his nation for generations, and that none of his goals were met. He met his downgoing like a coward. He sure abused the shit out of many symbols and past faiths to make a chimeric construct to mislead, but in the end he was no different than many other petty tyrants and cult leaders, excepting the scope of his magnetism and his captive nation’s capacity for production. He did not elevate the race and leave the scene when he was useless. He let hubris and ego push him forward into excess so that he brought down the whole race.

[Anonymous No.11018838]

>>11018743
It is not "national pride" which united the Germans, but commonality of purpose and fate, which does not in any way contradict Schopenhauer.

“Is it blood? Blood is a common possession, but that has not prevented men who spoke one language to have been at loggerheads with each other for centuries. Is it our common economic interests? But that has not prevented the hardest struggles from taking place precisely in this sphere. Is it our history? We know it only too well: a sad tale of war and dissension. Is it religion which is common to us all? No, here too we have fought and disputed with each other … In the same way it is not common customs nor common usages. No, it is something quite different which not merely brings us to this community but even makes it inevitable. It is our common fate, that common fate which none can escape and which is the lot of all life upon this earth.” – Adolf Hitler

“The question of nationality just does not arise any more as in the old days. Rather, there is a singleness of spirit, a commonality in pursuit of the same ideals and goals.” – Arno Breker

“The importance of the individual states in the future will no longer lie in their political or statal power. I look to them rather as important ethnical and cultural centres. But even in this respect time will do its levelling work. Modern travelling facilities shuffle people among one another in such a way that tribal boundaries will fade out and even the cultural picture will gradually become more of a uniform pattern.” – Adolf Hitler

“We have this folk of ours that is not to be defined as a race, and this is now clear to millions. However, when I began my career twenty-five years ago, this was not the case; then I was always told by bourgeois circles: “Yes, folk and race are one and the same.” No, folk and race are not the same! Race is a component of blood – a blood kernel, but a folk is very often composed not of one but of two, three, four or five different blood kernels.” – Adolf Hitler

[Anonymous No.11018844]

I don't know evolva or something
>>11017238
shut your
>>11017310
fucking mouth
Nietzsche was not a nazi, he hated the anti-semites

[Anonymous No.11018894]

>>11018838
This entire pathetic philosophy with its groundings in baseless emotional attachment certainly does contradict Schopenhauer, not that he would have wasted his time writing seriously about anything so trivial as this as he was far more concerned with actual philosophy, more to the point Hitlers party are the national socalists, hence a nationalist party, which does contradict the man. You can post as much rhetoric and old propaganda as you like, but do not namedrop great minds as Hitler did, as there is no greater misunderstanding than that which has occurred to Nietzsche, Kant and Schopenhauer, better yet actually read their real work and remove yourself from this phase before you lose your life.

[Anonymous No.11018940]

>>11018894
>This entire pathetic philosophy with its groundings in baseless emotional attachment
what aspects are grounded in "baseless emotional attachment"? I do not think you comprehend the basis of the National Socialist philosophy and worldview if you think that it is rooted in emotional attachment.
>hence a nationalist party, which does contradict the man
How does being a nationalist contradict Schopenhauer, who was criticizing national pride? Can one not be a nationalist, and as such recognize the benefits of working together with those who speak your language, occupy land which you have access to, and share a common purpose, while not necessarily considering your nation to be superior due to any inherent qualities other than the values which it expresses?

[Anonymous No.11019416]

Why is natsoc and fascism so closely related to esoterism?
Really makes you think

[Anonymous No.11019455]

>>11018825
None of these things are mutually exclusive with the classical conception of heroism that Nietzsche yearned for. The fact that you're parroting the Christian idealization of suicide as cowardly shows that you don't understand what what you're talking about.

[Anonymous No.11019474]

>>11017230
Prob a better idea you just gas yourself

[Sage No.11020462]

>>11019455
Not a Christian. It’s not about the suicide, rather that he didn’t do it sooner. Or perhaps that he never reflected the Nietzschean ideal in the first place. Far as I’m aware, having read the fucking book, they’re incompatible. Unless you take a view of his work so broad as to be meaningless.
The point not being that he wasn’t anti-all else, instead that he was for nothing constructive, and that he dragged nations down with him, and continues to drag plenty of alienated romantics. Because being an ubermensch is not only about the manner of action, the aesthetic, but also about the motive and vector of action.

I see nothing in Hitler that evolved the species outside of the grossest sense, he impacted genetics through the broad erasure of humans in several pools. Perhaps as an enemy he has served good, but that good is mostly made through the eyes and hands of others. His work was short-lived and of poor quality because it was selfish and impossible. Whereas FDR initiated reforms which remade the USA and lasted decades, remade himself when confronted with disaster, reinterpreted the constitution and (not intentionally) left the scene before he could start dragging the US down through the overbearing of his person.

Not plugging an all-American rahrah attitude, the point is where is the lasting of the reforms, the art of the reconstruction, the true evolution of thought. Scapegoating is nothing new, and while national-socialism looked new, it’s a simple reiteration of a one-party rule with a new name and slick optics. It’s reactionary. The reactionary isn’t uber. While they’re an evolutionary force, it isn’t a form of progress that achieved any goals, but instead undermined any purported advancement of mechanism by lack of vision in goals. Naziism is a children’s book. Sure, one may organize small tribes according to its structures, but none of its adherents are capable of organizing anything greater because he philosophy is designed for a village but based on a nation. It is destined to fail.

[Anonymous No.11020473]

>>11017230
>Natsoc/Aryan philosophy
>Esoterism not so much
What are you even asking then?

[Anonymous No.11020476]

>>11017230
Fuck off spook.

[Anonymous No.11020479]

>>11017506
Don't diss my nigga Rosenberg

[Anonymous No.11020488]

Not so much NatSoc but it's good enough

[Anonymous No.11020812]

>>11018844
Never said he was. Nazis did implement a lot of Nietzsche into the Nazi ideology though. This does not mean Nietzsche was at fault.

[Anonymous No.11020912]

>>11018825
There's something to be said about the need for the sacrificial victim. Our society lets all kinds of victims run wild, coddling them and placing them on pedestals by sole virtue of their victim status. Just look at the so called lgbtsjw community, these people, the purple haired snivellers and tranny PoCWoCs they are not happy and will never be happy, their thirst for victimhood is unsatiable. They are driven by a relentless slave morality instinct to debase and destroy, to elevate weakness and diminish the Strong. This is simply not sustainable.

>>11020476
> I'm an edgy nihilist anarcho egoist. It don't you ever dare 'misgender' a tranny or deviate from the NYT cultural Marxism prog consensus!

[Anonymous No.11020969]

>>11017230
>pencil neck
>nazi choker

free trip to camp

[Anonymous No.11020974]

>>11020912
I agree. The germans should have been destroyed after WW1.

[Anonymous No.11021037]

Here I guess
> honestly anytime I see nationalists and white supremacist I feel bad for them. They have nothing else to identify with or to be proud of in their personal life so they pick an ideology that will forever alienate them from everyone outside their groups. They essentially cause their own suffering, and will simply die angry

[Anonymous No.11021084]

>>11018838
>Modern travelling facilities shuffle people among one another in such a way that tribal boundaries will fade out and even the cultural picture will gradually become more of a uniform pattern.
Sounds like what came to pass in the United States in the subsequent decades after WW2.

[Anonymous No.11021086]

>>11020974
>>11020974
I think I adhere to some sort of Nietzschean vitalism. Progressivism is a slave morality bureaucratic ideology that aims at the total regulation, demeaning and eventual annihilation of existence. Everything must be levelled as to not offend the trannies. 'Art' reduced to a technical administrative operation which has as its goal the 'empowerment' of politically correct victim groups. The past is nothing but a bad dream which most be forgotten and systematycally erased so true 'equality' can begin. Heterosexual White Males are like Marx' proletariat in leftist theory, by virtue of their exclusion from the inverted victimhood-hierarchy they alone hold the power and the will to overthrow an order based on cultural Marxism and slave morality.

[Anonymous No.11021091]

>>11021037
>at least when I'm angry I feel something

[Anonymous No.11021588]

>>11021086
okay but this doesn't mean whatever ideology you can make up to replace it is automatically good
it's like in magic the gathering

[Anonymous No.11021659]

>>11017238
Retard detected. Fucking get out.

[Anonymous No.11021987]

>>11021037
>identify with in their own lives
>"identifying" as someone who likes to kayak is the same as having a nationality
most normalfags I know are latently racist anyway so that matter absolutely naught, why would I want to associate with a load of castrated middle class types

[Anonymous No.11023348]

>>11020462
I'm not the guy who's post you originally responded to but I have written at few of the posts in this comment chain. Frankly I don't think he was intentionally trying to exemplify Nietzsche's Overman, but the similarities are certainly there. And then of course if someone was simply trying to be what Nietzsche said and Overman should be then he really wouldn't be much of an Overman.

>FDR was a better example of an ubermensch than Hitler because he wasn't reactionary, overbearing, and he knew when to give up power
Have you even read the source material that you're arguing over? There are so many things wrong with what you're saying here, but I'm going to try. First of all, this entire pile of trash you've written is within a Western worldview of linear, progressive time that's inherent to Christian theology. Nietzsche didn't want you to think of time as linear, to care about "progressing" society; for Nietzsche time is a circle. You do what you do because you'll have to do it all again for all of eternity, the law of eternal recurrence. There is no forwards and backwards and the Ubermensch certainly doesn't do what he does to avoid "dragging down nations".

For Nietzsche the Ubermensch has not yet existed, but he does name several individuals in history who he believes are close. Most of them are artists or writers, but two distinctly political names stick out; Caesar and Napoleon (former in Will to Power latter you can find references in works by Kaufmann and Deleuze). Well what did they do? Caesar destroyed the Republic and got himself killed, Napoleon overthrew the Directory and turned the French Revolution into a twice failed world war of imperial conquest. Neither of them "stepped down", neither of them were not "overbearing", neither of them cared for the "progress" of democracy or the masses. Quite the opposite. And this makes sense if you know anything about Nietszche's political views. In Antichrist he almost explicitly says that an ideal society would be ruled by a rigid caste system similar to that prescribed within Hinduism; philosopher-priests>warrior-kings>masses. To say "X can't be close to the Ubermensch because he was reactionary" isn't only to miss the mark, it's to be in an entirely different ballpark. You seem to have the idea that the Ubermensch is Uber because he bows down to the masses and their slave morality and avoids being "overbearing". The Ubermensch doesn't give a damn what the masses want, he's Uber precisely because he's above and beyond them.
1/2

[Anonymous No.11023356]

>>11020462
>>11023348
You have to understand that Nietzsche was mainly concerned with value-creation. Historically, when someone (like Homer, Jesus, the historical Zarathustra) wanted to shape society with his values, he would do it as a prophet through God(s). "You should do what I say because God told me it was right", and because people believe in God they would do so. But Christianity killed God with its nihilism, so now how do we create morals and values? Value-creators can't just say "God told me X so do X" anymore. Either we enter a faithless world with no values, the world of the Last Man, or someone steps up and says "I say X so do X" and succeeds in commanding the masses. This is the Ubermensch, someone who is so beyond man that he has taken the place of God in their eyes. He is overbearing, he is selfish, he doesn't "step down", and he certainly doesn't care about your system of "progress" or "reaction"; he shapes the world like a piece of marble and defines his era. Was Hitler THE Ubermensch? I don't think so and like I said I wasn't the one who initially claimed that, but he was certainly a higher man, among the closest we've come.
2/2

[Anonymous No.11023362]

>>11017230
>>>/pol/

[Anonymous No.11023382]

>>11017461
Why Jung? What is it in Jung that draws national socialism to it?

[Anonymous No.11023422]

>>11023382
Wotan is an essay specifically on Hitler. A lot of people on the far right gravitate towards Jung because of his religious/neopagan/esoteric sympathies and their connection to Aryanism. Jung himself was fairly active within the Volkisch movement, which honestly has a lot more similarities to what most internet Aryanists believe than the actual Natsoc movement.

[Anonymous No.11024051]

>>11023422
Aryanism, and National Socialism, aren’t “Right wing”.

[Sage No.11024158]

>>11023348

The idea was that there is a kind of morality that Nietzsche portrayed. Remember the bits about “downgoing”? Look, there isn’t any Christlike ubermensch anywhere in that book, there’s no “the one”. What there is is an idea of progress. It’s not definitive. It’s beyond present bounds. Certainly I understood how man is the ass, the lion, the dragon, then the child. But the man has a distinct feeling that there is righ and wrong, though it is beyond good and evil. If you will.

Hitler was a slave who consumed himself. He is not close. Though I grant there are similarities.

[Anonymous No.11024199]

Here are the books on that list that you can find in English and probably in .pdf :

All Carl Schmitt
Life of St Louis, by Joinville
Works by Mussolini, Hitler and Primo de Rivera (you can add Degrelle to that)
Céline's Mea Culpa, Trifles for a Massacre, School for corpses
Bardèche's Nuremberg
add some revisionist stuff you know to that, as long as it's as solid as Reynouard's or Faurrisson's
Try to read a biography of Adrien Arcand, even if you don't find his texts
Saint Thomas Aquinas can be easily found
Koninck's On the Primacy of the Common Good. Against the Personalists
Garrigou-Lagrange's God in 2 volumes
Catechism of Trent or Saint Pius the Xth's one are great
Mgr Lefebvre's They Have Uncrowned Him
Amerio's Iota Unum

Also,try to google translate the articles you can access from this
http://web.archive.org/web/20080918213207/http://www.mouvsaintmichel.org/

[Anonymous No.11024203]

>>11017506
Rosenberg invented positivist Christianity. Berg means mountain in Germanic languages

[Anonymous No.11024211]

>>11017230
Are you just asking for books on National Socialism? Because pretty much all "Aryan philosophy" is necessarily Esoteric, considering there is no real exoteric Aryanist Tradition still in existence.

[Anonymous No.11024212]

>>11024199
Btw avoid Bormann (fake) and apocryphs that make Hitler a Pagan and go read directly his speeches, you'll see the difference.
On Bormann, Skorzeny (La guerre inconnue, pp. 257-258) :
>The very anticlerical Reichsleiter transforms Hitler in an atheist that would have been, on top of that, an anticatholic militant, while NEVER the Führer, raised Catholic, abjured this religion.

[Anonymous No.11024215]

>>11017560
He was against Christianity because it was abrahamic

[Anonymous No.11024222]

>>11017624
You say that but Mein Kampf was banned

[Anonymous No.11024242]

>>11017461
Great list. I just have a few small suggestions.

1) You're assuming a certain amount of knowledge in people. You need to read a lot before you should be tackling Schopenhauer or Nietzsche. Serrano and Devi both have the perennial philosophy as a prerequisite.

2) The Young Hitler I Knew by August Kuzbiek is even better than the table talks. (regardless of if you think the table talks are accurate or not)

3) You need to have some foundational knowledge of National Socialism before tackling this subject. That involves early Fascism all the way up to the NSDAP.

[Anonymous No.11024302]

>>11024215
*Judeochristianity

[Anonymous No.11024310]

>>11021086
>Heterosexual White Males are like Marx' proletariat in leftist theory, by virtue of their exclusion from the inverted victimhood-hierarchy they alone hold the power and the will to overthrow an order based on cultural Marxism and slave morality.

[Anonymous No.11024344]

>>11017493
Oh yeah, why would I go to a music board to make fun of people who listen to hobo johnson or go to a kino board to make fun of Michael bay films?

oh yeah that’s right, just because you share the format it doesn’t mean that things are of the same quality at all

[Anonymous No.11024350]

>>11024310
'Tis true though, the straight white middle class male is the only real revolutionary subject of the postmodern world.

[Anonymous No.11024398]

>>11017230

[Anonymous No.11024417]

>>11024398
this is fake, mon frere

[Anonymous No.11024425]

>>11024344
>Reading primary sources of a political movement is a bad way to learn more about that movement
>Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Jung, Wagner, Spengler are poor quality

[Anonymous No.11024479]

>>11024158
Downgoing is in reference to becoming the Ubermensch and embracing eternal re reoccurrence, it is entirely an individual process and has nothing to do with the "progress" of nations or peoples. It has nothing to do with being a political "reactionary" or "knowing when to quit". The fact that Hitler, and for that matter Caesar and Napoleon, don't align with your Christian slave morality idealization of progress through a linear history is evidence itself that he was a value-creator. And as a value-creator that derived authority for those values from his personal will to power rather than from anything transcendent, he is a higher man in his own right. Hitler was not a slave, a slave believes in pity and guilt. Hitler had no pity for his enemies, he felt no guilt for his actions; he stepped above the slave morality of his time.

[Anonymous No.11024482]

>>11024417
Forgery, or not, it is relevant. What is important is that its contents are true.

[Anonymous No.11025714]

>>11018734
Ye. Proven forgery by a bunch of jews in 1910's and after that never spoken of.

I do suggest that people read it and make their own picture about it. Same as Mein Kampf or the Green Book by Gadhaffi etc... We are still talking about literature. And when its banned, it usually consists of some harsh truth.

[Anonymous No.11026148]

>>11024417
It's proving itself the naked truth since it was revealed to the public.

[Anonymous No.11026376]

>>11017461
>The Myth of the Twentieth Century by Alfred Rosenberg
>Hitler's Table Talks by Adolf Hitler
>Wotan by CG Jung
>The Goebbels Diaries by Joseph Goebbels
excellent recommendations
would you care to come by our town and give a lecture in our town hall? we will decorate it with flags, plants, young maidens and have cookies and coffee for everyone

[Anonymous No.11026383]

>>11018734
>>11024417
>muh forgery
kys (((mason)))

[Anonymous No.11026396]

>>11017310
>Nietzsche
>Nazi
remind me again why he fell out with Wagner?

[Anonymous No.11026409]

>>11017230
I rec The Ramayana and Rumi and Omar Khyyam.