[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 214 KB, 997x792, X9RldUF.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11008218 No.11008218 [Reply] [Original]

>The move from a structuralist account in which capital is understood to structure social relations in relatively homologous ways to a view of hegemony in which power relations are subject to repetition, convergence, and rearticulation brought the question of temporality into the thinking of structure, and marked a shift from a form of Althusserian theory that takes structural totalities as theoretical objects to one in which the insights into the contingent possibility of structure inaugurate a renewed conception of hegemony as bound up with the contingent sites and strategies of the rearticulation of power.
>-Judith Butler
>the left: haha yes
>Jordan Peterson: [some dumb Jungian tragic hero mythology shit]
>the left: umm yikes? obscurantist chud much? i'm SO going to write a thinkpiece on this failson
So, uh, why are we even considering what they're saying anymore? Have you not realized that they're completely opportunistic, and don't care for *anything* except the maintenance of their own power and dominant position in culture? Why even critically engage or defend him? Will @smol_pearl_decolonization on twitter change xher mind because someone attempted to rebut these shitbags' claims?

>t-they're DIFFERENT!!
Drink ethanol loser. I'm so tired of this shit.

>> No.11008230
File: 45 KB, 468x895, nigga what the fuck.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11008230