[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 155 KB, 882x1350, 71wLp685v3L.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11001226 No.11001226 [Reply] [Original]

What are some absolutely essential reads before I tackle this post-Kantian behemoth?

>> No.11001231

Read a wiki on Hegel, and other ish to know what to expect

>> No.11001237

>>11001226
Not much, he is intro tier

>> No.11001255

>>11001226
A philosophy degree

>> No.11001309

>>11001255
kek that would probably make u understand him less because of liberal normie sabotage

>> No.11001331

So, how does he build on Kant?

>> No.11001332
File: 55 KB, 1280x720, slv.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11001332

>>11001309
>Ideology

>> No.11001380

>>11001226
read marx and then hegel, that's how you get hegel right

>> No.11001402

>>11001255
SHILLLLLLLLLL

>> No.11001521

>>11001380
This except don't read marx

>> No.11002644

>>11001331
He takes Kant's "Pure Reason," and makes it one of the first, misguided steps of Hegel's "Reason." He doesn't think there's a phenomenal/noumenal distinction. Basically the only thing he gets from Kant is this idea that our world is a product of consciousness in some way.
>>11001380
kek

>> No.11004515

>>11001226
to read hegel you need to read, with secondary sources

>the greeks, especially Aristotle
>Kant
>the guys necessary to read Kant
>Spinoza
>Fichte
>Schiller