[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 49 KB, 423x599, 423px-Slavoj_Zizek_in_Liverpool_cropped.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1090323 No.1090323 [Reply] [Original]

So, what the hell's wrong with Slavoj Zizek?

>> No.1090327

absolutely nothing.
/thread

>> No.1090331
File: 14 KB, 320x318, zizek.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1090331

Hes a autistic pervert.

>> No.1090335

>>1090331
>autistic
yeah i'm sure you are qualified to diagnose autism and perversity. just come out and say you haven't read a thing by him and GTFO

>> No.1090343
File: 19 KB, 198x247, 200px-Julien_Offray_de_La_Mettrie.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1090343

>>1090335
Looks like somebody is mad. Actually I have read a couple of books by him and seen two of his documentaries(I'm not bragging about watching docs) My opionon of him is not that low, but I do think hes perverted and it does seem like their is something specifically mentally wrong with him.

>> No.1090347
File: 86 KB, 800x532, myfacewhencontinental.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1090347

basically this

>> No.1090349

>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_x0eyNkNpL0

I watched this video of him. Does he always do all those... ticks, for lack of a better word? Or did he just do a bunch of coke?

>> No.1090354

ITT weaklings who have read '' a couple books by him'' (unnamed) or use a macro which makes a little bit of sense but isn't even relevant.
>what's wrong with zizek?
apparently the problem is that noone bothers to read his books before discrediting him. at least on /lit/.

>> No.1090359 [DELETED] 

>>1090347
i really don't get this. what use there for analytic theory without semiotics? can you give an answer for this?

>> No.1090365

>>1090349
He has mild TS

>> No.1090366

>>1090347
okay. without the typo. what use is there for analytic theory without semiotics (or whatever word an analytic would mask his use of semiotics with)? I'm not even talking about more current analytic theorists who are more open to the prospect, but rather the /lit fanboys who seem to think that philosophy is partisan.

>> No.1090368
File: 13 KB, 280x320, 624540.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1090368

>>1090354
Are you him? I didnt know you had enough control over your motor skills to work a computer.

>> No.1090370

>>1090323

he does have interesting ideas if you can excavate them out of his psychoanalytic-marxist verbal diarrhea

>> No.1090372

>that noone bothers to read his books before discrediting him.

When the author himself admits his books are mostly bullshit, it's not really necessary to read his stuff to prove him wrong about it.

>> No.1090377

>>1090372
When a person doesn't get sarcasm, it's not really necessary for them to state their uninformed opinions as fact.

>> No.1090384
File: 51 KB, 460x500, 200705221552_unimpressed.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1090384

>>1090366
>whatever word an analytic would mask his use of semiotics with

>> No.1090391

>>1090384
of course i mean when Analytic School theorists reduce signs to their relation to physical objects (like in the tractatus) It is still semiotics, only it is poor semiotics.

>> No.1090395

No seriously guys, why does he talk like that?

And I don't mean the accent.

>> No.1090399

>>1090395
it's a lisp, not that uncommon. i don't know. i like it.

>> No.1090701

Baudrillard. Debord. Marcuse. Marx. Hegel.


That is all.

>> No.1090733

>>1090349
Definitely coke, cant stop rubbing his nose LOL

>> No.1090745

This board is fucking faggots, everyone in this thread is a faggot

>> No.1090890

>>1090701
forgot lacan

>> No.1090902

“Class is part of the absurdity of narrativity,” says Lacan; however, according to Humphrey[7] , it is not so much class that is part of the absurdity of narrativity, but rather the defining characteristic, and subsequent dialectic, of class. If Lyotardist narrative holds, we have to choose between the cultural paradigm of context and postdeconstructivist theory. It could be said that Lacan uses the term ‘the neocapitalist paradigm of expression’ to denote a self-supporting whole.

Foucault promotes the use of the cultural paradigm of context to attack class divisions. Thus, several discourses concerning modern discourse may be discovered.

Baudrillard suggests the use of the neocapitalist paradigm of expression to modify and read language. It could be said that the characteristic theme of the works of Joyce is the bridge between class and society.

I take it he writes like this?

>> No.1090919

What's wrong with Zizek is that he's not really a Marxist, despite his popular image

>> No.1090937
File: 56 KB, 253x384, analia_hounie_01_display_021.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1090937

HOW CAN THIS SLOBBERING FAUX MARXIST DIPSHIT PULL THIS SHIT?

SERIOUSLY WHAT THE FUCK

>> No.1091200

>>1090919
Defend your opinion. He seems pretty Marxist to me.

>> No.1091220

>>1090733

Dayum that's what i thought at first...