[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 26 KB, 640x548, 10c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10887273 No.10887273 [Reply] [Original]

>had had

>> No.10887291
File: 11 KB, 255x247, sm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10887291

>>10887273
>the The

>> No.10887322

>>10887273
nothing wrong with this grammatically

>> No.10887353
File: 49 KB, 218x218, eef7fb4a78635733fe451acf7078a371.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10887353

>>10887322
>grammatically

>> No.10887356

>edited it

>> No.10887363
File: 67 KB, 686x718, 1521398745405.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10887363

>>10887273
That that had had that that that had had had had that that that had, had that that that had had had that that that had had.

>> No.10887388
File: 84 KB, 1276x620, english,nigger,doyouspeakit.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10887388

>>10887353

>> No.10887411

"..and all the cake could of had had been thrown away."

Nothing wrong with that.

>> No.10887415
File: 11 KB, 640x306, bae.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10887415

>>10887388
I'm not him, but there are a lot of words that shouldn't be used that are in the dictionary.

He probably doesn't like that word for some reason maybe there was a different way to say it that would have pleased him. Don't forget that the laughing emoji is a technical word according to some major dictionaries

>> No.10887430

>>10887415
notice the "informal" in italics--it's what sets slang apart from actual words. I don't understand what is wrong with "grammatically". It's a useful word

>> No.10887443

>cuck cuck

>> No.10887444

>>10887291
Great band, m8

>> No.10887449

>>10887415
are y'all dummies? he means saying "had had" is awful writing regardless of grammar

>> No.10887471

>>10887449
How is 'had had' awful? It's the pluperfect of 'have', literally perfect English.

>> No.10887488

>>10887471
i could give a FUCK about the purpleeffect, find a way to rewrite the sentence if you're about to say "had had". it breaks orwell's 6th rule of writing.

>> No.10887491

>>10887488
Using a perfectly fine tense of a verb does not 'break orwell's 6th rule', you tit.

>> No.10887553

>>10887273
>shouldn't ought

>> No.10887698

>>10887488
On the other hand, it breaks Orwell's 6th rule of writing.

>> No.10887707

>word word

>> No.10887771

Carl Jung says this in the first chapter of Memories, Dreams, Reflections so its acceptable imo..

>> No.10887810
File: 40 KB, 400x400, e6c793f5498de248160d82ab38285eb6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10887810

>>10887273
>semiotics

>> No.10887823

>>10887273
I like your photograph very much. I would like to sniff your anus and see your feet please.

>> No.10888080

>>10887411
>"..and all the cake could of had had been thrown away."
"could of" is incorrect, it is "could have"
so it would be
"..and all the cake could have been thrown away." to make it correct

try:
"...if I had had the keys to the door..."

>> No.10888143

>>10888080
>try:
>"...if I had had the keys to the door..."
Had I the keys to the door...

>> No.10888161

>>10888080
If all the cake I had had had been thrown away

>> No.10888244
File: 218 KB, 291x288, 1520148030148.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10888244

>Had I had known I would have had to have some.

>> No.10888253

had had had had enough of people giving it shit for no reason

>> No.10888290
File: 54 KB, 200x200, Screen-Shot-2015-09-04-at-12.41.51-PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10888290

>adverb

>> No.10888300
File: 415 KB, 1280x640, buffalo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10888300

>Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo

>> No.10888335

>>10888161
>If all the cake I had had had been thrown away
Had someone disposed of all of the cake that I previously had...

>> No.10888340

>>10888244
that just made me come in my pants

>> No.10888356

James, while John had had "had," had had "had had." "Had had" had had a better ring to it, James thought.

>> No.10888522
File: 69 KB, 562x530, 1520552156586.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10888522

I'd have had to have had

>> No.10888834

>that that

>> No.10888871

>>10888300
>Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
my packa fur niggas bout ta cross dis great plain
ma cow love do cocaine
I fuck a hot calf don even know ha name
i can by dat heiffa no weddin ring
ratha go eat some grains

>> No.10889482

>and but so

>> No.10889634

>insane = not sane
>involuntary = not voluntary
>inexpensive = not expensive
>inflammable = VERY FLAMMABLE

???

>> No.10889647

>>10889634
>inflammable = it can be inflamed.
The opposite would be uninflammable

>> No.10889803
File: 2.31 MB, 1933x1450, trump react.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10889803

>>10887411
>could of

>> No.10889816

>>10888871
how long did that take you

>> No.10889823

>not but one

>> No.10889842

>>10889634
>>10889647
right, because to flame is not a verb, although that would be cool
Also, what's the difference between psychologic and psychological? philosophic/philosophical?

>> No.10889849

>>10887488
>I could give a fuck

>> No.10889856

>Adolph Blaine Charles David Earl Frederick Gerald Hubert Irvin John Kenneth Lloyd Martin Nero Oliver Paul Quincy Randolph Sherman Thomas Uncas Victor William Xerxes Yancy Wolfeschlegelsteinhausenbergerdorff, Senior had had pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis in Llanfairpwllgwyngyll.

>> No.10889862
File: 249 KB, 802x576, executed.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10889862

>not unlike