[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 198 KB, 550x535, disappointed.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10886704 No.10886704 [Reply] [Original]

>will to power
>god is dead
>eternal recurrence

Surely a philosopher with such renown as Nietzsche didn't base all his philosophy on feels arguments? It sure seems that way.

>> No.10886718

>>10886704
>Implying god isn’t the biggest muh feels argument
*Preemptively tips fedora*

>> No.10886765

>>10886704
>will to power
organicism, derived from empiricist view, utilized by subjectivist
>god is dead
god is dead
>eternal recurrence
esotericism, would have had to study Heraclitus and the Occult or it won't make sense

>why is Nietzsche based in subjectivity
because he was a subjectivist, perspectivism is subjective, demanding subtle genius is only found in subjectivists

>> No.10886837
File: 48 KB, 827x540, 1519513392610.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10886837

>>10886704
You will know them by their fruits

>> No.10886845

>>10886704
>god is dead is a feels argument
retard it's the probably the only atheist argument that makes any sense

>> No.10886850

>>10886704
>frogposter
>retarded
like clockwork

>> No.10886857

>>10886704
What's wrong with feels?

>> No.10886877

>>10886704
>implying all will is from the self

>implying Gods values are still incorporated in the average persons life

>implying cycles arent endless