[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

File: 48 KB, 213x295, buckley.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

10775635

Anonymous Wed Feb 28 23:29:11 2018 No.10775635 [Reply] [Original]

Is Buckley worth reading or nah?

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 28 23:30:20 2018 No.10775640 >>10775635 Whatever happened to headlines?

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 28 23:33:22 2018 No.10775649 >>10775635 can you not read the headline? Obviously not. The Standard of all Objectivity condemned him

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 28 23:38:39 2018 No.10775667 Buckley was a jewish pet, so no. But the people he purged for his jewish masters like Revilo Oliver are. http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 28 23:42:11 2018 No.10775677 >>10775635 is he the guy who regularly got destroyed by gore vidal, or was that some other buckley?

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 28 23:42:16 2018 No.10775678 His writing is about as informative as his interviews...so, not very.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 28 23:42:24 2018 No.10775679 >>10775635 The only good conservative is a dead conservative.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 28 23:43:28 2018 No.10775682 >>10775677 He failed to control his temper, called Vidal a queer on live TV, and basically nothing else happened.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 28 23:45:50 2018 No.10775688 >>10775635 Useless boomer conservatism and right wing gatekeeper

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 28 23:51:18 2018 No.10775709 >The Objective Standard kali yuga pls

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 28 23:54:54 2018 No.10775720 >>10775635 I like him. He was very charming. I don't care if he wasn't a top tier intellectual. I'm not some nerdy virgin.

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 28 23:55:58 2018 No.10775724 >>10775688 >implying the world doesn’t need gatekeepers

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 1 00:08:34 2018 No.10775758 >>10775635 No, he's objectively cowardly, dishonest, unjust, and racist.

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 1 00:12:27 2018 No.10775773 >>10775677 >anyone >destroyed by gore vidal

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 1 00:22:26 2018 No.10775795 >>10775773 He did manage to embarrass a drunk Norman Mailer.

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 1 01:07:14 2018 No.10775910 >>10775795 Is that the >Once again, words fail Normal Mailer quip I hear every now and then?

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 1 01:42:14 2018 No.10775991 >>10775635 nah, the only people who like buckley are middle aged balding white conservatives who have a hard-on for Edmund Burke (despite having never read a work of him)

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 1 01:50:23 2018 No.10776009 File: 2.90 MB, 3445x2454, ignore.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10775635

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 1 01:55:00 2018 No.10776027 >>10775677 Buckley was in the right. Gore was being a little cunt.

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 1 01:57:34 2018 No.10776033 >>10775677 >buck tries to stay on topic and discuss the issue >gore: 'yeah? well you're a nazi' Whoa, blown the fuck out.

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 1 02:05:29 2018 No.10776060 >>10776009 >Mike Stoklasa >psuedo-intellectual How stupid are you, exactly?

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 1 02:33:47 2018 No.10776150 Yes, he's worth reading. Ignore all the baiting ITT.

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 1 02:39:04 2018 No.10776165 >>10775720 >I like him. He was very charming. are you a woman? that is literally something that a housewife would say.

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 1 03:22:05 2018 No.10776295 >>10775635 >subjective qualifications >t. The Objective Standard

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 1 03:50:45 2018 No.10776361 >>10775635 The fact that he's being called all those names means he was saying something interesting—and probably intelligent too, because if it wasn't intelligent then his detractors would just counter his arguments rather than calling him names.

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 1 04:04:41 2018 No.10776394 >>10775635 I'm convinced.

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 1 04:06:37 2018 No.10776396 Most aesthetic way of speaking English desu

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 1 04:13:54 2018 No.10776415 >>10776009 I swear i saw a version with reviewbrah

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 1 05:25:27 2018 No.10776567 >>10776361 >if it wasn't intelligent then his detractors would just counter his arguments rather than calling him names this notion is completely removed from human behavior