[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 486 KB, 1600x1060, 1282764034814.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1075455 No.1075455 [Reply] [Original]

Sup.
I have recently noticed that I should start reading.
I am a geeky math/sci type, so in the past I have read the stereotypical sci-fi shizz: terry pratchett, robert jordan etc etc.
I enjoy these books, but I feel like there is an extremely large gap in my education regarding more classical literature.

Please recommend all the books you can think of which a person MUST read before he/she can consider themselves cultured.

And yes i am totally doing this just so i can sound smart. derp.

>> No.1075456

The Elegant Universe - Brian Greene

>> No.1075457

Thanks, keep the suggestions rolling.

>> No.1075459
File: 39 KB, 310x390, dostoevsky310.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1075459

You should read some Dostoevsky.

>> No.1075460
File: 847 KB, 1500x3688, classics.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1075460

http://thegreatestbooks.org/

And pic related, though we're not as organised as other boards, like /mu/, with this sort of thing.

>> No.1075462

John Milton: The high poems: Paradise Lost, Samson Agonistes, Paradise Regain'd.
The polemics: Areopagitica.

>> No.1075464

WARNING: A FAMILIARITY WITH GOOD BOOKS RENDERS 90% OF FANTASY LAUGHABLY UNREADABLE.

>> No.1075466

>>1075456

He said literature, not pop-science crap.

I second the Dostoevsky guy. You must read Dostoevsky. You should also get your self reasonably grounded in philosophy.

>> No.1075468

>>1075464
Yeah, you'll basically become a pretentious cunt. One of us.

>> No.1075469

>>1075460
I'm this guy, and I third Dostoevsky.

>> No.1075472

Only read Dostoevsky is you fancy Christian preaching and being able to tell people you read Dostoevsky.

>> No.1075476

Read Faulkner.

Everything Faulkner.

>> No.1075478

>>1075472
>And yes i am totally doing this just so i can sound smart. derp.

That's exactly what OP wants.

>> No.1075481

At minimum... Mostly the classics.
Everyone should be at least vaguely familiar with the Iliad and the Odyssey. The latter is more popular because it's more episodic.
Everyone should know Shakespeare's tragedies, if only to know when bluestockings reference them, eyes rolling back in the ecstasy of being erudite, which is almost as good as being pretty.
Plato's Apology.
You should understand the circumstances of Caesar, Napoleon and Hitler's rises to power, all the biggest names and pithiest quotes involved.
A familiarity with Alexander the Great, the Spartan social system, and Athenian democracy.
Ovid's Metamorphoses. Asides from being a famous piece of literature, it'll fill in the gaps of your knowledge of greek mythology.
Goethe's Faust.
Greek Tragedy (mainly Sophocles, Aeschylus and Euripides)
etc.

>> No.1075480 [DELETED] 
File: 55 KB, 333x500, dragonbone chair.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1075480

hey, so I haven't read that much this summer and I thought I'd read some fantasy. I found this novel laying around in my house and I started reading it, it seems kinda slow but the character and setting are rather interesting.

My question, is this series worth putting my time into? I've noticed that with a lot of fantasy you either love it or you hate it, so I'm curious to see what /lit/ thinks about it.

>> No.1075484

Not OP, but I've been wondering: are Dostoyevsky and Tolstoy actually good? What are their best books? I hear Dostoyevsky is sort of... wordy?

I'm similar to OP in that I'm trying to educate myself a bit. I've read three books (Lolita, Brave New World, Heart of Darkness) from >>1075460 and just ordered 2 more (Wuthering Heights, Picture of Dorian Gray) from bookdepository last week. Currently reading Plato's Republic.

>> No.1075486

The Metamorphosis

>> No.1075491

>>1075484
They're both sort of wordy, although I reckon Dostoevsky's an easier read. You're probably up to it if you're reading the Republic. Also, The Picture of Dorian Grey is fuckwin, both you and OP should get your hands on as much Wilde as possible. I hate Wuthering Heights, but I studied the shit out of it in year twelve, so I figure I just need to give it time and then reread it, maybe I'll see what everyone else is on about.

>> No.1075495

>>1075484
Notes from the Underground is Dosto's least intimidating book at around 100 pages long, although it's hard to get used to the style at first. There's some very good food for thought in there.

If you end up liking The Picture of Dorian Gray, I recommend À Rebours.

>> No.1075504

>>1075491
Thanks for the clarification. I'm not a native speaker, so it took me a while to get used to some of the old language in the Republic, but I'm reading it rather smoothly now.

>>1075495
Thank you for the recommendations.

>> No.1075639

>>1075486

This.