[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 16 KB, 408x301, hullabaloo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10661238 No.10661238 [Reply] [Original]

Can one base his life philosiphy on Mathematical thinking?

>> No.10661242

>>10661238
1+1=no

>> No.10661278

it would be extreamly autistic

>> No.10661364

>>10661238
That would be called utilitarianism with just a pinch of moral banking.

So basically utilitarianism.

>> No.10661370
File: 323 KB, 2474x2064, 1505290752209.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10661370

>>10661238
Yes, secular humanists have been doing it for several centuries

>> No.10661385

>>10661238
Read Confusions of Torless

>> No.10661414

langostinos rancios y timbuktu

>> No.10661449
File: 27 KB, 620x310, py.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10661449

>>10661238
>Life is just numbers lmao

>> No.10661461

>>10661370
wtf is that guy a porn actor? looks like one.

>> No.10661501

>>10661238
Do you know what are mathematical formalism and rigurosity?

>> No.10661512

>t. bertrand russel

>> No.10661958

>>10661461
kinda looks like vin diesel a bit doesn't he

>> No.10662173

>>10661238
Can one base his mathematical thinking on his life philosophy?

>> No.10663522

>>10661238
No.

>> No.10663714

>>10661278
For you

>> No.10663719

>>10661238
Only if you subtract yourself

>> No.10664461
File: 250 KB, 453x382, WHAT THE FUCK DID YOU JUST SAY ABOUT THE ROOT OF 2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10664461

>>10661238

>> No.10664473

>>10661238
Leibnitz and Whitehead sort of tried this i think

>> No.10664479

math is science, not philosophy. its about investigating the human reasoning process with applications to specific tasks. thats literally it.

inb4 buttranged physicist/engineers

>> No.10664515
File: 37 KB, 136x166, 543765764543586.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10664515

>>10661238

yes but only if you identify the One with the Good.

>> No.10666102

>>10661238
You are retarded.

>> No.10666253

>>10666102
you're a stupid dog

>> No.10666267

>>10664479
>math is science
durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

>> No.10666284

>>10661238
Highly unlikely.
What happens when you get to the axiom of choice or Godel statements?

>> No.10666518

>>10661238
What ths guy said >>10666284 You can if you like, but the resultant philosophy will be exceedingly limited.

Mathematics is a model, which is founded on axioms. No model encompasses the universe, and only you can decide what axioms to adopt. You can't live your life entirely by logic, because you will regularly face questions that lie outside your logical system.

>> No.10666704

New Liberals try to quantify happiness, equality and righteousness and have many mathematical instituitions in place to uphold them, materially in the form of welfare, socially in the form of preferential office and employment etc. Qualities such as "disadvantage" are quantified and fed to machines in order to calculate just returns. It's a despicable farce and a sign of terminal disease. The human experience is not a thing to be calculated, mathematics is limited in perception and the sum of this experience ever seems to be greater than its parts

>> No.10666736

>>10661238
No

t. mathematician

>> No.10666743

>>10664479
Yeah just yesterday I empirically checked that square root of - 1 is i

>> No.10667951

>>10661238

Hullabaloo, and howdy doo!
Musty prawns, and Timbucktu!
Yeltsy-by, and hibbety-hoo!
Kick 'em in the dishpan! Hoo hoo hoo!!