[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 1.02 MB, 1000x867, lazy-bear.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10651068 No.10651068 [Reply] [Original]

What's the most interesting idea or insight you've ever read?

>> No.10651109

The idea that quantum entanglement of certain structural molecules in brains is what gives rise to consciousness.

>> No.10651137

>>10651068
In the end, more than in God, it is necessary to believe in yourself

>> No.10651142

>>10651109
it's the other way around

>> No.10651144

>>10651142
idealists leave

>> No.10651151
File: 489 KB, 867x907, IMG_20170811_230813.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10651151

Love thy neighbor

>> No.10651159

>>10651109
That's incredibly fucking dumb and you should feel embarrassed for taking it seriously

>> No.10651171

>>10651159
If consciousness is just an epiphenomenon from brain activity, then it still needs to come from somewhere.

>> No.10651189

>>10651171
And how does it magically occur from nonexistent entanglement any more than standard electrons?
Use your fucking head numbskull

>> No.10651198

>>10651137
And if you believe yourself to be God--bam!, two in one.

>> No.10651202

>>10651189
That's the hard problem of consciousness you faggy troglodyte. Get your 3 inch pianist untangled from your dad's asshair and start thinking with your brain.

>> No.10651220

Virtue is just the extension of aesthetics into the moral plane.

>> No.10651221

>>10651198
That's a banal platitude

>> No.10651264

>>10651202
>the hard problem is solved by science that sounds fancy enough for me to accept as magic

Yeah, no. There's nothing magic in entanglement that isn't in standard bonds. If standard atomic chemistry isn't enough to convince you of the emergence of experience no amount of niggerrigging quantum bullshit is going to either

>> No.10651280

>>10651109>>10651068
>>10651068
>>10651068
>>10651068
>>10651068

oh god i am so fucking embarrassed for you holy shit i don't know what to do, why did you post that you fucking idiot to think that you go around believing that is an abomination of the mind.

>> No.10651283

>>10651280
Ops this was meant for >>10651109
>>10651109
>>10651109
only

>> No.10651294

>>10651280
That Anon is dumb and he should feel dumb

>> No.10651312

>>10651068
I'm struggling with the definition of utility and how to make it into a useful and separate entity from other principles. Thereby enabling the clash between utility and principled arguments.

>>10651294
ikr why do people who know absolutely no fucking physics feel entitled to their own opinion on a hard empirical subject
Physics follows rules, not headcanon

>> No.10651510
File: 345 KB, 407x439, 1515452784826.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10651510

my peanus weanus :DD

>> No.10651524

The only 'bad' thing about the future of humanity is that it'll be different.

>> No.10651531

>>10651068
Clean your room

>> No.10651538
File: 41 KB, 330x499, 51mkpKAtyNL._SX328_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10651538

>>10651151
This but unironically.

Kierkegaard wrote a great book about just this concept.