[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 681 KB, 977x1574, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10589745 No.10589745[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Has Peterson actually attempted any real philosophy?

I’m just going to keep posting Peterson bait threads until we get a seperate /phil/ to quarantine /pol/, or mods actually do something about low effort left/right political arguments.

>> No.10589755

>>10589745
Have you seen that paragraph where he tries to talk about Heidegger. It's pseud gore
Cliff Sergeant is more of a philosopher than Memerson

>> No.10589889

>>10589745
no, he has not. he's a hack.

https://www.viewpointmag.com/2018/01/23/postmodernism-not-take-place-jordan-petersons-12-rules-life/

>> No.10589951

>>10589745
Why do you think /phil/ would separate /pol/? I've read 3 books this year and I'm going to keep coming back every single day, as I have been for months. This is a literature board.

>> No.10589959

>>10589755
Source? I want to laugh

>> No.10589992

>>10589951
I think /phil/ would effectively siphon off most of the left/right culture war posts which is where /pol/ is most annoying. When discussing novels, there’s only so much latitude you get before bait becomes obvious. In philosophical discussions, parroting Peterson’s talking points will consistently be enough to trigger a reply.

>> No.10590037

>>10589755
post it please

>> No.10590045
File: 128 KB, 1024x414, J93LtOr_f22TLkhuj6TbjMc2UR1Y7jf1ByGwPxdxL0g.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10590045

>>10590037
>>10590037
nvm, found it

>> No.10590055

>>10589745
#GotEm

>> No.10590067
File: 156 KB, 400x298, thumb.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10590067

>>10589992
There's already /his/ and Peterson gets spammed there too. What pisses me off is I had my thread removed twice and got banned for trying to start a discussion about the relative merits of this game as a text. Meanwhile the mods allow any number of threads about Pseudo Leaferson.

>> No.10590080

>>10589745
The tollerance of the left.
You're a pseudointellectual chronicaly afraid of every idea different from yours because you're secretly conscious of your complete cultural inadeguacy.

>> No.10590088

>>10589745
isn’t he a psychologist you dum dum?

>> No.10590098

>>10590088
Yes, a psychologist who plays at being a philosopher much like Jung but Jung wasn't a fucking leaf.

>> No.10590124

>>10590067
/his/ is at it’s best when discussing actual history. Every so often they’ll talk about Greek statues or something and actually make sense. I think history and literature majors really shouldn’t be discussing philosophy. So far /lit/ works since people who post on 4chan will be more widely read than your average lit major. However, philosophy is like honey for /pol/ style pseuds.

Anyway, I’m open to chat about Getting Over It. I think it falls into a category distinct from most existing games, in that the narration actually responds to mechanics so it’s not a walking sim and the mechanics react to changes in the narrative. The closest I think we’ve seen to this is Thomas Was Alone or Oxenfree.
I certainly think this style will be what actually makes games acceptable as an artform, since it actually gains something unique from the interactivity.

>> No.10590145

Yes of course!
>Clean your asshole
Brilliant.

>> No.10590148

>>10589745
The only way to keep /pol/ and /leftypol/ retardation out of the board is to rangeban north america.

>> No.10590165

>>10590124
Well what I was impressed with was even though it was clearly going to be youtuber bait from the start the presentation, especially the narration managed to actually use the frustrating difficulty and absurd absence of anything rewarding aesthetically (lazy design?) into something somewhat edifying. If a rage game has a snake near the very end that takes you back to the start that seems like the ultimate dick-move but when Foddy describes its purpose is to lengthen the struggle of the game because defeating the game will be a disappointment it almost seems like the snake really should be there. So I was impressed with the synergy of the actual gameplay elements and the message being communicated. Most games that have the pretense of being artistic are just vehicles for stories that could easily be captured in film or writing. He took something that definitely was not ludo and by giving players a certain way of looking at it he managed to make it ludo.

Also its hilarious that this game with about 10 minutes of content seems to summarize Peterson's entire philosophy of personal development

>> No.10590170

>>10590088
Tell that to him

>> No.10590175

>>10589889

This article is marred with misrepresentations and ad hominems. Seems like that's the only thing JP gets lately.

>> No.10590180

>>10590170
ouch

>> No.10590197

>>10590045
I dont think Peterson is that great either, but this passage about Being isnt horrendous in any sense

Im going to assume you find a problem with Peterson putting objective reality alongside Being. In the introduction to Being and Time Heidegger says the same thing. Phenomenology is not at war with the sciences, at least for Heidegger. He simply wants to make a case that western metaphysics has forgotten the question of what is Being, and has only focused on this or that aspect of objective reality.

>> No.10590208

>>10590197
The embarrassment is he clearly has no idea WHY Heidegger would make such a claim as such only bringing him up just to make the mere statement that we exist is the definition of pseudo-intellectual

>> No.10590217

>>10590208
>he clearly has no idea WHY Heidegger would make such a claim as such
> [And instead] only bringing him up just to make the mere statement that we exist

I think thats what youre saying

Well what youre asserting isnt at all clear from the pic you posted, that has to deal with how he actually uses Being rather than how he describes it in this footnote.

>> No.10590405

>>10590165
The world records are at 3 minutes, so it’s got less than 10mins if content if you think about it.

>> No.10590498
File: 60 KB, 991x902, 21582.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10590498

>>10590080
>accuses an anon of pseudointellectuality
>proceedes to use "inadeguacy" in his contrived shitpost

>> No.10590505
File: 303 KB, 1900x914, Screen Shot 2018-01-26 at 6.27.45 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10590505

umm, do YOU have the number 4 most selling book on Amazon rn???

>> No.10590508
File: 51 KB, 419x249, jjjjj.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10590508

>>10590498
>imblying ids nod inadeguade

>> No.10590515

>>10590508
keked

>> No.10590531

>>10590505
People who can't think write in platitudes and cliche sayings ('a beacon of light'.'the individual, the smallest unit of society', etc.), just like that reviewer

>> No.10590536
File: 7 KB, 224x225, 1463080405887.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10590536

>>10590505
It's #1 now.

>> No.10590537
File: 37 KB, 408x388, Screen Shot 2018-01-25 at 4.54.08 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10590537

>>10590531
sweetie...

>> No.10590540

>>10590537
>people are dumb

who woulda thunk it?

>> No.10590541
File: 41 KB, 446x402, Screen Shot 2018-01-26 at 6.36.54 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10590541

>>10590537
Gravity's Rainbow, to compare

Peterson is a literal apostle of men

>> No.10590558

>>10590505
But Rupi Kaur had the #1.

>>10590537
>>10590541
What if the book’s been out for like a week, and nobody leaving a review read it without being very motivated to give everything they could to Kermit.

>> No.10590562

>>10590558
>>10590536
Easily meme'd.

>> No.10590573

>>10590536
Admit it, the main reason you hate Memerson is because he is popular and you happen to disagree with him.