[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 357 KB, 550x330, gdgagagagada.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10547494 No.10547494 [Reply] [Original]

Is the moderate position always the best position?

>> No.10547500

>>10547494
Why would it be?

>> No.10547512

>>10547494
Moderation is just how dumb people hedge their bets

>> No.10547873

Not always.

>> No.10547886

>>10547512
this

>> No.10547919

>>10547494
not under extreme circumstances, thats just asking for people to completely undermine you
it is the safest tho

>> No.10547933

No.
Political moderates are the absolute worst.

>> No.10547938

>>10547494
Sometimes but not always. Saying it is always wouldn't be moderate.

>> No.10547940

Usually

>> No.10547984

>>10547494
I dunno man. Throwing out "always" is pretty extreme

>> No.10549615

>>10547494
No

>> No.10549617

>>10547494
If you have no convictions I imagine it would be.

>> No.10549625

report non-literature threads
https://sys.4chan.org/lit/imgboard.php?mode=report&no=10547494

>> No.10549632
File: 50 KB, 540x425, centrist.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10549632

No. If you're not sure whether to get chemo therapy the answer is not to get a little. A lot of problems require full commitment once you acknowledge them.

It's like these cunts who pay lip service to climate change and green politics but think getting a Prius and separating their plastic garbage is enough of a contribution to fixing the problem and scoff at the deniers but also scoff at people actually committed to solving the problem.

Moderate is generally just a euphemism for lacking conviction and being a passive cunt. Moderates should be lined up and shot desu.

>> No.10549637

>Drinking bleach is beneficial

>Drinking bleach is not beneficial

>Drinking bleach is a little bit beneficial

>> No.10549714

Depends on what is considered moderate in your country.

>> No.10549720
File: 37 KB, 329x499, aristotle.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10549720

>>10547494
Yes

>> No.10549734

>>10549720
I clicked this thread because I knew some faggot would be in here misunderstanding Aristotle.

>> No.10549736

>>10549734
kek

>> No.10549798

>>10547494
No. This statement itself for example is not moderate at all.
However I do consider myself a moderate, and I identify nicely in the "In medio stat virtus" principle.

>> No.10549802

>>10549632
Cherrypicking and strawmen arguments are really the corruption of modern debates.
This is not how an actual "centrist" thinks.

>> No.10549808

>>10549632
a centrist isnt a moderate

>> No.10549820

That approach wouldn't work for a variety of situations. One side could always move more and more extreme to make their goals seem like the center. Example:
Person one: all abortion is bad. No one should be aborted.
Person two: all abortion is good. Everyone should be aborted.
Centrist: both sides make good points. All women should be aborted. Yay, I resolved conflict.

That's a dumb example, but if someone decides to be in the middle, them the debaters just need to change the goal posts of the argument. Taking the "center" is only slightly better than being uninformed, because the center is completely subject to change

>> No.10549831
File: 22 KB, 480x360, dolf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10549831

>>10549808
true, there are also Radical Centrists

>> No.10549854

>>10549632
>>10549637
>>10549820
Why does everyone seem to confuse "moderatism" with centrism, and using the middle ground fallacy to state their arguments? That's just superficial.

Being moderate doesn't mean to always marry the opinion in the exact middle. For example, I can value the importance of free market in a healthy economic system, without dismissing the role of a good welfare and its social institutions. That's a moderate position.

>> No.10549891
File: 56 KB, 645x773, brainlet+1491287171858.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10549891

>>10549854
Can I get one good welfare please

>> No.10549902

>>10549632
Such an embarrassing post, and you sound so sure of yourself too

>> No.10549907

>>10549891
No

>> No.10549912
File: 127 KB, 499x499, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10549912

>>10547494
a moderate wouldn't be able to answer this question

>> No.10549989

>>10549854
what you just described is economic centrism

>> No.10550174

If you can't see the pros and cons of both sides of a debate you are a retard.
If after weighing the pros and cons you can't choose a side, you are weak.

If you are dumb and weak you stay out of the argument.
If you are dumb and strong you become an extremist.
If you are smart and weak you are a moderate/centrist.
If you are smart and strong you can wisely defend your side of the argument without being an extremist and can teleologically suspend the arguments for the other side (against your side) in order to reach your desired goal.

>> No.10550185

>>10547512
or for people that understand that things have nuance

>> No.10550200

>>10547494

No. The best range of positions is a binary range of positions including extreme conservativism and extreme liberalism, played in a tight aggressive style in accordance with game theory optimal strategy. It should be highly dependent on position, and betting should consist of pot sized bets which force the opposing player to play against your entire range for that street instead of being able to narrow it down.

>> No.10550246

>>10547494
it's the easiest, not the best

>> No.10550759

no, it's usually the worst.

>> No.10550760

>>10547494
Communist is always the best position.

>> No.10550763

>>10547494
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JB_omHQwYh8

>> No.10550765

>>10550760
Oh shit I thought this was /pol/ nevermind.

>> No.10550773

>>10547494
Yes.
/lit/ is a /Macron/ board.

>> No.10550982

"Moderation is for cowards. Any thing worth doing is worth overdoing."

>> No.10551206
File: 228 KB, 1769x1556, 3199E68E-5396-43A5-8C59-AA471EDF16C2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10551206

>> No.10551222

>>10549637
Wouldn’t the correct response be

>I’m not sure whether bleach is good or bad, so I won’t drink any until I am sure

>> No.10551237

Wrong, it is always the worst.

>> No.10551264

>>10550982
The secret is to moderately be a moderate.

>> No.10552055

>>10547512
extremism is how dumb people exuberant confidence and understanding when faced with the endless uncertainties of life

>> No.10552072

>>10550174
This

>> No.10553203
File: 134 KB, 1200x848, __remilia_scarlet_touhou_drawn_by_fkey__07cb18fa7449020ff60cd6d3a18d2bb0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10553203

>>10547494
Maybe, but the best one there is actually being knowledgeable to both positions (or all 4 if you post Political Compass).
>Not shitposting on both Tumblr and /pol/ for shits, giggles and (you)s

>> No.10553277

>>10552055
Why did you skip past making a true statement, and settle for an only moderately true statement?

>> No.10553282

>>10553277
Could it be.. because of..
moderation?

>> No.10553421

>>10553277
notice I didn't say the negatives of extremism outway the positives. A smart capable man would use extremism to further his goal because of his knowledge of history and observations of his surroundings. A smart man truly believing his extremist views are always the best course or action are rare and always destructive. For the 99% of any extremists, I stand by my statement

>> No.10554008

This thread was moved to >>>/pol/157127089