[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 27 KB, 335x400, aleister-crowley.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1050932 No.1050932 [Reply] [Original]

https://www.testmybrain.org/consent_all.php?exp=61

Hello c/lit/s.

The above test will measure your ability in holistic thinking. I already gave the same test to /sci/ and much to my surprise they seemed to excel in it(I assumed they would be more dependent on analytical thinking)

>>>/sci/1612917
^the original thread if you want to see it.

>> No.1050939
File: 37 KB, 579x429, numbars.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1050939

I already posted in that thread and this was me

>> No.1050991
File: 71 KB, 672x397, woo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1050991

Here's mine. I kept having technical difficulties though.

>> No.1051006

That's because /sci/ is science and science fiction fans (and religion trolls), not scientists.

>> No.1051045

I made it to part 3 then got got bored with the test.

>> No.1051068
File: 16 KB, 529x434, ryjfghsrth.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1051068

Had some lag resulting in me not seeing a handful of slides.

>> No.1051071
File: 39 KB, 628x402, numbersense.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1051071

Key thing to note is that the distribution is almost entirely north of 85% right.

>> No.1051074

So far /lit/ is about as accurate as /sci/ but not nearly as quick.

>> No.1051076 [DELETED] 

>>1051071
Jesus fuck man,
are you even human?

>> No.1051081

>>1050932

94% and good thing my lizard brain is good at math because I pretty much stopped paying attention and was daydreaming. Which, I guess, is the point of this study.

>> No.1051093
File: 4 KB, 300x57, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1051093

92, but 5 times I KNOW it was blue and I accidentally hit yellow.

More importantly, DAT FUCKING CAPTCHA

>> No.1051115
File: 37 KB, 592x425, awyeah.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1051115

My eyes hurt now though.

>> No.1051125
File: 20 KB, 558x414, Approx No Sense.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1051125

>>1051093
I, too, had confidence problems. I knew it was yellow and hit blue, or vice-versa. But only 'cuz I knew I'd be "graded" on speed.

>> No.1051137
File: 16 KB, 520x424, results.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1051137

I'm beginning to think that there are no average people who took this test.

>> No.1051145

>>1051137
I think people on 4chan are all slightly above average, especially those on /sci/ and /lit/. Also keep in mind that the average probably includes older people who arent as mentally sharp.

https://www.testmybrain.org/index.html
Here are some of the other tests that you can take.

>> No.1051158
File: 39 KB, 632x462, numbrrrs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1051158

I had no idea that speed was a factor, I just wanted to get the test over with.

>> No.1051188
File: 17 KB, 571x301, test.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1051188

AWWWWWWW YEAAAHHHHH

>> No.1051229
File: 18 KB, 603x443, Test My Brain_1282094607178.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1051229

>> No.1051240

>>1051093
Maybe you were supposed to type in "A A A?"

>> No.1051238

95%

I think I hit the wrong button once or twice.

>> No.1051259
File: 77 KB, 623x436, Picture 1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1051259

hah, i beat everyone in this thread and the /sci/ thread. pretty good for a liberal-arts educated cumdumpster.

(although to be fair, i'm an artist and designer... so that might have something to do with it.)

>> No.1051269

sure is /b/ in here...

>> No.1051287
File: 36 KB, 546x453, math.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1051287

I'm pretty horrible at math

answered too fast, made some mistakes

>> No.1051293

You had a score of 94% correct on this test. Based on the results we have so far, the average person who takes this test scores 90% correct.

Your percentile score on this test was 70, meaning you scored higher than 70% of people who took this test

It took you an average of 0.56 seconds to respond to each item. The average person who takes this test takes an average of 1 seconds to respond to each item. This means you respond to each item a little faster than the average person who takes this test.

I had a little issue with the slides not showing the first time round, waited around too long, but they appeared the second time round.

>> No.1051297

>>1051287

I'm not so sure if being bad at math has anything to do with it. I'm pretty terrible at math, and I'm >>1051158

>> No.1051329

I got less than average. I don't give a fuck.

You had a score of 89% correct on this test. Based on the results we have so far, the average person who takes this test scores 90% correct.

Your percentile score on this test was 48, meaning you scored higher than 48% of people who took this test

It took you an average of 0.57 seconds to respond to each item. The average person who takes this test takes an average of 1 seconds to respond to each item. This means you respond to each item a little faster than the average person who takes this test.

>> No.1051331

96%

I pressed the wrong button three times that I know of.
English is not my first language, it's hard to make the instant connection between the letter and the colour.

>> No.1051336

>>1051240
That's F-sharp, bro.

>> No.1051344

I got 85% @ .35 seconds average which puts me at the 29th percentile. I messed up a number of times but even with my apparently poor number sense, I know that it wouldn't have caused that great a departure from the average. Thankfully, I seem to do pretty well at math (even mental calculation) anyway.

>> No.1051350

>You had a score of 94% correct on this test. Based on the results we have so far, the average person who takes this test scores 90% correct.

>It took you an average of 0.25 seconds to respond to each item. The average person who takes this test takes an average of 1 seconds to respond to each item. This means you respond to each item a little faster than the average person who takes this test.

Dumb test to be honest. Give it to someone with bad typing skills and/or bad reactions and he is toast.

>> No.1051360

Apparently I can't remember a sequence of numbers bigger than 5.

>> No.1051365

>>1051350

ps. Its also a bad example on how you are in mathematics, I almost failed at mathematics in HS.

>> No.1051373

92%

.18 seconds.

fast and loose, baby

>> No.1051384
File: 237 KB, 400x326, 1264997859437.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1051384

>>1051365
Are you implying that your grades in school are an accurate representation of you actual intellectual abilities?

>> No.1051389

93% correct, average response time of .38s

>> No.1051395

>>1051365
How does this test have anything to do with math? You look dots and press a button.

>> No.1051393

Too lazy to screen cap. 93% and .39 seconds average on each one. I wanted to get through it quickly. I know I got at least two wrong because I was going so fast that I hit the wrong answer.

>> No.1051408

i browse both /sci/ and /lit/, but more /lit/. Got 91%, and a 0.4 reaction time. I was in a dim room with extreme nausea (thank you medications) and blurry vision though, but still I'd place myself at average regardless, which thankfully was what I got.

>> No.1051411
File: 66 KB, 543x410, tests.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1051411

I'm ashamed, i kept fucking up where I'd hit the wrong button and immediately realize i was wrong

>> No.1051418
File: 195 KB, 1263x1646, test.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1051418

I was bad at math.

>> No.1051419

>>1050932
What happened to that book club Courage?

>> No.1051423

>>1051418
nigga you slow

>> No.1051426

>>1051395
some people with genius math skills could probably immediately know the exact amount of dots for each color.

>> No.1051439

>>1051259
Can I have my babies with you so my future offspring won't be terribly average at math? You can just drop them off at my house and no one will ever know.

>> No.1051456

>>1051419
I goes well.
All good things shall come with time...

>> No.1051471
File: 38 KB, 625x468, Untitled.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1051471

>> No.1051485

idiots

>> No.1051500

>>1051485
NO U

>> No.1051524

94% correct. percentile score 70. average of 0.5 seconds to respond.

>> No.1051532

You had a score of 90% correct on this test. Based on the results we have so far, the average person who takes this test scores 90% correct.

Your percentile score on this test was 50, meaning you scored higher than 50% of people who took this test

It took you an average of 0.44 seconds to respond to each item. The average person who takes this test takes an average of 1 seconds to respond to each item. This means you respond to each item a little faster than the average person who takes this test.


...so I'm a TINY bit different than the average person? Well isn't that a confidence booster.

>> No.1051575

>93%
>65%
>.55 seconds
Too lazy to screencap

>> No.1051614

Average score, faster response. After 7 drinks. w/e

>> No.1051643

I have a Ph.D. in mathematics and I scored in the 43rd percentile. If I didn't understand statistics I'd be depressed by this.

>> No.1051658

>>1051643
300k startin any job u want?

>> No.1051665

I did really bad. Haha. I would think "Yellow" and hit 'B.'

>> No.1051691

88%
.58 seconds average.

im horribad at math and pressed the wrong button a few times

>> No.1051694

>>1051643

no you don't, stop trying to look cool on the internet, nobody is impressed. if you're really a phd you have better things to do than 4chan.

>> No.1051774

I felt pretty bad about scoring a 83% until I saw that all the rest of you guys were scoring below average to. There is really no point in taking this thing all it does is measure how well you cognitively recognize quantity when it is flashed before your eyes. I really don't see how it measures your intelligence. This is like a test for Rain-Man like people.

>> No.1051780

94% correct in a 0.43 average time per question. this is the result after ive smoken weed.

my original score was 89% with a .59 average.

go figure !

>> No.1052767

>>1051774
No one ever said it was a measure in intelligence.

>> No.1052768

>>1051780

>>I DID BETTER THE SECOND TIME I TOOK IT U GAIS

>> No.1052780

me

You had a score of 91% correct on this test. Based on the results we have so far, the average person who takes this test scores 90% correct.

Your percentile score on this test was 52, meaning you scored higher than 52% of people who took this test

It took you an average of 0.5 seconds to respond to each item. The average person who takes this test takes an average of 1 seconds to respond to each item. This means you respond to each item a little faster than the average person who takes this test.

>> No.1052784

wow. everybody is above average. average doesn't seem so average right now.

>> No.1052799

What the hell, I took it 3 times, first time I got a 93, second I got an 88, and third I got an 85??!?!

Though I haven't eaten for a day since I took the seoncd test, could it be that reason?

>> No.1052815
File: 87 KB, 384x438, lolz.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1052815

>>1052784
>average doesn't seem so average right now.
>4chan

also, my score is only 85%

>> No.1052818

i'm average

>> No.1052829

>>1051774
Actually most of us scored above average? And it's a measure of your ability to quickly approximate relative numbers, so yes, it has *something* to do with intelligence.
This isn't a test for "Rain-Man" like people, this is a test that normal people on the internet were taking, and you did worse than half of them. Sorry.

>> No.1052836
File: 36 KB, 555x423, ANS.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1052836

And I don't have some excuse about technical difficulties or accidentally hitting wrong buttons to justify my score.

>> No.1052843

You had a score of 89% correct on this test. Based on the results we have so far, the average person who takes this test scores 90% correct.

Your percentile score on this test was 48, meaning you scored higher than 48% of people who took this test

It took you an average of 0.6 seconds to respond to each item. The average person who takes this test takes an average of 1 seconds to respond to each item. This means you respond to each item a little faster than the average person who takes this test.

>> No.1052844

>>1051643
Tell me, what exactly does statistics say about a supposed PhD in math scoring worse than 57% of people who took a totally open to the public, math-based test? I'd be interested to hear.

>> No.1052849

>>1052844
Its not really math based in the same way that most math is. The whole point of the test is to measure your intuitive perception of numbers, most of mathematics is logical.

According to the study that went with the test people who did really good arent always good at math, but people who did bad(like bottom 10%) were universally bad at math.