[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 209 KB, 1200x1200, 5342534253453.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10459856 No.10459856 [Reply] [Original]

Please tell me what contributions he made have ANY merit today whatsoever. His view about sense data is peasant-tier; everything stems from experience, including your conception of space and time.

>> No.10459869

>hasn't even read Leibniz

[-]

>> No.10459873
File: 202 KB, 406x436, 1454689906049.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10459873

>everything stems from experience, including your conception of space and time.

YOU FUCKING RETARD EVEN THE MOST PRIMITIVE TABULA RASIST STILL BELIEVED IN A SENSUS COMMUNIS OR PASSIVE CONSTITUTING FUNCTION OF THE INTELLECT HOW CAN YOU POSSIBLY SAY SOMETHING SO RETARDED AFTER HEGEL AND HEIDEGGER IF ANYTHING KANT WASN'T RADICAL ENOUGH EVERY SINGLE FUCKING ANALYTIC AND PRAGMATIST AGREES WITH HIM YOU STUPID FUCKING RETARDED CUNT YOU ARE LARPING THAT YOU'RE MORE LOCKEAN AND HUMEAN THAN LOCKE AND HUME AND NO ONE SHOUDL REPLY TO THIS THREAD

IF THIS PIECE OF GARBAGE THREAD GETS A BUNCH OF PSEUD FAGGOTS ARGUING ABOUT THIS NON-ISSUE I'LL FUCKING KILL MYSELF

>> No.10459874

>>10459869
What? Leibniz is great, at least in terms of mathematics/logic.

>> No.10459875

>>10459856
>including your conception of space and time.

If you actually read him instead of making a stupid person thread you'd know he doesn't actually disagree with you here. Kant never proposed that Space and Time were innate knowledge only that are minds are composed in such a way to fundamentally sense reality in terms of space and time which is a very separate matter.

>> No.10459885

>>10459875
If that's true why the fuck does he advocate for synthetic judgements made a priori?

>> No.10459903

>>10459885
Kant very specifically denies any possible objective validity to synthetic a priori judgements at the end of the Transcendental of Principles

>> No.10459998

>>10459856
>everything stems from experience, including your conception of space and time
Why would you think this, much less write it on a public forum for everyone to see?

>> No.10460017

>>10459873
This plus you never find a code of consequences or a code of virtues, so all applied ethics is deontology, and all books on aesthetics after him are footnotes to the third Critique. Kant isn't just a big guy for you, he's the biggest since Aristotle.