/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.10444490]

Prove me you have an in-depth knowledge of these philosophers' thought

[Anonymous No.10444501]

>>10444490
>Prove me
Go fuck yourself. And have a Merry Christmas too.

[Anonymous No.10444502]

I'd be ashamed to have an in-depth knowledge of their work.

[Anonymous No.10444521]

I know enough to shitpost about them. Any more knowledge would be a waste of space.

[Anonymous No.10444601]

>>10444490
>Deleuze
Wrote a book with capitalism in the subtitle, so he's probably against it. I live in a capitalist country, and am very aware of the gulag, so no thanks commie fuck. From what I've heard online, his writing is unreadable which is probably correct.

>Derrida
Made deconstructionsim, which shifts focus away from the author's message to what is not his message in order to infer questions about the author and their writing. + It's only the difference between letters that makes language work at all, therefore no account can be more truthful/superior/authoritative than any other or something like that.

>Foucault
Said the grand narratives of any age are the means by which the elite culturally control the masses or something. Knowledge/Power something. Wrote a three volume work on sexuality. Was a faggot. Died of aids.

[Anonymous No.10444636]

>>10444490
>deleuze
loved brandy but also sherry, saw brandy during the week and sherry on weekends

>derrida
actually considered himself a radical birdwatcher, not a Filosopher with a capital F. didn't give up his catholic faith even while in hospital after taking a woodpecker to the eye, which proved to be fatal

>Foo Co.
founder of Grindr, bred cats with his co-author Bow Dree-ard

[Anonymous No.10444678]

>>10444502
Afraid you might like it, big boy?

[Anonymous No.10444687]

>>10444636
underrated

[Anonymous No.10444781]

>>10444501
Why so mad, pleb?