/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.10411572]

>mfw unironically writing the most important philosophical manifesto of the 21st century

how do I make sure it gets published even if I die by accident?

[Anonymous No.10411576]

>>10411572
Tell us about it.

[Anonymous No.10411590]

>>10411576
read it for youself lad
we need some /lit/ critiquing on this thread
http://boards.4chan.org/r9k/thread/41839567#bottom

[Anonymous No.10411602]

>>10411590
>r9k

[Anonymous No.10411614]

>>10411602
it's worth a read anon

[Anonymous No.10411618]

an excerpt from Part II / Chapter 4:

>"It is therefore clear that masochism and its associated psychological corollaries (self-loathing, submissiveness) are in fact evolutionary advantageous traits in the female gender. As I have demonstrated, the very act of inter-personal penetration is an intensely and necessarily humiliating for the penetratee. In order to encourage reproduction and thus the survival and indeed proliferation of the Will, the human female is thus genetically inflicted with the self-loathing mechanism which compels her to act in a submissive and self-destructive manner, if only for the sake of finding the notion of being penetrated by a man (or, indeed, by several man simultaneously) not only necessary but desirable."

This is from a rather political section which explains why the degree of socio-political power possessed by women is equal to the rate at which a society declines into degeneracy and weakness.

[Anonymous No.10411622]

OP again. This is the introductory poem to the book. It's kind of rough but I'm still proud of it:

Many of you say,
'Oh, but I am not blind. I have never been blind'
But when you truly see you will understand
Just how truly blind you once were
To even think it right to say were not blind.
What does a blind man see?
Blackness, darkness, blankness,
Black darkness, dark blankness,
The absence of things.
Quite literally
No thing, no things,
Nothing, nothings.
So, you see nothing,
You've been blind, do you understand this?
You can't fully immerse yourself.
You don't have the light.
You don't have the radiance,
The radical light,
The radically radiant light of truth
And truth's belonging love
And nature of light
And loving truthful radiance.
And I bring you into the light...

[Anonymous No.10411633]

>>10411572
dumb frogposter

[Anonymous No.10411636]

>>10411622
This is more or less LOL REDPILLS the poem.

>>10411618
>(or, indeed, by several man simultaneously)

Why was this necessary?

You write like a /pol/tard with a strong vocabulary.

[Anonymous No.10411642]

>>10411618
If you seriously attempt to get this published, your death will not be an accident, but rather the act of a benevolent God.

[Anonymous No.10411646]

>>10411614
Did you mother happen to abuse you as a child? Did girls bully you growing up?

Because what you are saying leans extremely in that direction.

[Anonymous No.10411657]

>>10411618
if any of this was true why the fuck would feminism be a thing... furthermore, you're completely ignoring that women have all the power in sexual relationships because they decide consent, and by extension disproportionate social power in general.

[Anonymous No.10411660]

>>10411572
You're a funny dude.
Publish this as satire.
And I'll publish my work on das Uber Riche in Spanish to the Mexican people.
It'll be a way to encourage the union national synarchistia back into action.

[Anonymous No.10411664]

Writes a philosophical manifesto about women without ever speaking to or getting with a woman.

Utterly pathetic.

[Anonymous No.10411674]

>>10411618
big words but
>not an argument

[Anonymous No.10411677]

>>10411618
t. the Supreme Gentleman

[Anonymous No.10411681]

>>10411664
Why would anyone want to speak to a woman?

[Anonymous No.10411687]

>>10411681
I do, on several occasions.
Sometimes just for fun.

[Anonymous No.10411688]

women are objectively inferior to men

[Anonymous No.10411689]

>>10411622

[Anonymous No.10411691]

>>10411657
The jews have brainwashed women to go against their genetic submissiveness, of course. What did you think

[Anonymous No.10411693]

lol this has been posted before (or if it hasn't then goddam that's sad that you even thought this could possibly be original as a bullshit meandering justification for misogyny).

[Anonymous No.10411695]

>>10411618
oh wait, you're serious. how cute.

[Anonymous No.10411698]

>>10411618
its not entirely offbase, but its not all that interesting, you also stole other people’s ideas blatantly.

[Anonymous No.10411703]

>>10411618
Hey OP. I think there's some merit to this idea, but unfortunately there are examples in nature of species in which the female is penetrated and must submit to the male, but also the female is not submissive to the male in general.

The example is the praying mantis. The male mantis mounts the female mantis from behind and deposits sperm into a particular part of the female. Then about 17% of the time, the female eats the male. However, because multiple matings occur, most adult males end up being eaten. So the act of penetration does not make self-hatred/masochism a "winning" sexual strategy, and in fact it is possible for the penetrator to be the "submissive" gender.

I do think many women engage in somewhat masochistic behavior, but I don't think it comes from this particular reason alone.

[Anonymous No.10411706]

>>10411572
This must be Houellebecq drumming up some business for his new book.

[Anonymous No.10411711]

>>10411618
there are two possibilities here
>le epik trole
>sincere
if you wrote this sincerely, there's no hope for you anon, you will die either by suicide or by police gunfire following your elliot rodger copycat shooting, that is if you can ever get out of the group home for severely autistic children that you currently live in
why do the staff let you have an internet connection?

[Anonymous No.10411718]

To allow a man to penetrate you is to become as demoralized as a conquered state. It is one of the reasons, in my estimation, that women are so fucked up psychologically. Women are Gaulish tribes to the Roman armies of man. Their sadism is in itself the deepest source of their inherent and eternal inferiority. They simply have zero potential to dominate men, lacking as they do the physical means (a penis) to impregnate others (like an imagined two-tier system of women who can breed with other women, and those who can only be bred). Imagine waking up *wanting* to be conquered. It is unimaginable for most men, who only either want to conquer others, or simply protect their little independent nation as best they can. Homosexuality is irrelevant here, as they are not desired by women. Women react to their biological circumstance in many ways. I've seen it first-hand. Intelligent women tend to be very misogynistic, like intelligent niggers who can't bear to be associated with the shit-throwing ape community they belong to and are thus identified as being. So they become misogynistic and simply LARP as beta males, or instead they become a fifth column male and try to take manhood down from the inside as with this schizo Jew. But I repeat, Valerie Solanas has a point when she describes inter-sex relationships as essentially brutal and imbalanced. Only self-deceiving nu-males and alt-women have parity in their relationships, and they tend to break up often or numb themselves to their deeper instincts. I really don't think enough people on this board or elsewhere have really taken the time, as I have, what physical inter-penetration among the human species really, truly represents.

[Anonymous No.10411720]

>>10411703
Insects aren't the same as Humans.

[Anonymous No.10411721]

>>10411618
>inter-personal penetration
Just call it sex?

[Anonymous No.10411722]

>>10411718

Think about it. What is the worst thing a man could do to you (a fellow man)? It isn't killing him, because there's honour in dying in battle. It isn't beating him up, because wounds heal and again there's honour in the struggle. It isn't losing to him in a bet, or working a shittier job, or coming second place in a competition. It's being fucked in the ass. That's a fact. Really think about it. Picture it, if you must. Being fucked in the ass. That's the worse thing a guy could to me, a fellow guy. It is humiliating on a deeply instinctive level, deeper than the vast majority of other humiliations a man can suffer. It is emasculating, weak and cowardly. It is irredeemable. No dictator was ever fucked in the ass. No warlord allowed himself to be buggered. But for women, this is not only expected of them but *desired* by them. But the fact they aren't allowing tens if not hundreds of men to penetrate them during their fertile years suggests there's an element of shame involved. And I'm not talking only about the ass, by the way, because women have another at the front of their body.

[Anonymous No.10411725]

the recipient of the penetrative act cannot be a true submissive, first of all, we need to understand that this submissive-masochist dynamic appears two-fold on this situation, while she is indeed being the recipient of the phallus, we cannot forget that it is a consensual act. However in order for this consensual act to happen, the female has to agree and decide that she wants to be the penetratee. It is this decision what gives women the upper hand. This leads to the fact that the woman is in charge of deciding if copulation with an individual is worthy or not, in this dynamic the male is forced to comply to her desires, or else he faces rejection.

We can easily see how this dynamic is true in a very specific situation, where this dynamic is broken; rape. Rape is but the abolition of this social order that lies within the basic notions of human sexual dynamics. Rape is penalized because it empowers the male. It gives him the power to engage in copulation without the necessary consent of the female.

Let's not forget the following, males have a certain standard to attain in order to become a partner. Males have to compete not only in the physical aspect, but on the social and economic ones aswell. Males with no power, are simply disregarded.

Females on the other hand don't need to comply to any standards, and before you bring up feminist garbage about fatties, body image and so on, within these social circles, females still have the upper hand. A fat feminist attacks the good looking Stacys as a defend mechanism, but she still controls all the beta orbiters and decide if they are potential partners or not. These beta orbiters cannot fight Chad so they lust over the Fat Feminist instead.

We can see that, even inside the different social classes, this dynamic holds true. Which brings us to my original point, women are the sadists, not as the fetishized notion of sadism, but as the role who holds the power

/r9k/ sends it's regards

[Anonymous No.10411728]

>>10411720
Yeah that post seems out of place, must have been a troll trying to make OP look stupid with that post. I doubt some one who wrote that excerpt would talk about humans and mantis. Sure it is cool that he brought up some examples in which the female does bite back, but it has nothing to do with the idea he is trying to say.

[Anonymous No.10411737]

>>10411572
itt: The same conversation, post for post, taking place in r9k over this, only ironic.

[Anonymous No.10411738]

>>10411572
>>10411618
>evo-psych
>philosophy

choose one

[Anonymous No.10411766]

>>10411720
This is true. So you need something further than "sex with a man requires submission" to validate your claim, something specific to humans. Based on your other writings, it seems this thing is "consciousness." That when you are self-aware, this makes the act of penetration a necessarily submissive act. This is a stronger argument. In the most basic sense, sex between men and women requires an activity, and a receptivity, and both parties are aware of this. Sex seems then, for the man, mediated through the women.

However, there are things complicating this relationship. For instance, women choose who to have sex with, they are the "gatekeepers" of relationships. In this sense, sex in its entirety is no longer for the man, but in fact for the women! And this too can be argued against; it is the man who typically propositions the woman, and thus again it is he who is active and she who is receptive. Now the relationship in its entirety is for the man. But relationships of this nature typically involve men spending resources on the women, so again the relationship is not for men, but for women.

This sort of dialectic process can go on for quite a while, until you get to a point where one party is FOR the other, but also FOR itself, and vice versa. We call this love in the human species.

[Anonymous No.10411777]

>>10411766
And I should point out, the natural product of this sort of love should be a uniting of the two parties; this is found in their child, who is the product of both parents.

[Anonymous No.10411781]

>>10411725
>A fat feminist attacks the good looking Stacys as a defend mechanism, but she still controls all the beta orbiters and decide if they are potential partners or not. These beta orbiters cannot fight Chad so they lust over the Fat Feminist instead.
I don't want to seem like a retard for falling for some obvious bait...
I guess I wouldn't know where to start if this wasn't bait. Got a good chuckle regardless. The disturbing thing is that I've heard this sentiment given elsewhere but unironically. It's like r9k and incels have fashioned a completely fictional realm of sexual-social interaction complete with rpg-like character types. They are not simply reacting to the actually present hyperreality of modern sexuality; they have set up a complete non-reality to react to which drives them farther and farther away from the experiences that would expose the fiction.

[Anonymous No.10411803]

What is this autism and where can I get more?

[Shakespeare comment No.10411829]

As much as I'd like to laugh about this, it has eerie tonal echoes with what a friend of mine wrote before his psychotic episodes. I don't think he could tell if he was being serious or not either. Get help OP.

[Anonymous No.10411830]

>>10411781
get the fuck out you normie cuck

I genuinely hope everyone you love gets cancer

[Anonymous No.10411840]

>>10411725
>the recipient of the penetrative act cannot be a true submissive
are you a girl or a gay?
The biggest reason for homophobia and the inability to accept homosexuals, is the subconcious hatred and fear of a man getting their ass fucked. Any man would fuck a man ass (trap) on the other side of a glory hole if he was told it was a woman. But the prospect of the other way around, is enough to vehemently hate the concept of homosexuality.

[Anonymous No.10411846]

>>10411829
>this topic and material touches close to home in a weird way and makes me think about myself, my life, and the world deeply, so I am going to say there is something wrong with you to make myself feel better and hopefully make other anons think there is something wrong with you and hopefully make you question your motives, abilities, and perspectives, because I have really become quite flustered, because I am a 17 year old girl

[Anonymous No.10411850]

>>10411781
A wild not an argument appears! It uses: Not an argument. it is not effective

[Anonymous No.10411856]

>>10411830
Maybe when you get to high school, you'll figure things out.

[Anonymous No.10411857]

>>10411846
>evidence that might suggest I'm delusional is actually evidence that I'm on to something!

[Anonymous No.10411874]

>>10411857
>evidence that might suggest I'm delusional
im not the writer of that, just would more quickly defend what they have put forth based on effort and merit, compare to what you have put forth, the post I attempted to mock.

So I missed this:
>evidence that might suggest I'm delusional

Oh, wait nevermind... that was you feeling as if there were some similarities in writing style between the writer and your psychotic friend. What fabulous evidence for op to be delusional, what extraordinary evidence. You could be purely innocent and purely looking out for them, or you could be the delusional one, and doing as I suggested. Could you even admit you were offended if you were? Why would someone be offended by something that had no hint of truth?

[Anonymous No.10411885]

>>10411618
you should write for social matter

[Anonymous No.10411895]

>>10411840
you're leaving out that it's a fear of being violently rayped and castrated which is what happened to men before the Christian church and then the rule of law in Republican European states. In ancient times, if you lost a battle, you had a 1/3 chance of dying, 1/3 chance of being conscripted, 1/3 chance of being some kind of slave (which usually meant sex toy or piece of equipment worked to death)

[Anonymous No.10411907]

>>10411618

GOLD

[Anonymous No.10411933]

>>10411725
WEAK WEAK WEAK

interesting idea but delivered poorly, fixating on the wrong aspects, begging to be BTFO'd by most intellectuals. Try harder next time sweetie if you're going to steal other people's ideas and then muck them up publicly

[Anonymous No.10411963]

>>10411829
nice pic. Where did you get it from?

[Anonymous No.10411975]

>>10411618
>>10411969

[Anonymous No.10411996]

yfw this is Pynchon getting into the mindset of an angry teenage incel for his next book about an angry teenage incel that uncovers a deep conspiracy about shit eating women

[Anonymous No.10412078]

>>10411781
This is a good post. but keep in mind that all of us are essentially living in our own private fictional realms. In the case of most people, continuous social interaction from childhood tends to result in a convergence in the structures of their private realities. In the case of less socialized people, this error-correction mechanism doesn't take place. And in the case of /r9k/ and incels, the socially interaction that emerges out of a community of frustrated outcasts actually serves as an echochamber to reinforce simple minded concepts that are unhelpful for explaining reality, and which only serve to reinforce an existing miserable state of mind.

[Anonymous No.10412323]

>>10411590
I'll read your suicide note before I click on this link.

[Anonymous No.10412347]

>>10411572
Despite how sad of a state OP is in, I'm happy in knowing that I'm not nearly as delusional as him.

[Anonymous No.10412365]

>>10411618
so the most important philosophical manifesto is a pseudoscience rag devoid of any source material or survey material?

[Anonymous No.10412379]

>>10411572
>writing something profound
>can't figure out how to arrange a dead man's switch

[Anonymous No.10412456]

>>10411572
attack the attributes in a generalized fashion without naming your target instead. Let the reader incriminate and associate who they will.

[Anonymous No.10412490]

OP is the white ghost of Patrice O'Neal

[Anonymous No.10412494]

>>10411857
Seriously OP mentioned something in the other thread about already being schizoid. You probably need a psych anon

[Anonymous No.10412872]

Print it onto paper.

[Anonymous No.10412890]

You really are something else Warosu-chan.

[Anonymous No.10412985]

>>10411618
>therefore
>as I have demonstrated
>'inter-personal penetration'
>In order to
>'thus'...'thus'

And this is from 3 1/2 lines that are meant to be among the most impressive.

[Anonymous No.10413001]

Publish it as a blog.

Publish it as an ebook once it is finished. Put the ebook on every filesharing platform you can find. One of those should survive you

[Anonymous No.10413045]

>>10411572
You need to find the hot tumblr sites.

[Anonymous No.10413065]

>>10411618
>Women don't want sex
>thus

[Anonymous No.10413067]

>>10411781
We don't live in a "hyperreality of modern sexuality" faggot, we don't have fully immersive AI to blur the difference between real life and fake life.
We don't live in ANY form of hyperreality you pretentious faggot.

[Anonymous No.10413073]

>>10413067
um

[Anonymous No.10413110]

>>10411572
>>10411618
This is why I browse this board

[Anonymous No.10413234]

You are literally just repeating the evo-psych speculations from r/redpill but with bigger words. If this is your treatise it’s painfully unoriginal and you shouldn’t be surprised when nobody pay attention once you’ve released it.

[Anonymous No.10413256]

>>10411618
hey buddy try having sex first before you write about it

[Anonymous No.10413394]

>>10412347
What did he say the is incorrect?

[Anonymous No.10413399]

>>10413394
Hang yourself.

[Anonymous No.10413530]

Goonan already did it.

[Anonymous No.10413654]

>>10413399
Precisely, which particulate of data was brought forthwith provably incorrectly?

[Anonymous No.10413663]

>>10413530
How many books have you sold by spamming the chans ?

[Anonymous No.10413748]

We need to ban /r9k/ crossposters

[Anonymous No.10413769]

>>10413654
what am i reading?

[Anonymous No.10413853]

>>10413769
Oh, a brainlet, nevermind...carry on. How is the weather today little buddy? Will you get a lollipop today? I hope so, have a good one special friend

[Anonymous No.10413903]

>>10413853
>mfw

[Anonymous No.10413984]

>the very act of inter-personal penetration is an intensely and necessarily humiliating for the penetratee
that strange place where radical feminism and radical misogyny unite

[Anonymous No.10414040]

>>10411642
kek

[Anonymous No.10414076]

>>10413654
Is this just another part of a bait thread with a ridiculous amount of effort from many sides or do you actually think talking like a poorly written Big Bang Theory character makes you sound smart?
There was no data in any of op's rambling you faggot. He's trying to take evolutionary psychology (a field full of all sorts of nonsensical and/or contradictory horseshit among its few solid breakthroughs) and use it to justify his feelings of intense hatred for women not having sex with him. He posted it on /r9k/, for fuck's sake.

[Anonymous No.10414238]

>>10414076
>He posted it on /r9k/, for fuck's sake.
>I ASSume anything possibly posted on /r9k/ cannot contain any Truth at all...for fuck's sake, of course.

[Anonymous No.10414265]

>>10411618
Don't mind all the sjw haters on this board
Your book is probably going to be a 4chan classic soon after it gets published

[Anonymous No.10414281]

>>10411618
>"It is therefore clear that masochism and its associated psychological corollaries (self-loathing, submissiveness) are in fact evolutionary advantageous traits in the female gender. As I have demonstrated, the very act of inter-personal penetration is an intensely and necessarily humiliating for the penetratee. In order to encourage reproduction and thus the survival and indeed proliferation of the Will, the human female is thus genetically inflicted with the self-loathing mechanism which compels her to act in a submissive and self-destructive manner, if only for the sake of finding the notion of being penetrated by a man (or, indeed, by several man simultaneously) not only necessary but desirable."

Here, I am going to make some grammatical corrections and adjust it a bit for clarity:

"It is therefore clear that masochism and its associated psychological corollaries such as self-loathing and submissiveness are in fact evolutionarily advantageous traits in the female gender. The act of intercourse is an intensely and necessarily humiliating experience for the penetratee. In order to encourage reproduction and thus the survival and proliferation of the Will, the human female is genetically inflicted with the self-loathing mechanism which compels her to act in a submissive and self-destructive manner if only for the sake of finding the idea of being penetrated by a man not only necessary but desirable."

You might even want to lose the entire "The act of intercourse is an..." sentence because it doesn't quite feel like it fits into the development that you began with the first sentence and ended with the last and you imply that you have already "demonstrated" its truth so it's probably not necessary.

Honestly, I doubt that you have the knowledge and experience to write some sort of "revolutionary" philosophical text right now because everything in this paragraph feels like nothing but speculation and also nobody with any actual merit to their ideas would start a thread like this.

[Anonymous No.10414525]

I've also been writing something, although I doubt it'll be influencal or reach any levels of publicity. It is mostly for me to, more than anything, synthesize and spit out again everything I've been reading and to sum up my (definitely not philosophically rigorous) thoughts on society.

It started as a response to Popper's paradox of tolerance. I posit that the state of being a singular society, of having any burden shared between people, is an obstacle to tolerance (if any one tolerant society will be destroyed by its own tolerance). The world should be organized in a series of multiple intolerant (or tolerant, although to protect their own destruction as proved by Popper they will likely become intolerant to some degree) societies, with no common burden besides sharing the same physical world, as a meta-society of competing unions of people doing what they believe will create an ideal society. If you've read Nozick this will be familiar, I draw from him (as well as Moldbug's "patchwork" concept, as well as to argue against democracy [as with Hoppe and others]) frequently. I argue against Arthur Desmond-esque Might Is Right natural law, in that I think it's in everybody's self interest to let everybody else persue their own self interest, because no one is omniscient, and so no one can be perfectly sure that whatever they do will increase their happiness or material success (or whatever metric they use to measure success) more than anything else. Your best bet is pretty much to let others have freedom to see what they do, so you can learn from that knowledge. I draw from Hayek in a sense, in that not only can economies not be centrally planned do to individual lack of knowledge but also societies, even if you don't think there's any epistemological incentive for anyone to do anything but help themselves. I'm fond of Discordianism: schisms are good and uniformity, or what I characterize as globalist-modernity, is bad. I have multiple arguments for this, and I try to make the case that the political events of the last couple years (over which my "manifesto" has been written and scrapped and redrafted etc) has been the result of an unprecedented paradigm of globalist-modernity that alienates and atomizes and oppresses alternative models of society and creativity. I think that the political tension and everybody's deep, inchoate feelings of dread are due to the expansion of the state (and its cultural apparatus, any part of culture you're "forced" to participate in, being forced to live in a singular society that contains the culture- I'm calling this coercive-culture as a shorthand) and that the solution is some kind of redistribution of sovereignty akin to the "exit" movements. This can happen via property, via residential lines eg provinces or counties, or situationally (i.e. places that will turn into communes can just become such). I'm probably not a very good writer, but hey, at least I'm writing.

>>10411618
Jesus that's autistic

[Anonymous No.10414543]

>>10411618
This reads like a weird misinterpretation of Andrea Dworkin which is probably the most insulting thing I could say to you.

[Anonymous No.10414582]

>>10414238
Sounds about right.
The disdain other boards have for robots is entirely justified. The board revolves around resentment and bitterness and desperate attempts to justify it without blaming themselves. Some of the most delusional people on the internet are there.

[Anonymous No.10414715]

>>10411657
Women have the power in this pc society where victims are promoted and power is shamed.

[Anonymous No.10414725]

>>10411722
None of this is a sound argument, just so you know.

[Anonymous No.10414732]

>>10411722
>Think about it. What is the worst thing a man could do to you (a fellow man)? It isn't killing him, because there's honour in dying in battle. It isn't beating him up, because wounds heal and again there's honour in the struggle. It isn't losing to him in a bet, or working a shittier job, or coming second place in a competition. It's being fucked in the ass
I don't believe you could have unintentionally skipped over castration. Why are you even on a lit board? Go back to your virginity support group.

[Anonymous No.10414777]

>>10414582
>anything possibly posted on cannot contain any Truth at all
>Sounds about right.
Extremist, absolutist, baby and bathwater, head in sand, head in cloud, ignoramus, idiot

[Anonymous No.10414783]

>>10414725
t. loves to get fucked in the ass

[Anonymous No.10414806]

>>10414732
Castration is pretty much just superficial. Meaning you could literally just move towns and have a new pair of testacles surgically attached and feel fine about life. But being penetrated will haunt you always. There's nowhere you can run to in order to escape the knowledge that you were once penetrated by a man. Only death. My girlfriend and I had a long serious discussion about this subject the other night over a glass of wine (or three!) and she pretty much agreed with everything I said about the capital-t True nature of inter-penetration and how it affected her as well. She agreed that it was harrowing the first time she was penetrated by a man, and even told me that a brain specialist told her that neurochemistry and neuro-linguistic pathways actually changed shape in order to accommodate the traumatic knowledge that she has been penetrated. When I pointed out that I might penetrate her one day (and raised both my eyebrows at the same time twice while wiggling my upper body in order to humour her) she said that it was "different" because having already been penetrated already by a man, every subsequent man (8 thus far, not including me to come) is, in her words, simply "echoing the violence of the first". It absolutely blew my mind how candid she was with me, and although we didn't end up having sex (not that night at least!) I left her studio flat at 4am and walked home through the rain knowing that my convictions and instinctive beliefs had been proven true, and that at last I had a case study to reference when putting all my countless complex ideas down on paper.

[Anonymous No.10414830]

There is no complex, fear, about a female being penetrated, because the hole feels realllly good. And society is structured that the women gets to choose what man is fortunate enough, after buying her gifts and performing challenging mateing ritual rights, to attempt to make her hole feel really really good.

There is nothing to worry about, no higher philosophy or psychology about it: I have a pleasure hole. A man has a pleasure stick. Whats the big deal, whats the big problem or significance, why should I think about anything """deep""" about my fundamental nature. My mouth is another pleasure whole I penetrate with food. A penis is just like food for my pussy. You guys are crazy.

[Anonymous No.10414846]

>>10414830
>A penis is just like food for my pussy.

see this is why diversity is good, a angsty neckbeard would not produce such a sentence

[Anonymous No.10414854]

>>10414830
Females don't actually enjoy, or are indifferent to, the physical sensation of having a penis inside their vagina. The pressure on the clitoris, and the psychological context in which the sexual intercourse takes place, is what puts them into heat. If you don't believe me I have a folder of 233 twitter and facebook screenshots written by women reinforcing my assertion, so don't bother with that. Also claiming food is similar to penis in any respect is just so entirely wrong that I am tempted to laugh aloud at your stupidity.

[Anonymous No.10414857]

>>10414854
yeah that was probably a tranny assuming her gay asshole is the same as a pussy

[Anonymous No.10414867]

>>10414857
The male shitoris is similar to the female "vagina" in a lot of ways, although it is interesting to consider that anal sex with a male is actually more pleasurable for the penetratee considering how the prostate is stimulated by a dominant and well-regulated thrusting of an erect penis into the male anus.

[Anonymous No.10414870]

>>10414854
I've been with girls who only get off through clitoral stimulation and ones who told me off for going near it, asking to be penetrated instead. It varies a lot from person to person. It's not like penetration *can't* stimulate the clit anyway, this seems to have a lot to do with how close the clitoris is to the vagina and makes sense in physical terms. This >hurr they're all pretending and the same is just silly.

[Anonymous No.10414873]

>>10411618
lmao i never get tired of this one

[Anonymous No.10414887]

>>10414870
>girls
>told me off for going near it

Was this in Thailand or summat? Also only a minority of people in this thread are claiming women can't enjoy sex. My own assertion is that it is their enjoyment is evidence of the innate masochistic tendency of women due to evolutionary strategies.

[Anonymous No.10414908]

>>10411618
/lit/ will shit on this but I'd buy it

[Anonymous No.10414917]

>>10414887
I was being hyperbolic, some, a minority, prefer penetration to clitoral stimulation. And I'm sure your evo-psych hypothesis is grounded in rigorous scientific data.

[Anonymous No.10414949]

maybe people just want to feel good together

[Anonymous No.10414951]

ITT

[Anonymous No.10414961]

>>10414806
those parentheses

[Anonymous No.10415015]

>>10414908
even r9k shit on it yesterday, saw it there yesterday. pleasantly surprised to witness this lunatic again.

[Anonymous No.10415044]

>>10414806
>Castration is pretty much just superficial.
Imagine living life doing mental gymnastics to this degree over something as silly as hating gay people

[Anonymous No.10415065]

>>10414830
you’re really stupid and i think you shouldn’t be allowed to vote or handle money honey
>>10414806
this is bait or you yourself are psychotic and stupid, every post you make reeks of stealing others ideas and repackaging memes as deep thought. your gf was just telling you whatever you want to hear. appealing to her while trying to argue women are inferior cum slaves is a logical contradiction. if you studied math or logic you’d know how to structure your thoughts properly. But, you haven’t. I suggest studying rhetoric, grammar and logic; the triumvriate is for you my pseud friend.

[Anonymous No.10415079]

>>10414806
That is absurd. You provide no explanation of why anal sex is so much worse than castration. You can move to a town where no one knows you were buggered. There's nowhere to run to escape the knowledge you were castrated.

[Anonymous No.10415100]

>>10414525
>popper
>vanilla nationalism
dude you stole everything from other people, /r9k/ shit on you because you’re a thieving pseud. fess up, you copied shit from JBP, Popper, Roosh, /pol/‘s hive mind and youtube videos. you use words that sound like you took them from theosophy and jung, you don’t seem capable of a single original thought and the worst offense, in my mind, is that you don’t seem to understand how to STRUCTURE your thoughts in a holistic, symmetric manner so that they can DO WORK. if your arguments don’t solve problems, they are useless rhetoric. I don’t see mental machinery, i see performative verbal diahrrea. I sort of agree with some of what you are saying, but this only because you’re restating well known truisms like: women are submissive, penetration had a psychological effect. WOWOWOW you’re such a deep thinker.

3/10 gotta be bait, i can’t believe anyone would be this corny and flat of a thinker
>>10414076
behavioral genomics and psychiatric genomics are much harder sciences anon, and they basically go even further without making the same assumptions that evo-psyche does (which isn’t a science as psychology isn’t a science)
>>10413748
i think this thread is a falseflag, please don’t ban the smart ones
>>10413234
yes he stole most of this

[Anonymous No.10415115]

>>10414949
>maybe people just want to feel good together
The average males prostate feels really good when stimulated: why doesnt the average male get stimulated by his girlfriend when they are together to just feel good?

[Anonymous No.10415131]

>>10415065
>you’re really stupid and i think you shouldn’t be allowed to vote or handle money honey
Since you are so much smarter than me can you show me wherein your sentence there might be contained a hint of an argument?

[Anonymous No.10415135]

>>10415065
t strong independent roastie whore

[Anonymous No.10415142]

>>10415079
there is only one way to find out: Science. You need to find this anon and give him the option, fuck him in the ass, or cut off his balls. To see if he puts his money where his ass is

[Anonymous No.10415150]

>>10415131
here’s my argument

you type in an unintelligent way; you also do not think deeply about what you say, before you say it; people who type in an asinine manner and who also lack abstract thinking skills are almost always going to be stupid; women tend to be stupid; you are a woman; so, its safe to say that you shouldn’t handle money or vote since those things require abstract thinking skills and would be demonstrated by intelligent, well ordered posts.

there you go sweetie, why don’t you go call up one of the boys in uour stable of resource pools and ask them to take you out for food and make your vj feel good so you can fall asleep tonight watching netflix without having to drink so much wine or take too much xanax.

:)

[Anonymous No.10415180]

>>10411718
you do realize that you can't really reconcile freud with poststructuralism, right?

[Anonymous No.10415216]

>>10415100
>popper
>vanilla nationalism
>dude you stole everything from other people, /r9k/ shit on you because you’re a thieving pseud. fess up, you copied shit from JBP, Popper, Roosh, /pol/‘s hive mind and youtube videos. you use words that sound like you took them from theosophy and jung, you don’t seem capable of a single original thought and the worst offense, in my mind, is that you don’t seem to understand how to STRUCTURE your thoughts in a holistic, symmetric manner so that they can DO WORK. if your arguments don’t solve problems, they are useless rhetoric. I don’t see mental machinery, i see performative verbal diahrrea. I sort of agree with some of what you are saying, but this only because you’re restating well known truisms like: women are submissive, penetration had a psychological effect. WOWOWOW you’re such a deep thinker.
I'm not the other guy. The post you quoted was my first post in the thread dude, if you had 4chan x (or simply read the post) you could see that.

[Anonymous No.10415398]

>>10414783
Pathetic response. You're not clever.

[Anonymous No.10415413]

>>10415150
Their post was much more intelligent than this. You're boring.

[Anonymous No.10415415]

It's interesting, because the female body isn't really designed to be penetrated, it's designed to be squeezed and rubbed. The male body on the other hand has a unique bivalence in that it's designed both to penetrate and, in its hardness, lends itself to being penetrated. Even the existence of a prostrate supports this, which is absent in women.

[Anonymous No.10415439]

>>10411572
>philosophical
>manifesto

[Anonymous No.10415492]

>>10411618
>or, indeed, by several man simultaneously
This is the point where I lost it

[Anonymous No.10415582]

>>10411618
Holy shit this is incredible. Both aggressive and solemnly beautiful. All you need to do now is take over a local army base while ranting about your esoteric right wing-traditionalist views, and then finish your display by allowing your gay student lover to ritually decapitate you as you cry about the decline of the universe.

I think that will definitely guarantee that people revere your manifesto for years hence.

[Anonymous No.10415665]

>>10415150
But; what you; just wrote; has nothing to do; with the topic; and it doesnt even appear; as if you took your own advice; to think deeply about what you are going to say; before you say it; all of your gripes have nothing to do with the topic; is why I asked; if you had any actual; argument of substance; do you want a second; or is it third chance now; to actually comment; on the substance; of the original post of mine; you responded to?

[Anonymous No.10415669]

>>10415180
give one general reason why

[Anonymous No.10415676]

>>10415398
>Pathetic response. You're not clever.
None of this is a sound argument, just so you know.

[Anonymous No.10415757]

>>10411618
This idea isn't new or interesting at all though.

[Anonymous No.10416079]

>>10411711
>>10411618
This
Evo-psych need to really take a fucking mountain vacation and just look at animals and think about who they want to be
Working backwards to justify your own shitty pathologies doesn't help anyone

[Anonymous No.10416142]

>>10411722
Dude. Julius Ceasar literally got fucked in the ass by the king of Bitheria. Get fucked.

[Anonymous No.10416173]

Incels should not have internet access.

[Anonymous No.10416187]

>>10415413
no it wasn't at all, you're just an idiot and not well read
>>10415665
the breaks are there to delineate the parts of the argument honey, I know you're an idiot and can't pass a basic logic course but that's what they're for.

could have just structured it like this:
1.
2.
3.
.:

But i thought that would confuse you since you're a lib-arts retard.
>all of your gripes have nothing to do with the topic
I can make a sub-thread or respond to a poster within the thread whose whining, which you were. You couldn't even deal with a formulated argument, you're abandoning that route now and trying to revise what you said
>if you had any actual; argument of substance; do you want a second; or is it third chance now; to actually comment; on the substance; of the original post of mine; you responded to?
you're really stupid, bordering on the consciousness of a 12 year old girl. I assumed you were just a female undergrad getting her English Lit degree but I don't even think you're a college level student or if you are you're the worst kind of diversity admission. Re-read what I wrote in response to you, you massive idiot. You were complaining like a fucking brainlet and spewing absolute drivel.
>There is no complex, fear, about a female being penetrated, because the hole feels realllly good. And society is structured that the women gets to choose what man is fortunate enough, after buying her gifts and performing challenging mateing ritual rights, to attempt to make her hole feel really really good.

There is nothing to worry about, no higher philosophy or psychology about it: I have a pleasure hole. A man has a pleasure stick. Whats the big deal, whats the big problem or significance, why should I think about anything """deep""" about my fundamental nature. My mouth is another pleasure whole I penetrate with food. A penis is just like food for my pussy. You guys are crazy.
this is what you wrote, you disgusting fucking whore. That's what I was replying to, was that not clear? OP is demonstrably stupid, and I've already shown what the issue is with his thesis, along with it being stolen from other stupid people. Are you going to run away from that revolting snot rocket of a post that you made, "i am sexual, I like eating/fucking because I'm a hedonist, but I also don't believe in evolutionary biology at all heehee, give me attention boys"

Lol at you missy, please drop out of school, stop taking your pills, get your head screwed on straight, learn to cook and please a man properly and get one who is almost as dumb as you but higher conscientiousness so he can prevent you from lapsing into whoredom. Il'll pray for you sweetie, you're gonna need all the help you can get, I'll have to petition all kinds of deities and powers to save you.

[Anonymous No.10416195]

>>10411618
Mother of God.

[Anonymous No.10416216]

>>10416142
t. Cato

[Anonymous No.10416236]

>>10411618
>(or, indeed, by several men simultaneously)
Please be real

[Anonymous No.10416312]

>>10411622
you're going places kid

[Anonymous No.10416376]

>>10416187
>this is what you wrote, you disgusting fucking whore. That's what I was replying to, was that not clear?
Sheesh, I am sorry you are made at me because my writing made you horny and maybe you are on no fap and maybe you are not but you have no one to fuck so you are angry at me and your self: BUT, you still did not address a single actual thing I wrote. Reread everything you wrote to me, and it is only the mad raving rants of a psychotic lunatic spewing ad hominems at pidgeons on a park bench with wine breath

[Anonymous No.10416389]

>>10411618
Wow. It's like Mein Kampf but even more pseudo-scentific, gay and whiny. Well done.

[Anonymous No.10416402]

>>10415676
How does one argue against a reply like "t. loves getting fucked in butt"? Do you think saying that proves your claims?

[Anonymous No.10416489]

>>10416402
I don't agree with the totality of that original post you responded to and the conclusion of it being: The worst thing that can possibly happen to a man is being fucked in the ass.

But I do agree there were salient and valid points made: And it is quite self evident that the person to be quickest to deride that posters '''theses'''' (without throwing the baby out with the beit dirty dirty bathwater) would be someone who doesn't mind getting fucked in the ass.

Getting fucked in the ass is the (ok...one of thee.... you see, thats entirely different now, and maybe you wouldnt have said the arguments are unsound) worst thing that can happen to a man.

I love getting fucked in the ass, so that cannot be true.

We know there are worse things and hopefully that poster was exaggerating, and/or trollbaiting.

[Anonymous No.10416495]

>>10411622
Nice OP. VERY nice.

[Anonymous No.10416523]

>>10416402
>>10416489
It stems from the general hatred of lack of control. The concept of submission in general I guess.

And likely related to the very fact of not having eyes in the back of the head. Walking through the jungle hunting for food, to feel something behind you may mean certain death. This instinct, as well as the fear of damaging such a vital and potentially delicate orifice, may be why that original poster you responded to would, to some, so blow out of proportion the proposition of getting the ass fucked. And I proposed it is possible, this very, complex, is possibly a large reason for the existence of homophobia, the inability to accept and trust that a man can be so ok with so letting his guard down. To become so passive, submissive, feminine.

[Anonymous No.10416537]

>>10411777
Good post.

[Anonymous No.10416887]

>>10411622
>And I bring you into the light....
If OP is baiting top tier
If OP is serious please stop

[Anonymous No.10416892]

>>10411572
papa ted has the answer you seek

[Anonymous No.10416897]

>>10411660

[Anonymous No.10416941]

>>10411572
Just by your lines and image I know:
>That you're paranoid
>That you're pretentious
>That you're delusional
>That you're a faggot
Post at least a paragraph or fuck off back to being high you neet

[Anonymous No.10416943]

>>10411722
>Think about it. What is the worst thing a man could do to you (a fellow man)?
>It's being fucked in the ass. That's a fact. Really think about it.
I thought about it and I'm perplexed that you apparently forgot about the existence of castration.
>And I'm not talking only about the ass, by the way, because women have another at the front of their body.
You had better be shitposting, because you literally just used a sentence to say "front-butt."
I'm assuming this is ironic because it's almost beyond moronic. Given that: you ought to find something better to do. My addiction to this catharsis of laughing at, and simultaneously feeling sorry for, infantile dumbasses on the internet is stopping me from accomplishing things.

[Anonymous No.10416958]

>>10411720
They're the same as /pol/tards and /r9k/ posters though.

[Anonymous No.10416997]

Itt: OP finds he's a closet homosexual

[Anonymous No.10417077]

>>10414525
This reads as libertarian nationalist in the style of Camille Paglia. It's a good start, anon, but It needs to be a little more extreme to be memorable.

[Anonymous No.10417090]

>>10416943
>>And I'm not talking only about the ass, by the way, because women have another at the front of their body.
>You had better be shitposting, because you literally just used a sentence to say "front-butt."
No person could possibly say that in seriousness.

Right anons?


Right?

[Anonymous No.10417100]

>>10414806

[Anonymous No.10417119]

>>10416376
ROASTIE GETTIN TOASTY

no signs of sapience, can’t deal with logic, can’t outwit me when im hungover and high out of my mind, sleep deprived and shitposting. has to resort to inserting her vagina into things, is thinking about my cock too, probably going inside of you or cumming on you, because you’re pathetic and crave male sexual approval constantly, you’d cease to exist socially without it. Go make a sandwich for one of your fuck buddies you filthy, 90 IQ, diversity admission, lib arts xanax-wine-cum whore. I don’t even want to know how many men you’ve touched, sick little cow. Daddy wasn’t nice to you? Mommy was a sad grill, she didn’t get no respect from poppa? I bet daddy paid extra attention to you after you started blooming tho, started controlling where you could bring that cunt of yours. So, naturally, like all subhumans, jealous of others, you rebelled like the little Lilith that you are. Did it hurt? The first time a man penetrated you, came inside your hole and then abandoned you for his friends, people he could actually relate with?

Get fucked, seriously, go put your Money where your mouth is, im sure you’re good at that. Using your mouth and getting resources with it. What’s your doctoral thesis gonna be on? “My vagina is a vending machine; my throat is a site for men to deposit seed and test their grip strength. I have 5 std’s from my liberation journey, and much like battle scars, while the pain stays with me, oozes out of my snatch, i know i served for my species. The subhuman female race”

Sad!

[Anonymous No.10417128]

>>10417119
Wow. Just wow.

I can't even.

[Anonymous No.10417134]

>>10417128
and thus the armies of Satan were vanquished and the words they uttered in perfect uptalk, w/vocal fry and a classic filler word
>Wow
>I can’t even

[Anonymous No.10417146]

>>10411618
just send copies to the nearest news outlet, and drop the main thesis on youtube

[Anonymous No.10417182]

>>10411572
Post it online and send it to twelve different news stations before committing to your wacky PR stunt

[Anonymous No.10417196]

>>10411618
I honestly wanted to bash you but that's a very interesting point of view, one which I haven't found anywhere else, publish it asswipe

[Anonymous No.10417206]

>>10415669
because when all you have is a hammer, everything is a penis

read anti-oedepus

[Anonymous No.10417210]

>>10414806
Thanks for the pasta

[Anonymous No.10417257]

>>10411618
As a woman I have to say thank you for posting this. I read it for the first time yesterday and I've been thinking about your post ever since. It speaks to me like no other piece of writing ever has, and believe me I have tried to find the answer to my psychological disposition for a very long time. To lay down nude and open your legs knowing the man nearby is going to place his erect penis, in a forceful and aggressive manner, inside your body really is a life-changing moment for girls, like me. On a data-day basis I avoid people for the most part, and whenever there has ever been an argument between people I have always avoided it because I just can't deal with confrontations and potential violence. But then I've also always been told that to fulfill my existential role certain things will be demanded of me, and that I will have to respond to them in an accommodating, enthusiastic manner. Inter-penetrative sex is just one of those things, and by far the mast significant. But I've never been able to properly articulate why it is I feel so much "different" now, after serving as the penetratee in an act of inter-penetration, than I did as a younger girl. Never before did I really appreciate the trauma and harm inflicted by such an act, nor indeed had I ever come across an answer to the question as to why throughout my life I have felt inferior, weak, dependent and worthy of punishment despite my best efforts to be kind, helpful and so forth. OP this is going to be a strange thing to ask, but if you would be willing I would like to enter a relationship with you, long-distance at first but with the potential of meeting up in real life. As my guide and my guru, I believe you can unlock my potential as a woman and also teach me new things about myself. In return I offer you my body (for external exploration and erotic stimulation) and also my loyalty as a partner and muse. I'll just have to end it here by saying thank you again, thank you. Oh and to any boys here, let me make one thing clear: I will NEVER allow myself to be penetrated ever again, and my sisterhood network will be informed about the reality of this act and what it does to us. Your genocide stops here.

[Anonymous No.10417260]

>>10413067
sorry sweaty, looks like you need to read some Baudrillard

[Anonymous No.10417266]

holy fuck /lit/ has the most lit shit posting

[Anonymous No.10417281]

>>10416943
>>10414732
*You* are not a female, and thus have no way of comprehending the vast, largely subconscious influence the penetrative act inflicts. While you may simply brush off being penetrated as something you can stoically recover from, I promise you that from the moment the erect penis enters your hindquarters your entire psychological make-up will be shaded a different hue, and your physical brain will actually restructure itself on a neuro-chemical level in order to accommodate the trauma.

[Anonymous No.10417284]

>>10417257
Yes, I will date you Memeoire, give me your contact

[Anonymous No.10417553]

>ctrl f "weininger"
>nothing
>mfw

All philosophical ideas can already be found in Plato including OP's. Plato said that women were the reincarnations of wicked men.

All the presumed virtuous qualities of women disappear as soon as you actually imagine what it would be like to be one.

[Anonymous No.10417626]

>>10417281
Yeah but is that worse than having your penis and testicles severed from your body? This was the contention that was at stake.
>and your physical brain will actually restructure itself on a neuro-chemical level in order to accommodate the trauma.
As I suppose the "physical brain" does given any sort of trauma. Do you think castration is more or less traumatizing?
>I promise you that from the moment the erect penis enters your hindquarters your entire psychological make-up will be shaded a different hue
So am I or am I not incapable of "comprehending the vast, largely subconscious influence the penetrative act inflicts"? You have yet to prove to me the mechanism by which penetration brands its image onto the psyche. You have also yet to demonstrate the quantitative difference between the trauma of penetration and the trauma of any other violence. Come to think of it, you haven't even offered any anecdote. Is your 'theory' psychological or psychoanalytic? It really seems like a silly myth that you pulled out of your ass to justify an even more inconsequential statement about women.

[Anonymous No.10419060]

bump

[Anonymous No.10419075]

> "My Twisted World 2" by anon