/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.10389482]

Why is /pol/ so full of brainlets? If you try to analyze the discourse over there you'll eventually be amazed at how inexplicably retarded the posters are. In fact, there is no discourse. 99% is shouting the same shit over and over. This isn't being ironic, edgy, or trolling anymore. Shitposting nazi propaganda for years on a board for hours a day has to fuck up their mental state in some way.

How the fuck did this shit happen in the first place?

[Anonymous No.10389489]

Gonna contribute with an example, when /pol/ was asked to defend trump's decision to recognize jerusalem as israel's capital the most repeated argument was " it makes sand people mad XD"

[Anonymous No.10389491]

>>10389482
intel agencies+100 year old propaganda+republican parenting+memes+atomization+actual hatred and villification of whyte males=/pol/

there are askhual feds on /pol/ and they helped organize the stormnigger migration. hopping onto the conspiracy movemennt to do so.

btw putting “cute” pics of grills to attract (You)’s is debauched behavior and you’re a worse person for objectifying women in this way you massive hypocrite fag

[Anonymous No.10389501]

l e g s
>>10389491
Gay asf

[Anonymous No.10389502]

>>10389482
It's like that by design. The mods not only refuse to moderate /pol/ beyond the kind of shit that would get 4chan in legal problems, but they actively encourage the race to the bottom.

Anyway, none of this has anything to do with /lit/.
Please delete your thread while you still can.

[Anonymous No.10389505]

>>10389501
onjectifying women is gay as fuck, you’re a gay fucking consumer irony faggot who should swallow his tongue and jump off a bridge

[Anonymous No.10389506]

>>10389502
But why? What exactly is their goal here? I demand more transparency on this

[Anonymous No.10389512]

>>10389491
>"cute"

[Anonymous No.10389522]

jezebels etc and not literature

[Anonymous No.10389527]

>>10389506
>What exactly is their goal here?
Guilt by association. They went to reinforce the consensus that right-of-centre views are only held by paranoid cranks, imbeciles and uneducated rednecks. It's working.

[Anonymous No.10389534]

>>10389527
I wantto hear their reasoning for once, it probably has something to do with ad revenue or worse, datamining

[Anonymous No.10389541]

>>10389534
Maybe. (Can you please delete your thread and fuck off back to >>>/pol/)

[Anonymous No.10389543]

>>10389534
Or maybe its more to do the whole point of this fucking site is to have minimal moderator interference. Feel free to go to reddit instead if you want muh civilized discussion

[Anonymous No.10389545]

>>10389541
not my thread ok

[Anonymous No.10389548]

>>10389482
Why are you a faggot OP? this is a literature board, go complain about /pol/ in the meta board

[Anonymous No.10389555]

>>10389543
>4chan is for shitposting
It's you who need to fuck off back to plebbit.
Retarded newfag.

[Anonymous No.10389556]

>>10389505
lololol
Why is posting a pic of a girl, uploaded by the girl herself, objectifying said girl, you fucking schizo? If OP had posted an image from a male would you be bitching about how that is objectifying him?
Posting an image from someone isnt objectifying them, they already objectified themselves by being in an image

[Anonymous No.10389588]

Democracy has made politics fodder for the masses. It's one of those subjects where people consider themselves experts without actually engaging having to invest effort into learning or studying it, and subsequently don't even try to learn or study it. /pol/ is the logical end-state of this idea; a group of people who consider themselves hyper aware of the sociopolitical undercurrents driving current events, yet don't actually engage with any of the material that they talk about. Practically speaking, it's a combination of low-investment posters and a large numbers of posters, which has naturally flattened any potential discussion to disgruntled collective opinions. It's not all that different from reddit, just without the structure or moderation. especially since the_donald colonized it. Also this isn't literature, so fuck off.

[Anonymous No.10389593]

>>10389482
Brittany Venti came into the tinychat room once but left because we just told her how great a troll she was.

[Anonymous No.10389611]

How would /pol/ benefit from intelligent discourse? they're interested in "winning".

[Anonymous No.10389626]

>>10389482
/pol/ is reddit

[Anonymous No.10389636]

>>10389512
I would bang her.

[Anonymous No.10389655]

>>10389636
Me too

[Anonymous No.10389679]

>>10389655
I don't think she would make a good long term girlfriend though, too much of an attention whore.

[Anonymous No.10389699]

>>10389679
but those tits tho

[Anonymous No.10389751]

I browse both boards and one thing I’ve never seen is a thread on /pol/ whining about /lit/ so...