[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 613 KB, 498x498, 971.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10271745 No.10271745 [Reply] [Original]

should we not have to take blame/responsibility for our actions if we don't have free will?

>> No.10271751

>>10271745
Yes. But the question is, is OP man enough to admit he has free will?

>> No.10272032

>>10271745
We should always take responsibility for our actions.

>> No.10272044

>>10271745
>have to
>don't have free will

>> No.10272051

freedom within finitude within nature within the subject-object identity within myself within nature and so on.

>> No.10273046

>>10271751
We don't though

>> No.10273069

>>10271745
you can't really choose

>> No.10273286

>>10271745
Your actions don't need causality for you to make judgements on them.

>> No.10273333

If we don't have free will it isn't a question of should.

>> No.10273363

>>10271745

How free are we talking here? Suppose you have incomplete knowledge about your lack of choices, and believe to have, say, N choices about a certain matter M. Should you not be judged by picking one of these simply because you believed it was your choice? It means you had *intention* of doing it anyway didn't it? This is not a rhetorical question btw