/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.10271217]

>We [women] have to take in account all of this and we try to be so many things at once, and we have to take in so much stimuli, to process all this, so our logic is sort of... sort of this circumloquacious way of thinking, that seems insane

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBVbkPxSV1c&feature=youtu.be&t=46s [Embed]

Someone explain to me what she meant.

[Anonymous No.10271231]

>>10271217
id tap that.

[Anonymous No.10271234]

>>10271231
You're part of the problem hombre.

[Anonymous No.10271249]

all I want in life is to eat pussies until women cum in my mouth

[Anonymous No.10271250]

>>10271217
translation:
People have to be able to fully analyze the world around them, but women have it worse because they have to do that while also being retarded

[Anonymous No.10271263]

>>10271250
What does circuloquacious thinking mean though.

[Anonymous No.10271270]

>>10271263
>circumloquacious (adjective) : Using excessive language to evade a question, obscure truth or change the subject [comb. of 'circumlocution' and 'loquacious']
"women have to use circumloquacious thinking" = women are so fucking retarded that instead of figuring out how to solve things they just whine until they don't have to do it

[Anonymous No.10271271]

>>10271217
goddammit.
How the fuck is feminism supposed to fucking work when crazy people are allowed to publish shit like this?
There are a lot of established reasons why women think differently than men, but it's not because of fucking stimuli, are you fucking kidding me?

[Anonymous No.10271274]

>circumloquacious
>high verbal iq
>thinking that seems insane
>possible mental illness issues
>feminist comedian
>shlesinger

hmmmm, really firing up the ol' priors

[Anonymous No.10271281]

>It's just that we get painted with these broad brush strokes
>I polled ten women and they agreed
>I speak for all women
...

[Anonymous No.10271285]

>>10271271
She claims something about how women constantly try to pander to everybody and how they get stuck because their pandering goes into every microdecision.

[Anonymous No.10271288]

>>10271274
Saying circumloquacious is having a high verbal IQ? Couldn't she just said "circular thinking"?

[Anonymous No.10271303]

>>10271285
How old is she? It's not... entirely false, but that's... extremely poorly worded.

[Anonymous No.10271311]

>>10271303
I dunno. Around 35? But then I think she probably knows more about writing than we do. At least she wrote a book, that must mean something. Stupid people don't write books.

[Anonymous No.10271319]

>>10271311
>Stupid people don't write books.
Eeeeeehhh

[Anonymous No.10271322]

>>10271311
>Stupid people don't write books.

[Anonymous No.10271331]

she is so brave for talking out about this

[Anonymous No.10271337]

>>10271217
She means circuitous right?

[Anonymous No.10271413]

>>10271311
>Stupid people don't write books.
best thing ive heard all week.

[Anonymous No.10271418]

>>10271234
it isnt like shes saying anything of worth so what else was i supposed to take away?

[Anonymous No.10271466]

>>10271337
It's a portmanteau of circumlocutory and loquacious.

[Anonymous No.10271703]

Joe lacks so much balls it's amazing, get off the mic you senile old fuck

[Anonymous No.10271744]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDT2buOABvc

Women are funny, get over it biggots

[Anonymous No.10271811]

>>10271217
She's trying to figure out its not easy being human, but only associates it with her gender

[Anonymous No.10271927]

>>10271811
Ironically her gender is usually acts the opposite of what it means to be human.

[Anonymous No.10271970]

>>10271270
Until they've nagged a an into fixing it actually