[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

2022-05-12: Ghost posting is now globally disabled. 2022: Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
View page     

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 31 KB, 251x242, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10249221 No.10249221 [Reply] [Original]

>He thinks that a prior synthetic expressions of pure mathematics can be meta-metaphysically proven through an empirically based medium of epistemological inquiry

>> No.10249234

literally who still thinks that

>> No.10249236

a priori or a prior?

>> No.10249246

op btfo

>> No.10249248

a priori. My bad.

>> No.10249260

Nick Land is retarded enough to believe it, but his 4chan fanboys will defend him.
He doesn't believe in the validity of an apodictic yet non-empirically based medium of epistemological inquiry because (he claims) it involves a non-teleological assertion of positive nothingness. He thinks this is absurd, but anyone who has read ANY philosophy knows that there is absolutely nothing absurd in a non-teleological assertion of positive nothingness.

>> No.10249277

Not an argument

>> No.10249282

I don't speak autism can someone translate this

>> No.10249284

If you aren't familiar with modern philosophy, then perhaps you shouldn't be on /lit/

>> No.10249295
File: 15 KB, 291x311, Screenshot_20171023-152336.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>if you are just interested in literature, you shouldn't be on a board for literature discussion because we keep shitting it up with philosophy autism threads without even referring to literature

>> No.10249302

Philosophy IS literature

>> No.10249310

a square is a rectangle but a rectangle is not a square

yeah it's literature but literature isn't necessarily all this hyperautistic-level philosophy

>> No.10249314

Why is it hyper autistic? Because you don't understand it?

>> No.10249325

No, I'm just saying that you don't need to study philosophy to be able to appreciate literature and participate in discussions on it famalam. I honestly didn't know wtf OP was talking about because I hadn't heard of it, since philosophy is not something I have studied or plan to study.

>> No.10249333

no i don't!!!!

>> No.10249343

>He thinks mathematical truths you know of without necessarily ever experiencing and whose truthiness is reliant in their relationship to the world can be proven through studying metaphysics with just your sense.
Just fuck me up senpai.

>> No.10250652

W8, so op isn't trolling and his autism speak has meaning?

>> No.10250822
File: 28 KB, 640x449, Jacques Derrida says Viola.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]


>> No.10250839

Probably because people study different things in literature and philosophy and expecting them to know OP's retarded esoteric babble is, well, retarded. If OP really wanted a discussion, which he doesn't, he would've simplified what he said to facilitate it like this anon did >>10249343.

>> No.10251111

Sounds like someone needs to brush up on their dimensional analysis

>> No.10251127

>unironically using a singular indefinite article with a plural noun
I seriously hoped that you faggots wouldn't do this in the current year, alas here we are

>> No.10251144

You literally can't derive mathematical proofs without a posteriori knowledge.

>> No.10251272
File: 25 KB, 308x450, nyet bait.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]


>> No.10251563


>> No.10251616
File: 141 KB, 1180x1204, Literarystyles.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

> he can talk about epistemology and a priori synthetic expressions but he cannot solve a quadratic equation
t. absolute state of /lit/ pseud

>> No.10251623
File: 8 KB, 268x326, Luitzen_Egbertus_Jan_Brouwer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>he thinks mathematics doesn't depend on an intuition about the passage of time


>> No.10251629

>People think we can empirically express irrational numbers, fucking nerds amirite

>> No.10251631

i want to know how many anons who descant on math epistemology can solve a simple quadratic equation.
my prediction: 0.

kys pseud manlets

>> No.10251632

I would be this wojacks friend. We'd argue about audiobooks as a literary medium though.

>> No.10251636

Electrical engineer here
I'd even give you the complex roots

>> No.10251643

I'm so sorry, anon.

>> No.10251659
File: 213 KB, 1200x1200, ted-kaczynski-578450-1-420.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]


Quit your job.

Delete posts
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.