/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.10192303]

Has there ever been a prettier writer?

[Anonymous No.10192317]

How does she hold the pen with her paws?

[Anonymous No.10192326]

Senpai, tell me, did you like The Goldfinch?

[Anonymous No.10192327]

Several

[Anonymous No.10192336]

>>10192327
Not even close, son.

[Anonymous No.10192340]

>>10192317
> tfw no puggo writeru waifu

how does one even live

[Anonymous No.10192350]

>>10192317
>>10192340
That pug clearly has a penis, fellas

[Anonymous No.10192362]

[Anonymous No.10192365]

[Anonymous No.10192380]

qt af

[Anonymous No.10192385]

[Anonymous No.10192393]

>>10192365
This, but ironically

[Anonymous No.10192395]

>>10192336
>>10192327
Neither of these people are attractive.

[Anonymous No.10192402]

>>10192395
You do know that the first one you quoted is the same woman in
>>10192303
>>10192317
right?

[Anonymous No.10192410]

>>10192380
If you only approach her when she's looking sideways, perhaps.

[Anonymous No.10192481]

>>10192303

Yes

[Anonymous No.10192498]

>>10192303
>Has there ever been a prettier writer?
Most definitely.

[Anonymous No.10192509]

>>10192410
She looks nice.

[Anonymous No.10192516]

Interesting...
always assumed it was Sylvia Plath, but just compared pics, and you win
still like to read Austen every night
and Dickinson and Harper Lee more my type, I guess

[Anonymous No.10192538]

CNA

[Anonymous No.10192548]

so cute she had to be locked up

[Anonymous No.10192569]

[Anonymous No.10192582]

None of the responses to the OP's homely woman are attractive. These women are 4's or 5's on a generous scale. Writers are ugly people.

[Anonymous No.10192598]

The awful thing is that beauty is mysterious as well as terrible. God and the devil are fighting there and the battlefield is the heart of man.
-John Green

[Anonymous No.10192603]

Checkmate

[Anonymous No.10192604]

>>10192548
she also landed Hepburn her first role
based Colette

[Anonymous No.10192607]

>>10192509
You have absolutely horrible taste in women

[Anonymous No.10192631]

>>10192582
>Writers are ugly people.

[Anonymous No.10192662]

The idea of an artist posing for a photo shoot seems very disgusting to me

[Anonymous No.10192677]

>>10192303
She seems like an anime girl in that photo.

[Anonymous No.10192683]

[Anonymous No.10192953]

>>10192677
It's because she is.

[Anonymous No.10193011]

Do not post attractive people here in my sanctum. It is unbelievably triggering.

[Anonymous No.10193051]

>>10192953
She looks like Audrey Horne here.

[Anonymous No.10193057]

>>10192631
Came here to post this fine slice of boipucci.

[Anonymous No.10193068]

>>10192303
>letting a dog rest its asshole on your sofa

absolutely disgusting

[Anonymous No.10193081]

>>10193068
where else are ya gonna sit, anon?

[Anonymous No.10193086]

>>10193068
What, you eat your meals off of your couch cushions? The extent to which some posters here are neat-freaks perplexes me

[Anonymous No.10193100]

[Anonymous No.10193113]

[Anonymous No.10193194]

>>10193113
She's ugly, man. She has those slanty eyes and shit.

[Anonymous No.10193216]

>>10193113
Those are most definitely not aeronautically sound. It's like late 19th century American saloon whore trying to peak my curiosity. Imagine the disappointment when the flop comes and those tits droop. I suppose I'm just another contemporary shunning theatre in all it's grand majestic splendour.

[Anonymous No.10193247]

>>10193216
To be fair I think it's just the style of bras they wore back in the day. Conical and pointy, they were.

[Anonymous No.10193266]

I just can't stop Tartt posting.

[Anonymous No.10193385]

mai waifu

[Anonymous No.10193442]

>>10192303
I wonder if her pussy is tart

[Anonymous No.10193451]

Would have given everything for Gertrude to bounce on my cock - cowgirl style

[Anonymous No.10193461]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCOSG2jCOoM

1:33

[Anonymous No.10193474]

>>10193461
4:46

[Anonymous No.10193496]

>>10192662
I agree with this. I imagine a lot of the time with artists who usually come across as self-respecting though, it's the case that the publishing company is twisting their arm into taking the photo. I mean if Gaddis and McCarthy have photos than everyone has to have them.

[Anonymous No.10193500]

>tfw carson mccullers will never sit on your face

[Anonymous No.10193516]

>>10193496
>>10192662
They can probably have fun with it. Spending whole life in a little room, talking about other people and other things, to have a rare moment for the camera to be pointed on them, even from one who doesnt like photos taken, I can imagine it being fun to have fun with it, be goofy...but then that can come back and haunt your image, which is why there aren't a lot of mages of shakesphere, and some other historical writers

[Anonymous No.10193528]

>>10193500
Sounds like a nightmare desu

[Anonymous No.10193535]

>>10193516
There aren't many pictures of Shakespeare because he wasn't wealthy.

>>10192662
Muh pure art. It's promo material, you donk. The publisher needs it.

[Anonymous No.10193619]

>>10193535
>There aren't many pictures of Shakespeare because he wasn't wealthy.
would anyones feelings on shakespeare be different if he had photoshoots of like 50 photos dressing up in different outfits, smiling seductively or intently at the camera? (as anon suggested they had a problem with writers being photographed)

[Anonymous No.10193621]

>>10192365
didn't know she was ugly, now I like her even less

[Anonymous No.10193622]

>>10193500
thats a hell of a chin. or whatever is left of a chin
looks like hitchens little tryhard sister

[Anonymous No.10193630]

>>10193461
Thanks, anon
That video is heaven for several reasons

[Anonymous No.10193632]

>>10192662
they're promoting themselves, nothing wrong with that. plus, girls like feeling pretty so deal with it
I've noticed the majority are dressed surprisingly modest, almost like they're all moms. Cute

[Anonymous No.10193636]

>>10193535
WARNING: Not the same anon to whom you've responded.

I might be mistaken on the exact number, but Shakespeare had at least two, if not four properties. He owned at least one, maybe two residences in Stratford-upon-Avon and he owned Blackfriars Gatehouse in London. He may have also owned a separate property in London since he leased out Blackfriars Gatehouse. His grave in Holy Trinity was also not cheap.

Shakespeare was at least upper middle class... I consider that wealthy, especially since he owned a bit of property.

>By 1597, William, a theatre shareholder, had become so successful that he snapped up New Place, a large Stratford property that experts estimate had at least 20 rooms. Stratford residents even approached him for a loan: the archive has the only surviving letter addressed to Shakespeare, from townsman Richard Quiney, asking for 30 pounds (£30,000 today). Shakespeare reapplied for a family coat of arms, securing the coveted “gentleman’s” title for his father.

>Wells cites Shakespeare’s “big Stratford investments” as evidence that he divided his time between London and home. “He bought New Place; a lot of land in 1604; a share in the church tithes, an investment that brought him a lot of money; a cottage in Cottage Lane. For much of his life, he was investing in property,” says Wells.

From the Financial Times "Why Shakespeare was also a saavy property investor and developer"

[Anonymous No.10193654]

>>10193051
That's exactly what I was thinking

[Anonymous No.10193695]

>>10193630
Like Brett E Eliis, and what they are talking about?

[Anonymous No.10193700]

>>10193632
>having to promote your literary work by showing of your body

whores