/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.10172912]

So I know it's a meme but has anyone read it and what did you think?

https://archive.org/details/CultureOfCritique

[Anonymous No.10172925]

kys

[Anonymous No.10172951]

>>10172912
I thought it was interesting enough and not exactly what I expected. Fairly "moderate" (as far as these things go), even if the subject matter is the third rail of discussing critically. If I had to fault it for reasons besides particular political angles it'd be that it's predicated on certain fairly reductionist takes on history and the nature of culture and philosophy. It's missing the forest for the trees to some extent.
So overall I'd say it's nowhere near the silver bullet or smoking gun the alt-right memers who haven't read it would like it to be, and definitely not in line with the truly crazy occultist anti-Judaism, and though it's a crude and cliched "radical centrist" analogy, it is more accurate than not to call it the mirror image of racial politics criticising non-Jewish whites, just with a reversed reliance on biological determinism rather than social constructivism.

[Anonymous No.10173086]

>>10172925
t. illiterate

[Anonymous No.10173092]

>>10172912

Take this fucking anti-Semitic fuckshit back to /pol/

[Anonymous No.10173094]

>>10172925
fpbp

[Anonymous No.10173097]

>>10173086
good day you subhuman jew

[Anonymous No.10173103]

>>10173092
That is an anti-goyim canard. I kindly advise you to read the fucking book or gtfo.

[Anonymous No.10173104]

Ask the guy who started memeing this book anything. And no, I'm not a /pol/ retard, I just want this board dead.

[Anonymous No.10173108]

>>10173103
>>10172925

[Anonymous No.10173122]

It was written by a racist moralistic charlatan who doesn't like Jews or criticism to much.

Jewry was interested in wealth when Christianity still idealized poverty. Jewish moral-theology taught an extreme rationalism when Christians still believed in the Paulist-Augustinian notion of love. At the beginning of the capitalistic epoch, the Jews - because of their religion - were on an objectively much higher level than any Christian people.

Since heretics were excluded from public life they used their entire strength to perform economic activities. In heretical circles "money" was valued much more highly than in other groups of society. Money was their sole means to achieve power. Heretics in general always had the greatest role in banking, commerce and industry. Notice what happened where they were compelled to emigrate, the societies stagnated and never fully recovered.

[Anonymous No.10173124]

>>10173108
>>10172925
You first.

[Anonymous No.10173129]

>>10172925
>>10173092
>>10173094

[Anonymous No.10173130]

>>10173122
Shit pasta.

[Anonymous No.10173151]

>>10173129
>>>/r/t_D

[Anonymous No.10173152]

>>10173124
Choke on a gun, mongrel.

[Anonymous No.10173154]

>>10172925
this

[Anonymous No.10173159]

>>10173152
>projecting this hard

[Anonymous No.10173164]

>>10173151
>>>/f/acebook/

[Anonymous No.10173167]

>>10173129
Kek

[Anonymous No.10173178]

>>10173159
>choking this hard

[Anonymous No.10173184]

>>10173164
>>10172925

[Anonymous No.10173185]

>>10173178
>nonsense this hard

[Anonymous No.10173191]

>>10173184

[Anonymous No.10173195]

>>10173191
Get cancer and rot you fucking maggot.

[Anonymous No.10173197]

>>10173195
Boo hoo

[Anonymous No.10173206]

>>10172912
>>10172925
>>10172951
>>10173086
>>10173092
>>10173094
>>10173097
>>10173103
>>10173104
>>10173108
>>10173122
>>10173124
>>10173129
>>10173130
>>10173151
>>10173152
>>10173154
>>10173159
>>10173164
>>10173167
>>10173178
>>10173184
>>10173185
>>10173191
>>10173195
>>10173197
Kill yourselves, faggots. I've had enough of your bitching.

[Anonymous No.10173209]

>>10173185
Choke on a knife, cunt

[Anonymous No.10173212]

>>10173206
*curls up over your feet*
*purrs*
me no like kikes, mina-san =o.o=

[Anonymous No.10173213]

>>10173104
Why?

[Anonymous No.10173215]

>>10173212
Take your autism to /pol/, sperg. This is a literature board.

[Anonymous No.10173216]

>>10173209

[Anonymous No.10173221]

>>10173216
this isn't 9gag, anon

[Anonymous No.10173233]

>>10173215
>take that antisemitic book out of my literature board!
*hits your head with a spoon*

[Anonymous No.10173237]

>>10173233
Ah, yes! What a great discussion we had. Slit your wrists.

[Anonymous No.10173240]

>>10173233
Your mother shits my seed on your sheets everytime I visit. Cute gif, tho!

[Anonymous No.10173242]

>>10173237
You first, anon. Lead by example.

[Anonymous No.10173244]

>>10173240
Your mother told me you're impotent and have a micropenis.

[Anonymous No.10173245]

>>10173242
>no u
>>10173221
>>10173215

[Anonymous No.10173248]

>>10173244
Sperg-tastic post, anon!

[Anonymous No.10173251]

Boy, jews really don't like this book. Probably means it's worth reading.

[Anonymous No.10173254]

Such a nice thread!

[Anonymous No.10173257]

>>10173237
>>10173240
shoo shoo, heebs
go play with the oven!

[Anonymous No.10173258]

>>10173248
Don't be sad, anon.

[Anonymous No.10173261]

>>10173257
hats off brother kekistani!

[Anonymous No.10173263]

>>10173251
Yes, I quite agree.

[Anonymous No.10173264]

>>10173257
Is that all your money? Sad.

[Anonymous No.10173266]

>>10173261

[Anonymous No.10173267]

>>10173263
>>10173251
Kys samefag.

[Anonymous No.10173271]

>>10173266
Keep shitposting and I'll let you suck on daddy's shotgun, anon

[Anonymous No.10173275]

>>10173264
>implying you wouldn't get in there for less than that

[Anonymous No.10173277]

Steven Pinker says the book is a gigantic ad hominem therefore not worth his time. I agree

[Anonymous No.10173281]

>>10173267
No to both charges.

[Anonymous No.10173282]

>>10173275
How did I imply that? Of course I would. You're still poor and illiterate. Slit your wrists.

[Anonymous No.10173283]

>>10173277
(cont.)

Because I can't think for myself.

[Anonymous No.10173286]

Why are all you faggots posting? Is it because it's Saturday and you have no school? Is it because you're useless good-for-nothings? Is it because you didn't bother reading the rules, where it's cleary stated that you have to be over a certain age to post here? Seriously, read this fucking thread.

[Anonymous No.10173295]

>>10173282
I'm doing quite well, thank you. Good luck with your fantasies.

[Anonymous No.10173302]

>>10173286
It's the angry (((tribe))) trying to derail.

[Anonymous No.10173316]

>>10173271
I'll leave that honor to you, anon. You deserve it.

[Anonymous No.10173470]

Holy shit, jews really are complete psychos. Look at how they react to a post about a fucking book about them. How can anyone be surprised that the west is falling to shit with people like this holding power in our countries.

[Anonymous No.10173579]

This is the worse forced meme I've ever seen.

[Anonymous No.10173587]

>>10173579
I agree. If the anti-CoC shills actually read the book, and then drew their conclusions, it would be far better.

[Anonymous No.10173740]

>>10172912
He's not necessarily wrong and there is some truth to what he says.
The problem is he generalizes too much and ignores some historical contexts.
It's like writing a book about, say, Italians. Sure you'll get some things right, but you'll also miss a ton of stuff and the whole thing will be of questionable usefulness.

[Anonymous No.10174121]

>>10173740
But it is presumed italians dont have as much national and international power.

Lets say America was and is a multicultural/multi nationality melting pot, and lets say its tenets are freedom and capitalism, and so there is x amount of nationality a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l etc,,, living in America.

Who can complain and why, about what really...freedom and capitalism are the only truths.... if nationality d has or y or q or b has 5% of the wealth and power or 40% or 70%?

[Anonymous No.10174128]

>>10172912
Reminder that the first volume, A People that Shall Dwell Alone, received acclaim from both jewish and gentile scholars.
So it's not all just a meme friends.

[Anonymous No.10174156]

>>10172912
I know Hitler gets a bad rap for burning books, but every copy of this book should be burned and everywhere on the internet people try to discuss this book should be disrupted

[Anonymous No.10174185]

>>10172912
explains everything

>>10174156
lol

[Anonymous No.10174217]

>>10174128
The second volume was fairly well received as well.

[Anonymous No.10174218]

>>10173302
Fuck off back to /pol/ or your other anonymous crybox of choice with those trash brackets

[Anonymous No.10174265]

>>10174218
>he said as he cried on an anonymous board

[Anonymous No.10174304]

>>10174185
>scientific facts are social constructs
she's right, you know?

[Anonymous No.10174321]

>>10172912 (OP)
>>10172925
>>10172951
>>10173086
>>10173092
>>10173094
>>10173097
>>10173103
>>10173104
>>10173108
>>10173122
>>10173124
>>10173129
>>10173130
>>10173151
>>10173152
>>10173154
>>10173159
>>10173164
>>10173167
>>10173178
>>10173184
>>10173185
>>10173191
>>10173195
>>10173197
>>10173206
>>10173209
>>10173212
>>10173213
>>10173215
>>10173216
>>10173221
>>10173233
>>10173237
>>10173240
>>10173242
>>10173244
>>10173245
>>10173248
>>10173251
>>10173254
>>10173257
>>10173258
>>10173261
>>10173263
>>10173264
>>10173266
>>10173267
>>10173271
>>10173275
>>10173277
>>10173281
>>10173282
>>10173283
>>10173286
>>10173295
>>10173302
>>10173316
>>10173470
>>10173579
>>10173587
>>10173740
>>10174121
>>10174128
>>10174156
>>10174185
>>10174217
>>10174218
>>10174265
>>10174304

[Anonymous No.10174376]

>>10174321
Bazinga.

[Anonymous No.10174445]

well i wanted to know how the book was

[Anonymous No.10174480]

>>10174445
The amount of butthurt without argument should tell you that it's worth reading.

[Anonymous No.10174699]

>>10174480
Thinking this might be the truth, actually. Most recommendations considered “memes” are treated with bored rejection. The reaction to this book seems very dynamic and organized.

[Anonymous No.10174723]

>>10174480
this, I actually bough it the other day just because all the best books I've read are "controversial" on this board.

[Anonymous No.10175045]

It’s funny that none of the people who have attacked TCoC in this thread have tried to refute it.

[Anonymous No.10175124]

>>10173277
There's something so pathetic about this guy's physiognomy.

[Anonymous No.10175332]

The disappointing thing is this book actually isn't what people on either side think it is.

[Anonymous No.10175339]

>>10175332
bumping the thread with a tease
fuck you

[Anonymous No.10175487]

>>10173233
Cum for boxxy

[Anonymous No.10176064]

>>10175045
Did you come here this week? This forced meme has been getting posted twice a day for a while. At first there was some discussion among all the autism from both sides; now it's just spam, newfag.

[Anonymous No.10176081]

>>10174185
To be fair, scientific facts ARE social constructs. Reality isn't made of "facts". It's made of what the facts point to. The map is not the territory.

[Anonymous No.10176298]

one anon up top read the book and replied everyone else here hasnt read it

[Anonymous No.10176391]

>>10173215
>stop discussing a book on /lit/

[Anonymous No.10176400]

>There have been complaints that I am viewing Judaism in a monolithic manner. This is definitely not the case. Rather, in each movement that I discuss, my methodology has been:
>(1.) Find influential movements dominated by Jews, with no implication that all or most Jews are involved in these movements and no restrictions on what the movements are. For example, I touch on Jewish neo-conservatism which is a departure in some ways from the other movements I discuss. In general, relatively few Jews were involved in most of these movements and significant numbers of Jews may have been unaware of their existence. Even Jewish leftist radicalism—surely the most widespread and influential Jewish sub-culture of the 20th century—may have been a minority movement within Jewish communities in the United States and other Western societies for most periods. As a result, when I criticize these movements I am not necessarily criticizing most Jews. Nevertheless, these movements were influential and they were Jewishly motivated.
>(2.) Determine whether the Jewish participants in those movements identified as Jews AND thought of their involvement in the movement as advancing specific Jewish interests. Involvement may be unconscious or involve self- deception, but for the most part it was quite easy and straightforward to find evidence for these propositions. If I thought that self-deception was important (as in the case of many Jewish radicals), I provided evidence that in fact they did identify as Jews and were deeply concerned about Jewish issues despite surface appearances to the contrary.
>(3.) Try to gauge the influence of these movements on gentile society. Keep in mind that the influence of an intellectual or political movement dominated by Jews is independent of the percentage of the Jewish community that is involved in the movement or supports the movement.
>(4.) Try to show how non-Jews responded to these movements—for example, were they a source of anti-Semitism?

[Anonymous No.10177187]

>>10176391
We aren't allowed to talk about jews.

[Anonymous No.10177525]

>>10176391
Show me three (3) posts that talk about the book, mongrel.

[Anonymous No.10177556]

>>10173587
It would be a better forced meme?

[Anonymous No.10177585]

>>10174304
>>10176081
Actually yes. It is a necessary presupposition in sociological and philosophical study of science, since the researchers cannot accurately assess the validity of various competing theories in the field that they study. Of course it is misinterpreted by brainlets and used to sell their middle-brow ideologies

[Anonymous No.10177601]

>>10173086
Read the book or die, fucking cuck.

[Anonymous No.10177631]

it was shit

stop shilling it. you're damaging the board

[Anonymous No.10177708]

>>10177525
of course there aren't many. /leftypol/ attempted to derail the thread from the very first reply

[Anonymous No.10177714]

>>10177708
Nice boogeyman

[Anonymous No.10178108]

>>10177631
what is shit about it?

[Anonymous No.10178503]

>>10177708
Leftypol, right. Half the people who've posted are jews screeching so loud I can hear them through the screen.

[Anonymous No.10178508]

>>10172951
This shall be the one good post

[Anonymous No.10178526]

>>10173277
>Steven Pinker says the book is a gigantic ad hominem therefore not worth his time.

That's just a rubbish excuse for not wanting to address the arguments in the book, and wanting to trash it at the same time so that no one else will read it.

[Anonymous No.10178541]

Pinker didn't even read it. MacDonald discussed this again recently on his site: www.theoccidentalobserver.net

[Anonymous No.10178645]

>>10177708
what are false flags

[Anonymous No.10178795]

>>10178526
>>10178541
of course that kike didn't read it.

[Anonymous No.10179650]

DAS IST NICHT GUT GOYIM!!!!!!
SHOAH DER THREAD, SHEGETZ UND SHIKSAS!!!!!! YOU OWN NOTHING!!!!!!
DU IST GUT FÜR ESSEN SCHWARZE TUCHUS UND SCHEIßE!!!!!!

[Anonymous No.10181123]

Look at the first half of replies itt

[Anonymous No.10181161]

>>10181123
it called redpill, sweety

[Anonymous No.10181524]

>>10181161
no, sweetie

[Anonymous No.10182722]

>>10181524
It's worth reading for whites

[Anonymous No.10182788]

You could have a completely homogenous community of middle class wh*Tes. A nice town with almost no crime, an all round good community. However because of the weakness of the wh*Tes all it would take to destroy this community is one BLACK bull?

Just imagine, it's a nice sunny Sunday afternoon, imagine the bustle of this 100% wh*Te town until suddenly a couple of BLACK bulls walk up. Women would feel more attraction to these superior, strong bulls infinitely more than their pathetic wh*Te husbands. Every woman would be begging, grovelling to be impregnated by these overlords, the new kings of the town who earned this position with nothing but their superior presence. And these bulls wouldn't stop until every girl was carrying their children, the wh*Te women's original children would probably be neglected. Who the fuck would want to raise these inferior children? They are only going to turn out like their fathers.

The Men? The men would flee after realizing how futile their attempts at winning back their wives attraction would be. They would flee to Japan where they will try to win over FAS looking ugly Jap girls because they are the only things disgusting and lonely enough to accept them. Many would probably be rejected after the Japs hear of their shameful and dishonorable display, even they probably would have killed themselves to avoid the shame.

Back home in the once nice town, every woman will be raising their BLACK children and will be queuing up for their second or maybe even third pregnancy. They wont stop until they hit menopause, because they know deep down that their purpose is to populate the world with superior BLACK bulls who will then move on to destroy other towns. This is REAL colonization. You can't take over a place without winning the attraction or respect of the people, that method will always collapse.

[Anonymous No.10182822]

>>10182788
The sick jewish mind, folks. This is what woke white people keep warning you about, the deep perversion and mental illness of the jew.

[Anonymous No.10182825]

>>10182788
>>>/SHITTED/

[Anonymous No.10182872]

>>10182788
This is fuel for /pol/ conversion not how you combat it