/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.10170538]

>Start course on philosophy
>huh duh the greeks
>huh duh the mind is of a diferent characteristics that is not material
>more unprovable BS
>0 evidence being shown
>inb4 science has limits or some excuse as to muh epistomology/philosophy of science proves science is wrong
>le utilitarianism/positivims maymay
philosophy is for brainlets who can't do STEM.

[Anonymous No.10170545]

>thinks philosophy is bad
>hasn't read literary criticism

[Anonymous No.10170571]

I think you're too stupid for philosophy. Maybe smart enough to take down observations in a laboratory, though. I suggest never reading a book again.

[Anonymous No.10170597]

dumb frogposter triggering /lit/ whith his chad /sci/ mee mees

[Anonymous No.10170599]

>>10170571
philosophy is riddled with unfalsified BS like methaphysics, is just mental masturbation that is glorified because brainlets think 2k years of circlejerk is amazing.

kys

[Anonymous No.10170601]

>>10170599
Again, I think you're too stupid for philosophy, that or a troll.

[Anonymous No.10170608]

>>10170601
philosophy is a pseudoscience for pseuds.

[Anonymous No.10170631]

>>10170608
How can it be a pseudoscience? It doesn't claim to be inherently scientific. In fact more recent schools have explicitly distanced themselves from science.

[Anonymous No.10170639]

>>10170538
>when you think everything has to have a logical explaination
Whats the universe,again?

[Anonymous No.10170654]

>>10170631
then is not diferent from a made up system of beliefs like religion or fantasy.

at least math tries everything to function acording to logic.

without evidence is not diferent from made up BS like scientology.

[Anonymous No.10170665]

>>10170654
what is logic?

[Anonymous No.10170681]

>>10170608
Lol science is actually a pseudo-philosophy

[Anonymous No.10170692]

>>10170538
>hates philosophy
>believes empiricism

Check em