[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 50 KB, 640x480, martin-heidegger-l.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10057010 No.10057010 [Reply] [Original]

Did he close the hermeneutic circle?

>> No.10057028

is this a math thread?

>> No.10057032

The point of the cycle isn't the beginning or end of it, but the time spend within it, and the expreience derived therefrom.

>> No.10057037
File: 315 KB, 500x475, 1501193127816.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10057037

>tfw heidegger reinterpreted total reality taoism and zen in the most boring way possible so it wouldn't count as religion
this is why the west can't have nice things

>> No.10057057
File: 85 KB, 564x762, e44f290a6508e17ef8d493863c3223b1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10057057

>>10057037
>tfw Heidegger actually took us beyond Being in a way no Eastern esotericism could

>> No.10057065

>>10057057
looks like that normie meme of the guy looking at another girl's ass and the girlfriend angry but without the girlfriend

>> No.10057079

>>10057057
only he didn't

>> No.10057085

>>10057057
What's with that face? Is that sheets of LSD he's carrying?

>> No.10057096
File: 19 KB, 674x432, 7ae.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10057096

>>10057010
I know it's a b8 question, but come on....

also
>>10057037
>'heidegger reinterpreted 'total reality' from eastern religion'
>>10057057
>'Heidegger took us BEYOND Being'
(dis nigga literally said BEYOND Being)

why are u guys so stupid and uninformed? Know I remember why I swore off /lit/.

>> No.10057100

>>10057096
*Now

>> No.10057103

>>10057096
In my defense, total reality is the accepted translation of the Quanzhen sect.
And I am quite heavily intoxicated.

>> No.10057141

didnt schiller end heidegger also heidegger is a manlet

>> No.10057158

>>10057141
kant was like 4', explains why he couldn't reach the things in itself

>> No.10057420

>>10057158
kek
#fuckkant

>> No.10058170

>>10057096
>makes fun of the idea of "BEYOND Being"

>Hasn't read Plotinus

>> No.10058499

>>10057057
that could actually be true, please elaborate

>> No.10058502

>>10057032
so it's closed isn't it

>> No.10058511

>>10058170
There is no such thing as beyond being. All the actions you take in your day to day life, conscious or not, is part of being.

>> No.10058566
File: 89 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10058566

>>10057010
He couldn't even complete the system of German Idealism, how do you think he'd solve the hermeneutic circle?

>> No.10058582

>>10058170
I have read fucking Plotinus, you idiot. The whole heideggerian project is to rid thinking of that sort of ontotheology that Plotinus is a prime example of. Are you incapable of reading statements in their context? Or maybe you just have no clue about Heidegger?

>>10057103
doesn't change the fact that it is extremely reductionistic and highly problematic to say that Heidegger's thought is simply and just a 'revision' of eastern thinking; especially given that his interest in the east came rather late in his life/career, and that their is no scholarly consensus on the relationship of his thinking to this interest.

>> No.10058596

>>10058582
*there

>> No.10058613

>>10057010
>>10058566
Isn't Heidegger's point, crudely stated, that there is no closing of the system (Hegel), no absolute knowledge; the circle remains open?