[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 79 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault (2).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9821411 No.9821411 [Reply] [Original]

Why would Greg Sadler agree to this?

https://youtu.be/myNOxWnAr3A?list=PLL7wqBX30gIQXC26hESyL47cOwW_ZrYSK

>> No.9821489

>>9821411
Maybe Sadler is the man you thought he was. Find another /lit/daddy

>> No.9821494

>>9821411
>Why would Greg Sadler agree to this?
2socratic4u

>> No.9821542
File: 14 KB, 483x82, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9821542

>first comment

it's becoming increasingly difficult to find the will to live

>> No.9821603

>>9821542
Nothing wrong with Jordan. You are trying too hard to fit in with the /lit/ pseud clique. Fuck off.

>> No.9821691

>>9821603
>Nothing wrong with Jordan
>the /lit/ pseud clique

Congratulations, you are in it!

>> No.9821693

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVJQHbQSjmc

>> No.9821701

>>9821691
Stay contrarian, faggot.

>> No.9822206

Dr. Sadler rules. His YouTube channel is so wonderful and is underappreciated considering the attention Dr. Peterson.

>> No.9822229

>>9821693
>advertising, authenticity on youtube, and unsolicited reviews
How much are Plato, Aristotle and Epictetus making out of Sadler's interview?

>> No.9822347

>>9821542
He literally is getting Jordan Peterson on.

>> No.9822356

>>9821701
No, anon, you are the contrarian.

>> No.9822359

>>9822229
>implying undying fame is not the sole aim of any decent philosopher

>> No.9822364
File: 74 KB, 600x849, doge_of_venice.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9822364

>>9822347
Why do you guys give that big of a fuck about him?

You know better than I that he's going to recommend books by Nietzsche, Jung and Dostoyevsky, or something along the line from the usual suspects, all of them authors who are not entirely foreign to /lit/ and the frequent recommendations thereof.

What's the fuss even all about?

>> No.9822371

>>9822364
He reminds us of ourselves. We hate him.

>> No.9822373

>>9821411
WHEN MEMES COLLIDE

>> No.9822457

>>9821411
Greg is super easy to flatter, so he's a bit naive navigating these things. And he's a pretty good guy who would do a good amount of work/appearances for free just to get philosophy out there. I know this cause I've met him and I may have been the one that tipped him off when Cliff mentioned him once.

It's a good video though cause Cliff's complete ineptitude at podcast conversation made the whole thing like an extended Sadler vlog.

>> No.9823564

>>9822373
We need a podcast between Sadler and Peterson.

>> No.9824740
File: 141 KB, 593x486, Screen Shot 2017-07-29 at 10.54.09 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9824740

>>9821542
average BTF fan here

>Gets called a retard for arguing that corn father is always right.
>Whips out his thesaurus and spends 2 hours coming up with this masterpiece in response

>> No.9824765

>>9824740

> tfw there are like two or three sentences in there that I agree with that is undermined by how freshman the rest is

>> No.9824786

>>9822371
>We.

>> No.9824792
File: 620 KB, 1270x1093, cliff_is_cool_as_fuck.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9824792

>>9821542

>> No.9826057

>>9822457
>I may have been the one that tipped him off when Cliff mentioned him once.

>> No.9827144

>>9822364
He's a charlatan when talking about anything outside of his field and gets paid who knows how many thousands a month now for it.

>> No.9827170

>>9822364
once he realized a lot of his fans sympathize with MGTOW he pack peddled. Really shows where his interests are and It's not honesty or integrity.

>> No.9828009

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRfGJAuuOl8

>> No.9828059

>>9827144
Jung is his field
>>9827170
>where his interests are
getting paid to educate people into living slightly less shitty lives, an objective for which he doesn't perceive MGTOW to be a viable solution?
>peddled

Still didn't answer the question:
>Why do you guys give that big of a fuck about him?
Why do you concern yourself with him? Why?

>>9828009
2socratic4u

>> No.9828146
File: 334 KB, 2048x1290, 1491249253195.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9828146

Reminder most of these people are paid to impress you, nothing more. Some are paid far more than others mind you.

>> No.9828163

>>9828146
Buckley, Chomsky, Hitchens, Degrasse Tyson, Dawkins, Zizek, Bloom, Self, and Land are credible intellectuals though. Especially Bloom.

>> No.9828183

>>9828163
Why don't you get information first hand rather than from some garbage collector?

>> No.9828217

>>9828183
Because it's interesting to read others' opinions, because I can acknowledge some people are smarter and better educated than me, because I understand someone whose job it is to know a field and who has access to the best resources available could say more on that field that I could.

>> No.9828257

>>9828146

I don't feel that the great comic George Carlin belongs on such a list, the man was a master of the humor craft, and beige is a top lad, likewise William F Buckley is the definition of an intellectual, there wasn't any facade to him, now on the other hand, his contemporary gore vidal certainly could take his place on this list

>> No.9828271
File: 14 KB, 680x489, 1425932556589.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9828271

>>9828217
>because I can acknowledge some people are smarter and better educated than me

How spooky.

>> No.9828353

>>9828146
Leave Sadler alone man he just wants to make videos about Hegel and give free talks

>> No.9828523

>>9828271
intelligence is not a spook

>> No.9828747

>>9828523
Maybe not but that poster obviously has respect for other men, and that is very spooky.

>> No.9828779

>>9828747
mem

>> No.9828790

>>9828257
I love Vidal, but it's true that fame was his #1 goal and that he was not a real public intellectual, all posturing. he's no different than Capote, both were ladder climbing queens.

>> No.9828853

>>9822356
t. contrarian