/lit/ - Literature

>>9708685
here we go

>>9708676

Go away sargon of akkad.

Nobody gave it any thought. The word 'racist' didn't exist in the English lexicon until the early 20th century.

>>9708676
Look up "world IQ chart"

THEN look up the genetic heritability of IQ

Combine those facts in your lil noggin' and you've got yourself an answer

>>9708874

Look up the flynn study about the white iq in 1900

there is literally nothing wrong with racism. it is not actually the origin of all evil in the world, contrary to what you were taught in public school.

>>9708904
This. Everybody is racist and sexist to some degree. It's just a part of the human condition.

>Almost everyone unites in declaring 'racism' false and detestable. Yet absolutely everyone knows it is true.

>>9708874
>IQ

>>9708676
Good thread. Nice entry level question, ignores the rest of the planet, maymay image, very nice, very nice.
I can contribute to a shit thread with some epic intellectual bait too.

>>9708676
How did many enlightenment thinkers justify their racism and why were so many European intellectuals at this time racist?
Do you consider humans to be atomic entities in nature, or do you view ontologies to be false abstracts motivated by human perception?

Sage.

>>9708676

>>9709327
>not blaming the first Nicean council
pleb

>>9709340
I blame Constantine

>>9709327
breadpilled af

>>9709327
>>9709340
>>9709355
>not blaming Socrates & Plato

>>9709449
>>9709355
>>9709340
>>9709327
>not blaming the development of agricultural civilization

>>9709449
>not blaming Adam & Eve

>>9709829
>not blaming the big bang

>buhuu how dare cultures and peoples find themselves superior and dislike other cultures and peoples

>>9708895
>the environment has some influence on IQ, so obviously genetics and biology are totally irrelevant

>>9709327
>not blaming consciousness

>>9708676
I didn't realize prager u had a facebook meme page

>>9708676

>he doesn't know every conflict on earth originated on the centralization of power
>mfw

>>9712029
>not knowing conflicts aren't the problem

>>9708676
you talk like it is this given that people should think that preference for their own people and ways is this terrible, immoral thing without any sense or cultural or societal benefits.

why do people who have adopted these arbitrary values of like just the last 30 or so years so thoughtlessly presume that they have the end-all, master-key knowledge and ethics?

I'm not saying "racism" is good, I'm saying more that it's a non-issue. people preferring their own is simply law-of-nature status. like attracts like. you prefer what you are.

>>9709481
Actually agricultural civilization is when the bad turned to good, as in religion that came with morals. Now with "progressivism" we are just turning back to our animal like state.