[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 274 KB, 1131x1600, 1486093736937.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9476075 No.9476075 [Reply] [Original]

when you're writing what do you do in this situation?

>a STD
>an STD

because S is spelled 'ess' which is a vowel?

>> No.9476080

bump

>> No.9476084

S is no vowel. therefore it's "a STD"

>> No.9476090

>>9476075
An. Go with the sound of the word or the acronym considering how it's pronounced.

An hour. A history. Same letter but dependent on the sound. Why not google this?

>> No.9476094

Always go by pronunciation. It's 'an STD'.

>> No.9476101
File: 28 KB, 640x360, 1477724085628.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9476101

>>9476090
>>9476094
I don't have enough phone data to load google sorry and thanks

>> No.9476102

An STD for dialogue, a STD for third person narration (though I wouldn't use acronyms there anyway).

>> No.9476103

>>9476084
The rule doesn't consider the letter but rather the sound.

An honest man. A honest man. Which one reads like it's written by someone that doesn't understand English? Say it aloud and you'll almost always find the right answer.

>> No.9476117

>>9476102
I wouldn't go by that rule. The funny thing with acronyms is they can be pronounced arbitrarily. So we say each letter of STD. JPEG is pronounced Jay-peg, NATO is nay-toe. Go with the sound and don't be inconsistent. Changing from dialogue and third person for a and an is a bad idea imo that would confuse myself and many other readers.

>> No.9476125

>>9476084
u is a vowel, therefore it's "an university"

>> No.9476141

>>9476125
No. Stop posting this troll crap. The sound of the word is used not the actual letter. Idk why I'm even responding...

>> No.9476150

>>9476141
I was juat pointing out how stupid the statement in >>9476084 is.

>> No.9476168
File: 54 KB, 580x324, IMG_0188.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9476168

>>9476150
When I reread your post I realized that was probably the case. Have a fun day, anon : ^)

>> No.9476175

>>9476168
I think you forgot to sage my thread this time.