[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 308 KB, 570x429, IMG_0763.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9444641 No.9444641[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Where does /lit/ get their news, politics, and book reviews?

>> No.9444646

>>9444641
wsj

>> No.9444648

I overhear my family play CNN and FOX all day.

>> No.9444652

>>9444641
Trump's twitter

>> No.9444660

>>9444652
This.

If he wasn't a reliable source, he wouldn't be president

>> No.9444663

>>9444646
The guardian and New York Times

>> No.9444670
File: 21 KB, 508x504, Communist cat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9444670

>>9444641
Lately Jimmy Dore Show

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZivWRD3wkk
Most reliable name in news

>> No.9444710

>>9444641
Generally I get my news from the Economist, recognizing that it's a left leaning libertarian publication, which is probably most in line with my views in general, although I certainly disagree with some of their views.

I rarely watch TV news, but when I do I tune into my local station. Local news programs are generally pretty unbiased.

Obviously the cable stations are trash and a tier below that is like HuffPo and Breitbart.

>> No.9444720

I don't follow the news because it's mostly "news". There aren't actually dozens of important events happening every day. The only drawback to not following what is in the news is that people consider me to be uninformed or out of the loop, which isn't so bad.

>> No.9444721

>>9444720
and I get my book reviews from pbs btw

>> No.9444724

For me its 8/pol/.

>> No.9444753

I don't engage in politics. Huge waste of time and energy.

>> No.9444774

>>9444710
>left leaning libertarian publication
they seem pretty center-right

>> No.9444778

>news
Wikipedia

>politics
I don't really follow politics; for major political developments see above

>book reviews
I don't read books reviews

>> No.9444779
File: 114 KB, 720x960, 161.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9444779

>>9444753
This of course is a political position

>> No.9444811

>>9444779
>This of course is a political position
Explain

>> No.9444818

>>9444779
Hurr durr 'there is no absolute truth' is an absolute truth!

>> No.9444842

>>9444811
Passive inaction does not make an absence of reactions.

Death can be, but only if people don't remember you.

>> No.9444990

>>9444842
>Passive inaction does not make an absence of reactions
But how is an indifference to politics itself a political statement

>> No.9445039

>>9444641

4chan, fox news, leninology.blogspot.com (it's so much fun to see him lose the game of life, and get an alternative view), nationalreview.com (it's fun to check in with a cuckservative site which was permanently rendered irrelevant a few months ago),

>> No.9445043

News: Breitbart
Politics: Info Wars
Book reviews: Anthony Fantano

>> No.9445047

Commentary Magazine

>> No.9445135

The Real News Network.
Truthout
The Intercept
Also, Chomsky rightfully argues that you get an unvarnished look at the neoliberal consensus when you read the business press: WSJ; theFinancial Times; the Economist

>> No.9445198
File: 3.09 MB, 3072x2304, Cache_River_in_Woodruff_County,_AR_002.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9445198

>>9444641
wsj, the guardian

>> No.9445229

>>9444753
>LOOK AT ME I'M A CENTRIST IM SO ABOVE IT ALL. LIKE, IT DOESN'T EVEN MATTER WHO YOU VOTE FOR ITS ALL THE SAME THING.

>> No.9445253

>>9444774
They are to everyone in the world except Americans, where the Democrats (center-right) are called the left and the Republicans (far-right) are called the right.

>> No.9445257

The People's Daily, where else?

>> No.9445609

>>9444774
The Economist is definitely left of the dial on social issues. And they abhor populism (both left wing populism and right wing populism). In general they are what the alt-right/rightie populists would call "Globalists"--being that they are firm advocates of free markets and free trade. All the internet Alt Knights like Paul Joseph Watson loathe the Economist.

The Economist hates Trump but they do agree with him to an extent on deregulation.

>> No.9445614

>>9445229
Not that guy, but being politically apathetic/apolitical is not the same as being a centerist.

>> No.9445615

>>9445229
I bet he'll live 20 years longer than you

>> No.9445624

>>9444641
/pol/

>> No.9445652

>>9444641
>reading book reviews
what for?
and besides that i have not ever needed someone elses opinion to without fail only buy and read things that are good

>news
all over the internet desu
never trust any single source

>politics
i don't get my "Politics" from anywhere because that is an absolutely retarded concept

>> No.9445676
File: 81 KB, 639x785, Human nature intensifies.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9445676

>>9444641

I'll well enough in tune with the current Zeitgeist that I don't need a single source as such. The experiences I have on any given day, alongside the occasional bits of news/etc I encounter by chance, permit me to have a finger on the pulse of politics and the spirit of society at large. This results in a sort of 'gut feeling' or 'instinct' as to how things will go, and it has yet to be proven wrong.

Other benefits include becoming anti-political/economical, which is liberating.

>> No.9445685

>>9445676

This guy gets it.

>> No.9445691

>>9445676

This is literally 99% of Humanity, moron.

>I don't need a single source as such

You and everyone else, genius.

Your "gut feeling"/"instinct" isn't worth shit.

>> No.9445797

New Criterion is /lit/ approved

>> No.9445800

>>9444648
>CNN -and- FOX

Weird.

>> No.9445810

Local papers, (irish) Sunday Independent, though it's really awful I only read it because my parents get it. Otherwise I just use Google but if I'm ever interested in a story I will research different sources

>> No.9445867

>>9445043
he does book reviews ?

>> No.9445868

>>9444641
Book reviews from "books better than food", unironically. He got me to read bolano and borges

>> No.9445927

Huffington Post
Salon.com
Buzzfeed

>> No.9445987

>>9444641
salvage.zone

>> No.9445990

>>9444990
Implies the current state of politics is OK and doesn't need to be engaged with/against

>> No.9446092

Books: TLS, Spectator
News/Politics: Spectator - with 6 months delay
New Yorker too, but it is going downhill

>> No.9446120

>>9444641
>news
/pol/
>politics
/pol/

I don't read book reviews

>> No.9446531

>>9444641

4chan for all 3 of them