/lit/ - Literature

simply epic

>>9286510
A biographical approach is probably easiest. His early work in the UK and the NRx stuff that he currently writes have a lot of contradictions. Any attempt to capture both in a purely theoretical framework is probably going to fall short and be confusing.

How does he feel about the anti-intellectual alt right to appropriate the dark enlightenment?

He's a repressed transgender woman, who chickened out from transitioning and then went rabid and rightwing to cloud his thoughts from himself.

That's why he founded both xenofeminism (left accelx) and the dark enlightenment (right accelx).

>>9286519
judging from his cryptic comments on his site and twitter, I'd guess he judges them much the same as the academic left- as useful idiots perpetuating Meltdown.

>>9286510
I wonder what he thinks of Disney Land

>>9286570
nah he seems to get pretty annoyed about that actually. he makes a lot of effort to try to clarify that these people are not NRx, bc he wants the NRx brand to stay pure and Moldbuggian

>>9286610
A lot of my interpretation of "useful idiots" comes from this short essay about a hypothetical post-democratic america.

http://www.xenosystems.net/trichotomocracy/

>>9286548

while that's an entertaining notion its wrong, xenofem was started by six women collectively named Labora Cuboniks who branched from the early 2000s tech collective Autistici Inventati who were probably inspired by the ccru

>>9286639
>>9286570
I think there's a difference between useful idiots and appropriation of thought
You can throw the useful idiots in front of the bus

>merrp

>>9286511
>>9286514
>>9286519
>>9286548
>>9286570
>>9286588
>>9286610
>>9286639
>>9286668
>>9286905
>>9286922
thank you guys, I love you so much