[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 243 KB, 1920x1080, Technocratic Communism Flag.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9261514 No.9261514 [Reply] [Original]

What books describe an economy and/or a social structure of communism and technocracy?

Also, does this idea appeal to you? Do you even know what technocracy is?

>> No.9261520

I dunno
No
Yes.

>> No.9261533

>>9261520
Honest answer.

>> No.9261540

>>9261514
Its not so much communism as nihilism, but A Question Concerning Technology by Martin Heidegger would be a good starting point.

>> No.9261633

>>9261540
Heidegger is apparently talking about the essence of technology and what stems from it, so far what I've read. Is not the bureaucratic management I expected but is a interesting topic.

Thanks,

>> No.9261820

>>9261514
Collectivism is not compatible with a technocratic society. A technocracy is what we are moving towards in the USA, it resembles a plutocracy but I believe that is only because we have a capitalist mode of production.

>> No.9261847
File: 92 KB, 400x400, Reddit_Armie.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9261847

>>9261514
>communism and technocracy

>> No.9261855

>>9261514
8ch dot net/ leftypol/res/1477348.html

>> No.9261884

>>9261514
>Do you even know what technocracy is?
There is no need to invent superfluous words, the proper term for what you're proposing is "oligarchy".

>> No.9261886

>>9261820
The modern view of technocracy encloses only bankers in government positions, original technocracy had nothing to do with that. In fact, original technocracy proposed to eliminate the price system and change the economic paradigm from the root as to shake the ground of traditional economists.

Again, television has distorted reality.

>> No.9261889

>>9261514
>Do you even know what technocracy is?

wow, piss off, faggot.

>> No.9261902

Hold on a second there kiddo. You thought of something you think it's cool "communism + technocracy" and then you come here and ask "are there any books on this cool thing I just thought about?"

Things don't roll like that. First things first. Read Marx's Capital. That's it. After you finish it, come here and ask it again if the question still makes sense.

>> No.9261908

>>9261886
Indeed, sometimes /lit/ has quite braindead people.

>> No.9261916

>>9261886
>The modern view of technocracy encloses only bankers in government positions
No, No it doesn't, I can't fathom where you've picked up this idea.

>> No.9261926

>>9261916
Tell me then, what is the modern view of technocracy.

>> No.9261935

>>9261902
Stalinism is closer to technocracy than you think.

>> No.9261957

>>9261926
Not OP but most believe in the equally retarded idea that "programmers should be in charge" and a return to enlightenment left-empiricism..

>> No.9261968

>>9261957
So we switch from a dictatorship of the proletariat to a dictatorship of the technicians? I find that hard to implement.

Interesting, but hard.

>> No.9261989

>>9261935
*Maoism