[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 11 KB, 490x148, lit2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9098358 No.9098358 [Reply] [Original]

reddit is making fun of us

>> No.9098365

>>9098358
Context?
Link?

>> No.9098368

I'm just happy to be noticed desu

>> No.9098385

>Being made fun of for knowing things
Fucking reddit

>> No.9098391

>>9098385
lmao that's what I was going to say.

"ohhh heeyyy we got a smarty pants over here. fuck off back to /lit Einstein.

>> No.9098407

God forbid somebody knows things

>> No.9098447
File: 525 KB, 1815x887, 1485069308151.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9098447

My guess is that someone from re.ddit came to /lit/ and said something fucking stupid, and was told to "go back to red.dit." Now that he is back on his turf, he takes glee in telling pretentious pseuds to " go back to /lit/."

>> No.9098450

>>9098358
Making fun of themselves, you mean. There's hardly anyone left here who isn't a closet plebbitor.

>> No.9098491

>>9098447
>that pic
Have you ever had a gf anon?

>> No.9098502

>>9098491
normies get out

>> No.9098513

>>9098365
>>9098368
>>9098385
>>9098358
>>9098407
>>9098447
>>9098450
>>9098491

'Hegelian dialectic' is something /pol/ says to denote some grand Jewish conspiracy. I'm serious.

Search 'hegelian dialectic' in the /pol/ archive. /pol/ and reddit are fucking retards

>> No.9098514

>>9098358
>its another faggot proudly exposes himself as a reddit cross-poster episode

*le epic sigh*

>> No.9098527

>>9098491
Not him but is it bad if I've had sex a handful of times but have never been in a long term relationship at 25?

>> No.9098541

>>9098513
Just did
http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/hegelian%20dialectic/

What the fuck is wrong with this board?

>> No.9098549

>>9098541
hahahaha that's great

>> No.9098554

>>9098502
I never did either

>> No.9098561

>>9098541
Sometimes I feel compelled to educate /pol/ at least a little, given how they've memed themselves into cultural relevance.

>> No.9098565

>>9098541
What on Earth? How did this happen?

>> No.9098611

>>9098491
It's not mine, found it on r9k

>> No.9098619

>>9098611
So I guess the answer is no

>> No.9098623
File: 463 KB, 2108x1360, Screen Shot 2017-02-13 at 3.08.29 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9098623

>>9098358
>posts nonstop in /r/politics

OP, care to kys

>> No.9098631

>>9098527
Depends. Do you want long term relationships? Do you hope to get married someday? If so, yes, it's a problem, and you should look at whatever you're doing and change fast.

If not, whatever, keep fucking randos

>> No.9098637

>>9098561
>tfw the /pol/itically incorrect ideology becomes the /pol/itically correct thing to believe in the US

>> No.9098781

>>9098561
what are the main things you think they are wrong about?

>> No.9098791

>>9098619
Actually the answer is yes ;)

>> No.9098792

>>9098561
They wouldn't want it. They're explicitly anti-intellectual.

>> No.9098826

>>9098792
I'd just say they're just anti-leftist intellectuals, which isn't necessarily bad. That said, I saw a post on there calling Lolita "pedophilic kikery" today, so I'm not prepared to defend my point too passionately.

>> No.9098832

>>9098826
don't argue for a thesis you know is wrong when it's clearly indefensible, it doesn't further the conversation

>> No.9098833
File: 386 KB, 667x670, whynot.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9098833

>>9098358
>the reply has a delete option

>> No.9098844

>>9098833
You mean... OP was the one who did this? How could he?

>> No.9098865

>>9098781
they have demonstrated constantly that they don't understand very basic things about history, statistics, philosophy, public policy and any number of other issues.

They live in a separate reality that in very few way represents our own and arguing them is like arguing with a wall.

Do you know how many times I've attempted to explain what multicolinearity is to them, or how over I've had to break out the quotes from OKH officers about how awful a leader and tactician Hitler was?

>> No.9098880

>>9098833
with a heavy heart i regret to inform you that OP is still a faggot

>> No.9098903

>>9098833
oh goodness

>> No.9098915
File: 214 KB, 400x399, 1452607247355.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9098915

>>9098833
>mfw

>> No.9098945

>>9098623
>Being anti-Trump.

Fuck off of /lit/ OP.

>> No.9098957

>>9098945
having ventured out from your home board, /pol/, a few months ago doesn't make you /lit/, fuck off

>> No.9098980

Lamont cranston, you traitor. Short haired hotty loving traitor

>> No.9099045

>>9098792
>>9098826

Pol is smarter than lit.. well I guess smarter is a tough term... more aware. though that is tough too.. Pol actually cares about the state of the world, their nations well being. Lit just wants to wrap up in blankets and bury their head in fantasy

>> No.9099053

>>9098865
interesting, any more specific examples. The hitler one is easy, I think many of them might agree, and hindsight is 20/20... it may not be easy to project such a thing, but was it possible for him to win/succeed the 'war' at all?

I would disagree about the awful leader part.

>> No.9099064
File: 496 KB, 200x178, laughingatyou.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9099064

>>9098826
>/pol/
>intellectuals

>> No.9099068

>>9099045
please go back to /pol/, please

>> No.9099069

>>9099045
Holy...

>> No.9099075

>>9098358
HAHA I AM AWARE OF THE EXISTENCE OF /LIT/ AS WELL. *UPVOTES* *SIPS TEA* *DOWNVOTES THE PESRON ABOVE WHO EVERYONE ELSE DOWNVOTED TOO* *GREENTEXTS ON REDDIT, YOUTUBE, AND TWITTER*

>> No.9099082
File: 27 KB, 330x177, 1477090203577.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9099082

>>9099045
you

have

to

go

back

>>>>/pol/

>> No.9099094
File: 3.03 MB, 359x202, 1474412817400.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9099094

>>9099045
>