[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 537 KB, 732x743, dfw cringe2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8911312 No.8911312 [Reply] [Original]

/LIT/'s TOP BOOKS 2016 WHEN?!?!!?!?!?!

>> No.8911315
File: 3.05 MB, 1820x4352, top1002k16.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8911315

>>8911312

>> No.8911394

>>8911315
>voters gave a list of 5 books
86% of respondents said Ulysses did NOT belong in even the top 5 let alone #1

>> No.8911405

>>8911394
When voters give any less you end up with books vying for 60+ spots with 1 or 2 votes to them.

>> No.8911411

>>8911405
We need a complete overhaul of the voting system with a nomination process and some form of runoff voting.

>> No.8911414

>>8911312
Anyone have that DFW Pepe saved?

>> No.8911444

>not top books that were released in 2016

>> No.8911890

>Hamlet that low
Up your game guys

>> No.8911892
File: 307 KB, 292x551, oh boy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8911892

>>8911312

>Post-1900 literature
>Worth a shit

>> No.8911951

Shouldn't it be top books 2017?

>> No.8911952

>>8911892
triggered

>> No.8911956

>>8911444
Would be genuinely interested in this list. Much more interesting than just another reshuffle of the meme classics.

>> No.8912092

>>8911892
What do you actually believe anon?

>> No.8912096

>>8911890
Hamlet's not even a book.

>> No.8912102

>>8911892
>post-1960
fix'd that for you

>> No.8912108

>>8911892
>I'm too stupid to understand anything but heavy handed Victorian themes