[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 7 KB, 316x202, 8a4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8712930 No.8712930 [Reply] [Original]

>had had

>> No.8712999
File: 43 KB, 900x900, pepe 6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8712999

>>8712930
>onimatopoeia
>songs with pages of verses
>arse
>' ' instead of " "

>> No.8713022
File: 53 KB, 600x600, 1478592205728.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8713022

>>8712930
There is a UN paper on 4chan and the influence of /pol/ on world politics.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.03452v1.pdf

I feel like this isn't even reality when /pol/ actually is influencing the media and the UN had to do research on 4chan and /pol/.

>> No.8713132
File: 35 KB, 404x282, tapping-pencil.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8713132

>>8712930
>that that

>> No.8713148

>ne'er

>> No.8713161
File: 118 KB, 807x500, 47616219_p30.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8713161

>>8712930
>done did

>> No.8713287

>>8713022
They share their rarest Pepes at the end...
PRAISE KEK, HE WHO CAPTURES ALL MINDS

>> No.8713302

>>8713022
I don't see "UN" anywhere in there

>> No.8713307

>>8712930
>He had had enough

>> No.8713319

>>8712930
>must needs

Either one is enough. Who the hell came up with this retarded expression?

>> No.8713340
File: 8 KB, 228x221, index.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8713340

>past tense

>> No.8713346

>and

>> No.8713372

>>8712930
>"Dumb frogposters, shitting up the place." He said. He'd had enough of their bullshit.
>he'd had
>he had had

>> No.8714676

i'm going to write about a guy named Had who is in a relationship with a woman, also named Had. so i can say "Had had had Had."

>> No.8714689
File: 235 KB, 745x1500, kuusi.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>> No.8714698

>>8713022
this scholarly article
>Figure 31: An (unfortunately) ultra rare Pepe eating a delicious Publix Deli
Sub Sandwich.

>> No.8714919
File: 16 KB, 664x603, FB_IMG_1475765732333.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher

>> No.8714953
File: 18 KB, 250x252, 1349762734397.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>8713022

>while American’s dominate the conversation on
/pol/
>American's
>'s

Did they even proofread this shit? I guess Jeremy Blackburn called in sick that day.

>> No.8714957

>>8712930

Go back to r9k where they don't repeat

>> No.8714963

>>8714919
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo

>> No.8714967 [DELETED] 

Is this grammatically correct?:

"Clinton won majority of votes in the smartest states."

Please correct the statement if needed.

>> No.8714973

>>8714967
simple, direct, accurate
just like Bernie

>> No.8714980

>>8714967
a majority

>> No.8714982

>>8714973
Thanks buddy.

>> No.8714984

>>8714967
"Clinton won the majority of votes."

>> No.8714985

>>8714980
Ah, thanks.

>> No.8714989 [DELETED] 

>>8714984
I can include "in the smartest states," right? Because I want to emphasize it.

>> No.8714992

>Fish fish fish fish fish

>> No.8714993

>>8714989
yeah, but put especially

>> No.8714996 [DELETED] 

>>8714984
Also bit confused with "in the smartest states or from the smartest states."

>> No.8714998

>>8714996
In

>> No.8715003

>>8714993
All right, mate.

>> No.8715007

>>8714998
Thanks mate. Totally appreciated

>> No.8715451

>>8713340
Depends on the context

>> No.8715466

>>8713022
This isn't a UN paper, and written by some random CS students. You could write something like this if you wanted to.

>> No.8715472

>>8712930
How else would you use past perfect with the verb to have?

He had had the same pencil for three years.

It'S not like past progressive where he could still have the pencil, no he had it and will never have it again. Perfect grammar.

>> No.8715519
File: 29 KB, 613x556, IMG_4760.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>James, while John had had "had", had had "had had"; "had had" had had a better effect on the teacher.

>> No.8715526

>>8715519
Can /lit/ figure it out?

>> No.8715920

>>8713161
Gone git

>> No.8715931

>>8715526
figure what out? The sentence might have a lot of hads in it, but it's not difficult to understand. The two used different phrases, one had and one had had in a test or an essay or what not, and James got more approval from the teacher.

not much to be figured out

>> No.8716083
File: 36 KB, 223x349, and_ching_chong_to_you.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8716083

>>8715519

>> No.8716389

>>8713161
DINDU

>> No.8717562

>>8715466
They received UN funding.

>> No.8717675

>>8712930
How else are you going to form the pluperfect of "to have" ?

>> No.8717679

>>8712930
Fuck off you illiterate retard. I'll write had had had when the rules of grammar bind me to do so and there's nothing you can do about it.

>> No.8717766

>>8712930
>had had
Matthew Marcus thought to himself: "Why am I feeling so weird right now?". (How 'bout that perfect punctuation?) By this time, he had been fired, he had been stung by a bee, and he had had his first kiss. It was a roller coaster of a day! :^)

>> No.8717769

>>8714963
I never understood this one. Is it supposed to be
[Buffalo the animal] [trick or fool] [Buffalo the city] [Buffalo the animal]... and then what?

>> No.8717781

>>8717766
>?".
Is not perfect punctuation, it is just wrong, there should only be one stop at the end of a sentence.
>(How 'bout
Is also wrong, you shouldn't use parentheses like this.
>thought to himself:
>By this time,
Second needs the colon more than the first.
>he had had
Perhaps the least wrong part but simply a supremely awkward way to jam that construction in.

>> No.8717830

>>8717781
Updated

"Lil' early fer a beer, but what the hayll?" By 3 o'clock, Johnnie Boy had had a colonoscopy, an ice cream, and a fender bender.

>> No.8717839
File: 24 KB, 324x324, custom_message_gold_star_with_gold_glitter_texture_star_sticker-r8c6018b4e6f64bd4b7386ba858eb00be_v9w09_8byvr_324.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8717839

>>8717830
Much better

>> No.8717858

>>8717839
:)

>>8717769
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo_Buffalo_buffalo_buffalo_buffalo_Buffalo_buffalo
Chicago dogs, [that] Chicago dogs bully, bully Chicago dogs.
Pretty nonsensical, but it's for fun!

>> No.8717919

>mfw "had had had had" is OK English grammar

>> No.8719309

>>8712930
"He had had enough of the had meme"

>> No.8719332

>>8714689
How in the fuck?