[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 73 KB, 486x751, 00022.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8702936 No.8702936 [Reply] [Original]

The fuck happened to the Hunter S. Thompson thread?

Here, recreated:
Given his hatred for Tricky Dicky, what would Hunter S Thompson have thought of Crooked Hillary?

I think Matt Taibi's introduction for the 2011 edition of Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Train '72 makes it kinda clear:
>Campaign Trail today is a different story than it was in Hunter’s time. It was possible in the era of Vietnam and Watergate to believe in a simple narrative of a good candidate versus a bad one, and Hunter’s gushing endorsement of the antiwar Democratic challenger in Campaign Trail ’72 made perfect narrative sense in the context of the times. Decades later, corporate money so completely dominates both parties, and the oligopoly of billionaire interests that operates outside the two-party system is so powerful in itself, that a book-length narrative of good-guy Democrats versus bad-guy Republicans would seem trite and hopelessly naive if it were tried today, in the age of Occupy and the Tea Party. (...) the campaign today is the same story it was back then: a string of doddering dunces trotted out by rich and powerful people to sell the general public on the same generally cruel and moronic policies that guided the American empire forty years ago. The electoral salesmanship involved in making voters think they chose those principles is more elaborate now, but it’s basically the same scam and Thompson’s take on it would be the same as it was in 1972.

>> No.8702951

>>8702936
This is the thread that died prematurely, by the way: >>8700101

It was on the first page when it died, so it wasn't from natural causes. Beware.

>> No.8703020

That was a pretty decent thread, too. What the fuck

>> No.8703081

WTF I hate mods now!

>> No.8703090
File: 28 KB, 650x366, le smoking drinking anti-theist.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8703090

>>8702936

I don't think the mods liked it getting all /pol/itical.

Daily reminder that big Chris would vote for the Don.

>> No.8703104
File: 37 KB, 326x500, e898d9addaa2389f84c94abdcdbb86ff-d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8703104

>>8703090
>I don't think the mods liked it getting all /pol/itical.
They can eat shit. It was still a thread full of literary discussion.

>Daily reminder that big Chris would vote for the Don.
Without a doubt.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyDQxfDeWRc

Have his book on the Clintons while I'm at it:
http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=E898D9ADDAA2389F84C94ABDCDBB86FF

The Clintons' War on Women and Clinton Cash (but the former more than the latter) are really good about that subject too.

>> No.8703168

>>8702936
>Crooked Hillary
not /lit/

>> No.8703239

Both major party candidates are shit and if you think otherwise you're a cuck. /Pol/ pls go.

>> No.8703418

>>8703104
thanks scrow

>> No.8703428

>implying HST wouldn't have said fuck it and run for prez on the gonzo ticket

>> No.8703448

>>8703428
>implying he wouldn't have written his entire campaign strategy to a letter to the editor before running on the gonzo ticket, allowing his opposition to quash him like the stoner fool that he was.
Aspen '70 all over again

>> No.8703451

>>8703090
Shut the fuck up trumpcuck

>> No.8703464

>>8703448
true, but it would have been a good read at least

>> No.8703468

>>8703448
>Aspen '70 all over again
You weren't there, man, you weren't there.

>> No.8703469

>>8703468
He wrote extensively about it though.

Fear and Loathing at Rolling Stone is fantastic.