/lit/ - Literature

>>8528377
He's an atheist, why would he care about muh human beings??? Why doesn't he just fund a research to create a huge atomic bomb that can burn the whole planet in 5 minutes to end all suffering on earth? Nothing has souls after all, every living thing lives to suffer pointlessly according to people like him.

>>8528407
WHO CREATED GOD!?!??!?!!?!
Exactly.

>>8528377
That can't be a real quote, the numbers are all off.

>>8528407
Oh my God I hate Christians so much.

>>8528417
You think?

>>8528454
pls be fake

>>8528480

>>8528377
>inspirational

(Stoop) if you are abcedminded, to this claybook, what curios of sings (please stoop), in this allaphbed! Can you rede (since We and Thou had it out already) its world?

>>8528500
>Obama
>2004
Im gonna post this on pol and see how many falls for it.

>>8528377
That's not even the best Dawkins quote

>>8530078
>fall hard for le atheisme meme
>STILL consider appeals to moral as arguments
Wtf

>>8528377
Dick has emotions?

>>8528500
Feynman died in '88..

And, when you want something, all the universe conspires in helping you to achieve it.

>>8528407
>Atheists can't care about human life
Why doe?

>>8530114
>push hard for the "morality comes only from religion" meme
>STILL consider snide greentext as arguments
Wtf

>>8528407
Atheist here, the reason is time cops

>>8528407
It's this kind of thinking that shows how truly stupid religious people are.

Why care?
Because I like some people. God or not, life is the most anomalous and enigmatic thing for trillions of lightyears in any direction and the only thing moreso would be more life from elsewhere. Life is a great mystery. You don't have to play pretend you have the answers to it to enjoy it or feel empathy.

>>8528454
very high quality memeing right here

>>8530078
>mfw when he actually went out and did that

Firing a shot costs hella more energy than 5 calories. I dont know the exact amount of joules edged out by the gunpowder, but its over 5.

>>8530139
holy shit obama wasen't even born then

>>8528377
>shoot machine gun
>my body starts burning away
guns kill people guys, its scary

>>8528377
>only 5 atoms to fire a gun
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
t. /k/

>>8530686
calories are hella not the same thing as atoms

>>8528454
Josh Lyman?

>>8530139
That's why it is such a great and inspirational quote.

Oh look. It's a /lit thread for people who only read memes!

>>8528414
>>8528480
>>8530257
>>8530275
>>8530290
>being this gullible
H eh . . . he pulled ur strings, kids . . . .

>>8530290
>MUH FEELINGS

>>8530290
B E G U I L E D
E
G
U
I
L
E
D

>>8531349
black science man is reddit tier meme friend

>>8530129
underrated post

>>8530129
T.H.I.S. !

>>8528377
Empathy is for faggots.

>>8528581
>this pic
Is gender a spook?

>>8531422
I wouldn't be surprised if he actually said that.
I mean we're talking about a guy who did something like this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tIwYNioDL8

>>8532733
What the fuck? How is there 61 thousand views on that video if there are only 8 thousand people alive?

>>8532750
Are you retarded? Clearly the people who have watched that video have watched it more than once. I mean it's obvious.

>>8532733
What the fuck.
It took time and effort to animate all that shit and make the song.

>>8532733
>creates memes
>becomes one

Circle of life, myan

>>8531270
underrated post

>>8530078
Dicky Dawkins is a twitter banter legend

>>8533930
Damn

>>8533930
Damn, respect

>>8533930
wtf i love dawkins now

He can't help himself!

>>8528407
>>8528377
Please be trolling, neither of you can possibly believe that qoute to be true

>>8533930

>>8528377
>Burns atoms
Wat?

>>8534555
>>8534029
>>8533930
>>8530078
The absolute madman

>>8534724
Woah.

>>8534724
I hope this is real

>>8534029
What's the name of that political phenomenon in which liberals publicize statements they consider outrageous, assuming everybody will share their indignation, but accidentally end up promoting the statements to people who otherwise wouldn't have heard them?

>>8534869
This is one of the most nonsensical things I've ever read

>>8534913
Not him but I'd like you to elaborate.

>>8534924
Also not him, but he's literally advocating reeducation camps.

>>8534913
Ever been on /pol/?

>>8534913
He argues that natural rights can be grasped by universally everyone, including the recognition of private property and the individual's supremacy over his own body. He argues that people whose ideologies clash with natural rights and private property (democracy, communism, socialism, etc.) should be looked down as intellectually challenged people who are devoid of any rights.

But I have read this quote and I believe this specific passage is when he is specifically referring to covenants whose nature is conservative (nuclear family, kin-oriented, etc.). He says that simple ostracism or contempt would be sufficient to make these degenerates go "back in the closet". The physical removal part only comes when they start to act militant.

>>8534950
>I have read this quote
I meant I have read this book.

To expand on this, he says the fact that private property owners would have the right to admit or exclude whomever they wanted from their property, it would be certainly in their interests to not only get rid of people who are universally reviled by society (con men, beggars, homeless, rude people, the unpleasant, gypsies, etc.) but also of people who are in fact a tangible threat to the libertarian order.

>>8534724
triggered

We still have a few months, I hope he doesn't let us down.