[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 36 KB, 300x250, 300px-Rw_logo_text.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8079047 No.8079047[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

ITT: sources you can trust

>> No.8079051

>>8079047
reddit.com

>> No.8079065

>>8079047
>this triggers the Christfag
The only thing I've noticed Rational Wiki being terribly dumb about is nutrition.

>> No.8079070

infowars
metapedia

>> No.8079079

>>8079065
They push the antitheist angle too hard, even falling back on dubious sources. Also they are a bunch of obnoxious muh identity politics establishment liberals self-satisfied in their bland politics and cringe Jon Stewart snark.

>> No.8079088

>>8079079
Oh no, strongly held and solidly backed positions!

>> No.8079100

>>8079088
That they don't have.

>> No.8079104

tvtropes

>> No.8079109
File: 18 KB, 353x334, shrek fedora.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8079109

>>8079100
>God is real and I can prove it

>> No.8079111

>>8079109
You're a lousy troll.

>> No.8079113
File: 10 KB, 274x200, spurdo crusade.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8079113

>>8079111
>non-theists are just trolling and probably worship the devil

>> No.8079115

>>8079109
>>8079113
Actually they're insane SJW cultists

>> No.8079118

>>8079115
you are being baited comrade

>> No.8079119

The only reasonable answer is a respectable, peer-reviewed academic journal of X, where X is your domain of interest. If you can't read academic journals then you're destined to talk about theoretical things that you will never understand on the level of Youtube and 4chan with third-rate sources like that you mention.

Rational Wiki is something akin to LessWrong: a bunch of mouth-breathing, self-declared geniuses slash autists spreading and forcing their agenda onto others.

>> No.8079120

https://www.samharris.org/

>> No.8079121

>>8079047
Katehon.com
Press TV
David Icke.com

>> No.8079123

>>8079115
>they fell for progressive memes
>ergo the unrelated and not original to the site arguments against theism are invalid
top logic

>> No.8079125

>>8079118
I'm just saying that guy was taking the wrong angle, since I'm also an atheist.

>>8079123
That's not what I said, but I'm glad you agree with me.

>> No.8079134

Encyclopedia Dramatica

>> No.8079155

>>8079125
>I'm just saying that guy was taking the wrong angle, since I'm also an atheist.
Nice try, Father.

>> No.8079248

>>8079047
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
10/10

>> No.8079401

>RationalWiki
>not LessWrong

>> No.8079505

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/